Incidence of Postoperative Delirium in Cancer Patients After Laparoscopic Surgery in Trendelenburg Position
NCT ID: NCT03572517
Last Updated: 2019-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
65 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-01
2018-09-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to optimize the anesthetic procedure, anesthetic blocks have been increasingly used, especially the spinal. The association of general anesthesia with spinal anesthesia, followed by its contraindications is advantageous, because lower doses of anesthetic agents are necessary for the maintenance of general anesthesia. This association results in an earlier awakening, a reduction of nausea / vomiting, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, cost effectiveness and greater patient satisfaction. As a disadvantage, by associating general anesthesia with spinal anesthesia, patients become susceptible to the adverse events of spinal anesthesia. Among these, the most common are headache, hypotension, nausea and vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention and tremor. Performing spinal anesthesia with opioids alone, without the use of local anesthetic is also possible, with morphine being the most used. The benefit of this variation of technique is analgesia for a period of 12 to 24 hours, without the cardiovascular consequences resulting from the action of the local anesthetic.
JUSTIFICATION: There are no studies in the literature evaluating The objective of this study is to analyze if the anesthetic techniques employed, general anesthesia or general anesthesia associated with subarachnoid block, for videolaparoscopic oncologic surgeries, in Trendelenburg position, differ in relation to the incidence of delirium in the postoperative period.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predictive Factors and Complications of Delirium
NCT03246165
Cerebral Blood Supply During Cardiopulmonary Bypass
NCT03117712
Rate of Postoperative Delirium and Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction After Spinal Anesthesia
NCT03715244
An MRI Study of Post-operative Delirium in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery
NCT02126215
Intraoperative Sedatives and Postoperative Deilirium
NCT03251651
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
These patients will be monitored intraoperatively with electrocardiogram (ECG), noninvasive pressure, pulse oximetry, capnography, BIS, monitor of neuromuscular blocker (TOF), esophageal temperature and Trendelenburg angle.
The measured moments will be patient entry in the operating room, after pre-anesthetic medication, anesthetic pre-induction, after anesthetic induction, after surgical incision, after pneumoperitoneum infusion, after Trendelenburg position, every 15 minutes until the end of the procedure and after extubation.
All patients will receive morphine 50 mcg via the spinal route. All patients will receive intravenous pre-anesthetic medication midazolam 0.03 mg / kg for comfort during spinal anesthesia and 500 ml of crystalloid solution prior to blockade associated with 4 ml / kg / hour of crystalloid solution plus volume to be depended of clinical parameters.
Subarachnoid block will be performed in the seated position, antisepsis / asepsis with alcoholic chlorhexidine, location of the L3 / L4 space, needle puncture with whitacre 27 G, barbotation of 0.5 ml and injection lasting 5 to 7 seconds.
Spinal morphine will be performed with the same anesthetic technique described in the subarachnoid block.
A general anesthetic with pre-oxygenation 8 liters / minute for 5 minutes + fentanyl 3 mcg / kg + propofol 2 mg / kg + rocuronium 0.6 mg / kg will be performed. Patients will be ventilated with a mixture of oxygen and air through an inspired fraction of 40% oxygen and maintaining an expired concentration of carbon dioxide between 35 and 45 mmHg. Anesthesia will be maintained with remifentanil (ng / ml) through Minto's pharmacokinetic model (BBraun infusion syringe - Perfusor® Space model) and desflurane (Fe%).
Hypnosis will be guided by maintaining BIS between 40 and 60 and the dose of remifentanil will be adjusted by vital signs.
Patients with medium arterial pressure with values lower than 60 mmHg will be medicated with vasopressors depending on heart rate. If heart rate is greater than 60 beats per minute (bpm) metaraminol 0.5 mg will be used and 5 mg ephedrine will be used if heart rate less than 60 bpm.
In both groups, the patients will be kept warm with a thermal blanket and will have their esophageal temperature measured (40 cm from the incisor teeth).
After the surgical procedure, neuromuscular blockade will be antagonized with suggamadex, according to the monitoring of neuromuscular blockade through TOF.
* Deep block (at least 1 to 2 responses in PTC, but prior to the appearance of T2, ie the second response to TOF): 4 mg / kg.
* Moderate block (after onset of T2): 2mg / kg.
* 16 mg / kg is recommended if there is a clinical condition requiring rapid reversal (approximately 3 minutes) following the single dose of rocuronium at 1.2 mg / kg.
