BrighT STAR LIBRA: Leveraging Implementation Science for Blood Culture Reduction Approaches

NCT ID: NCT06187662

Last Updated: 2025-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare two strategies that target distinct determinants of blood culture overuse in an exploratory, hybrid, pilot trial in 8 PICUs. It aims to determine if there is any association between specific strategies used to reduce blood culture overuse on unit-wide blood culture rates, patient safety, and concurrently explore aspects of the implementation process (acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Blood cultures are an important test to diagnose bacterial bloodstream infections, but can be ordered reflexively, excessively, and lead to downstream negative patient consequences such as unnecessary antibiotic exposure. Work to date has demonstrated safe and effective reduction in blood culture rates in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) setting, but optimal strategies to reduce culture use are currently unknown.

The primary study team will initially work with all enrolled sites in an identical fashion, facilitating a core series of steps for implementing a quality improvement blood culture diagnostic stewardship program which is identical to the steps used in the parent study, called BrighT STAR (Testing STewardship to reduce Antibiotic use and Resistance). In addition, the primary study team will randomize sites into two arms, in which different strategies are introduced that each target distinct determinants of blood culture overuse. The primary study team will examine the impact on blood culture rates, as well as evaluate aspects of the implementation process, in all sites pre- vs-post intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Blood Culture Rates Antibiotic Stewardship Implementation Science

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Study sites will be randomized into two arms, in which different strategies are introduced that each target distinct determinants of blood culture overuse
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
The primary study team will know which arm the participating site PICUs will be in, but the local study team and care teams will be blinded.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Default Bias

This intervention consists of a checklist to guide blood culture decisions, that a clinician in a site randomized to Arm A will be asked to consult and complete prior to ordering or not ordering a blood culture; as the relevant clinical scenario occurs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Checklist

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This intervention consists of a checklist to guide blood culture decisions, that a clinician in a site randomized to Arm A will be asked to consult and complete prior to ordering or not ordering a blood culture; as the relevant clinical scenario occurs. Meaning, if a clinician in Arm A is faced with a scenario in which it is customary or usual care to consider a blood culture, the clinician will be asked to first review this checklist. The checklist is not a binding or absolute process - the clinician should use both the checklist and typical clinical judgment to decide if the blood culture test is needed or not. The checklist is based on prototypes used in the completed parent study, BrighT STAR and the earlier preliminary studies at Johns Hopkins.

Loss Aversion

This intervention consists of targeted messaging and education that the primary study team will create and ask the Arm B sites to deliver to the PICU clinicians, which focuses on the importance of diagnostic stewardship and the current evidence for the benefit/low risk nature of the stewardship program to date.

Sites in this arm will also receive a checklist to guide blood culture decisions, that clinicians at sites will be asked to consult and complete prior to ordering or not ordering a blood culture.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Checklist

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This intervention consists of a checklist to guide blood culture decisions, that a clinician in a site randomized to Arm A will be asked to consult and complete prior to ordering or not ordering a blood culture; as the relevant clinical scenario occurs. Meaning, if a clinician in Arm A is faced with a scenario in which it is customary or usual care to consider a blood culture, the clinician will be asked to first review this checklist. The checklist is not a binding or absolute process - the clinician should use both the checklist and typical clinical judgment to decide if the blood culture test is needed or not. The checklist is based on prototypes used in the completed parent study, BrighT STAR and the earlier preliminary studies at Johns Hopkins.

Targeted Messaging

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This intervention consists of targeted messaging and education that the primary study team will create and ask the Arm B sites to deliver to the PICU clinicians, which focuses on the importance of diagnostic stewardship and the current evidence for the benefit/low risk nature of the stewardship program to date.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Checklist

This intervention consists of a checklist to guide blood culture decisions, that a clinician in a site randomized to Arm A will be asked to consult and complete prior to ordering or not ordering a blood culture; as the relevant clinical scenario occurs. Meaning, if a clinician in Arm A is faced with a scenario in which it is customary or usual care to consider a blood culture, the clinician will be asked to first review this checklist. The checklist is not a binding or absolute process - the clinician should use both the checklist and typical clinical judgment to decide if the blood culture test is needed or not. The checklist is based on prototypes used in the completed parent study, BrighT STAR and the earlier preliminary studies at Johns Hopkins.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Targeted Messaging

This intervention consists of targeted messaging and education that the primary study team will create and ask the Arm B sites to deliver to the PICU clinicians, which focuses on the importance of diagnostic stewardship and the current evidence for the benefit/low risk nature of the stewardship program to date.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males or females over 18 years old
* PICU clinicians with direct patient care roles

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-English speaking
* PICU clinicians who report to the investigator
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Charlotte Woods-Hill, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Mission Bay

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Nemours / AI DuPont Hospital for Children

Wilmington, Delaware, United States

Site Status

Riley Hospital for Children

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Norton Children's Hospital

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Kravis Children's Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Children's Hospital of Wisconsin

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5K23HL151381-03

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

23-021013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

STaph Aureus Resistance-Treat Early and Repeat (STAR-TER)
NCT03489629 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2