The Effect of Sedoanalgesia and General Anaesthesia on Early Neurological Recovery in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy
NCT ID: NCT06183567
Last Updated: 2025-11-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
62 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-11-30
2026-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EVALUATION OF POSTOPERATIVE NEUROCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
NCT06685770
The Effects of General Versus Spinal Anesthesia on Postoperative Myocardial Injury
NCT06343259
Effect of Sedatives on Perioperative Electroencephalogram in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia
NCT04248075
The Effect of Two Different Modes of Anaesthesia Mainantance on Postoperative Delirium
NCT06597812
Adverse Events in Acute Limb Ischemic Patient Undergoing Revascularization
NCT05362266
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is controversy as to whether general anesthesia (GA) or sedoanalgesia (SA) should be used during EMT for acute ischemic stroke. There are not enough randomized trials addressing this question. Benefits of GA include airway preservation, pain control and potentially improved radiographic imaging and patient immobility for intervention. Conversely, GA is time-consuming and possibly associated with longer time for groin puncture and revascularization. In addition, hypotension may occur during GA, which carries a greater risk of ischemic damage. Advantages of SA may include shorter time to revascularization, fewer hemodynamic problems and the possibility of better neurological assessment during the procedure. The main arguments against SA are that patient movement can lead to procedural complications, higher radiation dose, the need for more contrast media and lack of airway control. Simonsen et al. compared general anesthesia and conscious sedation in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular treatment (GOLIATH) and showed that the choice of different anesthesia method can affect infarct area growth, clinical outcomes, and important physiological and anesthetic parameters.
Again, in the SIESTA (Sedation vs Intubation for Endovascular Stroke Treatment) study comparing sedation and intubation in endovascular stroke treatment, no significant difference was shown between both groups when early neurological recovery was compared (24th hour NIHSS). In this study, no superiority of conscious sedation over general anesthesia was demonstrated.
In the ESCAPE and SWIFT study, general anesthesia and conscious sedation were compared and conscious sedation was associated with better outcome than general anesthesia.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sedoanalgesia (SA) group
The aim was to achieve a moderate level of sedoanalgesia (previously called conscious sedation) that would reduce agitation, anxiety and mobility but allow communication with the patient. Sedation was maintained at a level where cardiovascular function was preserved and no intervention was required to protect the airway in spontaneous breathing. Fentanyl iv 25-50 µg bolus was administered to each patient undergoing sedoanalgesia. For maintenance of sedoanalgesia, propofol iv infusion was started at doses of 1-2 mg kg-1 hour. It was titrated according to BIS level. In case of patient noncompliance, propofol iv 0.5 mg kg-1 was intervened.
Sedoanalgesia
In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy, the procedure was performed under sedoanalgesia. The procedure was continued with mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and BIS monitoring.
general anesthesia
In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy, the procedure was performed under general anesthesia. The procedure was continued with mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and BIS monitoring.
General anesthesia (GA) group
Anesthesia induction was performed with lidocaine iv 0.5 mg kg-1, propofol iv 1-2 mg kg-1, fentanyl iv 25-50 µg. After providing adequate ventilation with a mask, rocuronium iv 0.45-0.6 mg kg-1 is administered and endotracheal intubation is performed. After intubation is confirmed with end-tidal CO2 monitoring, tidal volume is set to 6-8 ml kg-1 and respiratory frequency to 12/min in CMV mode. In order to maintain cerebral perfusion, PaCO2: 35-40 mmHg is aimed to be maintained. Sevoflurane MAC 0.8 and remifentanil infusion 0.03 µg kg-1 min iv were used for maintenance of anesthesia. At the end of the procedure, sugammadex iv 2mg kg-1 was administered for extubation.
Sedoanalgesia
In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy, the procedure was performed under sedoanalgesia. The procedure was continued with mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and BIS monitoring.
general anesthesia
In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy, the procedure was performed under general anesthesia. The procedure was continued with mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and BIS monitoring.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sedoanalgesia
In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy, the procedure was performed under sedoanalgesia. The procedure was continued with mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and BIS monitoring.
general anesthesia
In Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy, the procedure was performed under general anesthesia. The procedure was continued with mean arterial pressure, heart rate, pulse oximetry and BIS monitoring.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ASA 1-4
3. Body mass index below 30 kg m-2
4. NIHSS score ≥ 10
5. Presence of isolated/combined occlusion at any level of the anterior circulation internal carotid or middle cerebral artery
Exclusion Criteria
* EF less than 40
* Presence of intracranial hemorrhage
* Previous known history of severe neurological disease
* Presence of bleeding diathesis
* Pre-procedure GCS ≤ 8 and intubated patients
* Failure to clearly show the site of vascular occlusion on diagnostic imaging results
* Clinical or imaging evidence of vascular occlusion that is not internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery
* Absence of gag reflex, loss of airway protective reflex, inadequate saliva swallowing
* History of lung infection, advanced COPD or respiratory failure
* Known history of aspiration due to vomiting,
* Known history of difficult airway
* In the presence of known intolerance or allergy to certain drugs for sedation, analgesia or both
* Previously known carotid artery stenosis
* Pregnant patients
* Patients without consent
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Umraniye Education and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zeliha Alicikus
Head of Anesthesiology and Reanimation department,Assoc Prof
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Umraniye Education and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Umraniye, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UERH-AR-ZT-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.