After 5 minutes of extubation, vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, saturation) will be collected and the patient will be evaluated for the presence of delirium. Dipyrone 2 grams and parecoxib 40 mg will be performed without contraindication for postoperative analgesia.
Patients will then be referred to the anesthetic recovery room, where they will continue to be monitored with ECG, noninvasive pressure and pulse oximeters. They will also be evaluated for pain in the numerical estimate scale (NRS) (0 = no pain, up to 10 = maximum pain), on arrival and every 30 minutes until the time of discharge into the room. Those who present pain with NRS greater than 4 in PACU will be treated with morphine 1 mg every 10 minutes. Those with nausea / vomiting will be given alizapride 50 mg.
Patients will be assessed with regard to the appearance of delirium by means of CAM (Confusion Assemption Method) in association with the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scale.
CAM is a simple screening method based on the following four questions, with Criteria 1 and 2 plus 3 or 4 being present:
1. Acute onset: Is there evidence of acute change in the patient's underlying mental state?
2. Attention Disorder: Has the patient had difficulty focusing on his or her attention, for example, was easily distracted or had difficulty following what was being said?
3. Disorganized thinking: Was the patient's thinking disorganized or incoherent, with dispersive or irrelevant conversion, unclear or illogical flow of ideas, or unpredictable change of subject?
4. Changes in level of consciousness: Does the patient present altered level of consciousness such as lethargy, torporous, comatose? The RASS, was developed with the purpose of characterizing the level of consciousness and agitation. Signs of hyperactive delirium are defined as scores ranging from +1 (anxious patient), +2 (frequent uncoordinated unintentional movements, fight against ventilation), +3 (aggressive) to +4 (very aggressive). Signs of hypoactive delirium are defined as RASS ranging from - 5 (patient does not respond), - 4 (no response to voice sound), -3 (movements or ocular opening to voice sound), -2 (awakens briefly), - 1 (not completely alert) to 0 (patient calm or sleepy).
This evaluation will be performed by nurses, previously trained, on arrival at PACU every 30 minutes until discharge from the post-anesthetic recovery room and 24 hours after the patient's discharge from the hospital. In cases where the patient has an episode of persistent delirium for more than 1 hour, the evaluation of a psychiatrist will be requested for follow-up and treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
1. Balanced general anesthesia.
2. Balanced general anesthesia associated with subarachnoid block with 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (3ml).
All patients will receive morphine 50 mcg via the spinal route.
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subarachnoid block
Subarachnoid block with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0,5% 3ml associate with morphine 50 mcg.
A general anesthetic with fentanyl 3 mcg / kg + propofol 2 mg / kg + rocuronium 0.6 mg / kg will be performed.
Anesthesia will be maintained with remifentanil (ng / ml) through Minto's pharmacokinetic model (BBraun infusion syringe - Perfusor® Space model) and desflurane (Fe%).
Subarachnoid block
Balanced general anesthesia (Induction of anesthesia: Propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium. Maintenance: Desflurane /remifentanil) associated with subarachnoid block (bupivacaine and morphine)
Spinal morphine
Spinal morphine with morphine 50 mcg. A general anesthetic with fentanyl 3 mcg / kg + propofol 2 mg / kg + rocuronium 0.6 mg / kg will be performed.
Anesthesia will be maintained with remifentanil (ng / ml) through Minto's pharmacokinetic model (BBraun infusion syringe - Perfusor® Space model) and desflurane (Fe%).
Spinal morphine
Balanced general anesthesia (Induction of anesthesia: Propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium. Maintenance: Desflurane /remifentanil) and spinal analgesia with morphine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subarachnoid block
Balanced general anesthesia (Induction of anesthesia: Propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium. Maintenance: Desflurane /remifentanil) associated with subarachnoid block (bupivacaine and morphine)
Spinal morphine
Balanced general anesthesia (Induction of anesthesia: Propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium. Maintenance: Desflurane /remifentanil) and spinal analgesia with morphine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 18 years or older
* ASA lesser than 3
* period of at least 2 hours in Trendelenburg position
Exclusion Criteria
* With difficult airway prediction with possibility of awake intubation.
* With previous diagnosis of: cognitive disorder and / or depression.
* Chronic use of benzodiazepines (use during the last 12 weeks).
* Referred to perform the postoperative ICU.
* With diagnosis of anemia (Hemoglobin \<10).
* With diagnosis of current infection.
* With renal disease with stage\> G3a (glomerular filtration rate \<45 ml / min / 1.73 m2.
* With body mass index (BMI) characterized by obesity (BMI\> 30 kg / m2).
* With history of nausea / vomiting in previous anesthetic procedures.
* With diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
AC Camargo Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giane Nakamura
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
A.C. Camargo Cancer Center
São Paulo, , Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Absalom AR, Glen JI, Zwart GJ, Schnider TW, Struys MM. Target-Controlled Infusion: A Mature Technology. Anesth Analg. 2016 Jan;122(1):70-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001009.
Aldecoa C, Bettelli G, Bilotta F, Sanders RD, Audisio R, Borozdina A, Cherubini A, Jones C, Kehlet H, MacLullich A, Radtke F, Riese F, Slooter AJ, Veyckemans F, Kramer S, Neuner B, Weiss B, Spies CD. European Society of Anaesthesiology evidence-based and consensus-based guideline on postoperative delirium. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Apr;34(4):192-214. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000594.
Ali HH, Utting JE, Gray C. Stimulus frequency in the detection of neuromuscular block in humans. Br J Anaesth. 1970 Nov;42(11):967-78. doi: 10.1093/bja/42.11.967. No abstract available.
Ali S, Patel M, Jabeen S, Bailey RK, Patel T, Shahid M, Riley WJ, Arain A. Insight into delirium. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2011 Oct;8(10):25-34.
American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults. Postoperative delirium in older adults: best practice statement from the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Feb;220(2):136-48.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Nov 14. No abstract available.
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):248-73. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823c1030. No abstract available.
Apfel CC, Kranke P, Katz MH, Goepfert C, Papenfuss T, Rauch S, Heineck R, Greim CA, Roewer N. Volatile anaesthetics may be the main cause of early but not delayed postoperative vomiting: a randomized controlled trial of factorial design. Br J Anaesth. 2002 May;88(5):659-68. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.5.659.
Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, Ovassapian A; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2. No abstract available.
Araimo Morselli FSM, Zuccarini F, Caporlingua F, Scarpa I, Imperiale C, Caporlingua A, De Biase L, Tordiglione P. Intrathecal Versus Intravenous Morphine in Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Blinded Randomized Comparative Prospective Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Mar;42(5):281-284. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001733.
Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, Grelon F, Megarbane B, Anguel N, Mira JP, Dequin PF, Gergaud S, Weiss N, Legay F, Le Tulzo Y, Conrad M, Robert R, Gonzalez F, Guitton C, Tamion F, Tonnelier JM, Guezennec P, Van Der Linden T, Vieillard-Baron A, Mariotte E, Pradel G, Lesieur O, Ricard JD, Herve F, du Cheyron D, Guerin C, Mercat A, Teboul JL, Radermacher P; SEPSISPAM Investigators. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 24;370(17):1583-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312173. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
Barrio J, Errando CL, San Miguel G, Salas BI, Raga J, Carrion JL, Garcia-Ramon J, Gallego J. Effect of depth of neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal space during pneumoperitoneum establishment in laparoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 May 11.
Bartels K, Esper SA, Thiele RH. Blood Pressure Monitoring for the Anesthesiologist: A Practical Review. Anesth Analg. 2016 Jun;122(6):1866-79. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001340.
Bessa SS, Katri KM, Abdel-Salam WN, El-Kayal el-SA, Tawfik TA. Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Jul-Aug;22(6):550-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0110. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
Birch DW, Dang JT, Switzer NJ, Manouchehri N, Shi X, Hadi G, Karmali S. Heated insufflation with or without humidification for laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 19;10(10):CD007821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007821.pub3.
Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Schenker CA. Postoperative nausea and vomiting in regional anesthesia: a review. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):530-47. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00036. No abstract available.
Brull SJ, Murphy GS. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part II: methods to reduce the risk of residual weakness. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):129-40. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da8312. Epub 2010 May 4.
Bryson GL. [Methods and madness: agitation, delirium, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction]. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;57(9):799-803. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9339-8. No abstract available. French.
Campbell N, Boustani M, Limbil T, Ott C, Fox C, Maidment I, Schubert CC, Munger S, Fick D, Miller D, Gulati R. The cognitive impact of anticholinergics: a clinical review. Clin Interv Aging. 2009;4:225-33. doi: 10.2147/cia.s5358. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
Card E, Pandharipande P, Tomes C, Lee C, Wood J, Nelson D, Graves A, Shintani A, Ely EW, Hughes C. Emergence from general anaesthesia and evolution of delirium signs in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;115(3):411-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu442. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
Carmichael DE. Laparoscopy-cardiac considerations. Fertil Steril. 1971 Jan;22(1):69-70. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)37990-0. No abstract available.
Carpenter RL, Caplan RA, Brown DL, Stephenson C, Wu R. Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1992 Jun;76(6):906-16. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199206000-00006.
Closhen D, Treiber AH, Berres M, Sebastiani A, Werner C, Engelhard K, Schramm P. Robotic assisted prostatic surgery in the Trendelenburg position does not impair cerebral oxygenation measured using two different monitors: A clinical observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Feb;31(2):104-9. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000000.
Cestari A, Buffi NM, Scapaticci E, Lughezzani G, Salonia A, Briganti A, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Guazzoni G. Simplifying patient positioning and port placement during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):530-3. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.028. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
de Boer HD, Driessen JJ, Marcus MA, Kerkkamp H, Heeringa M, Klimek M. Reversal of rocuronium-induced (1.2 mg/kg) profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex: a multicenter, dose-finding and safety study. Anesthesiology. 2007 Aug;107(2):239-44. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000270722.95764.37.
Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Hart RP, Dittus R. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA. 2001 Dec 5;286(21):2703-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.21.2703.
Fabbri RM, Moreira MA, Garrido R, Almeida OP. Validity and reliability of the Portuguese version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for the detection of delirium in the elderly. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2001 Jun;59(2-A):175-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2001000200004.
Farag E, Chelune GJ, Schubert A, Mascha EJ. Is depth of anesthesia, as assessed by the Bispectral Index, related to postoperative cognitive dysfunction and recovery? Anesth Analg. 2006 Sep;103(3):633-40. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000228870.48028.b5.
Gerges FJ, Kanazi GE, Jabbour-Khoury SI. Anesthesia for laparoscopy: a review. J Clin Anesth. 2006 Feb;18(1):67-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.01.013.
Golinger RC, Peet T, Tune LE. Association of elevated plasma anticholinergic activity with delirium in surgical patients. Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Sep;144(9):1218-20. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.9.1218.
Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Kashfi A, Kraus T, Buchler MW. Circulatory and respiratory complications of carbon dioxide insufflation. Dig Surg. 2004;21(2):95-105. doi: 10.1159/000077038. Epub 2004 Feb 27.
Henny CP, Hofland J. Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc. 2005 Sep;19(9):1163-71. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-2250-z. Epub 2005 Jul 28.
Hirsch J, DePalma G, Tsai TT, Sands LP, Leung JM. Impact of intraoperative hypotension and blood pressure fluctuations on early postoperative delirium after non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Sep;115(3):418-26. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu458. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
Inouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):911-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):941-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941.
Kalmar AF, Foubert L, Hendrickx JF, Mottrie A, Absalom A, Mortier EP, Struys MM. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position and CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory homeostasis during robotic prostatectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):433-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq018. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
Kopman AF, Naguib M. Laparoscopic surgery and muscle relaxants: is deep block helpful? Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):51-58. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000471.
Lepouse C, Lautner CA, Liu L, Gomis P, Leon A. Emergence delirium in adults in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;96(6):747-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael094. Epub 2006 May 2.
Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, Wiklund P, Odeberg-Wernerman S. Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45 degrees Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1069-75. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182075d1f. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
McDaniel M, Brudney C. Postoperative delirium: etiology and management. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012 Aug;18(4):372-6. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283557211.
Messina AG, Wang M, Ward MJ, Wilker CC, Smith BB, Vezina DP, Pace NL. Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 18;10(10):CD007272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007272.pub2.
O'Malley C, Cunningham AJ. Physiologic changes during laparoscopy. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2001 Mar;19(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(05)70208-x.
Rex C, Bergner UA, Puhringer FK. Sugammadex: a selective relaxant-binding agent providing rapid reversal. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2010 Aug;23(4):461-5. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833a5413.
Rosendal C, Markin S, Hien MD, Motsch J, Roggenbach J. Cardiac and hemodynamic consequences during capnoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning: lessons learned from robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Aug;26(5):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
Salluh JI, Wang H, Schneider EB, Nagaraja N, Yenokyan G, Damluji A, Serafim RB, Stevens RD. Outcome of delirium in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2015 Jun 3;350:h2538. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h2538.
Sanders RD, Pandharipande PP, Davidson AJ, Ma D, Maze M. Anticipating and managing postoperative delirium and cognitive decline in adults. BMJ. 2011 Jul 20;343:d4331. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4331. No abstract available.
Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.
Steiner LA. Postoperative delirium. Part 1: pathophysiology and risk factors. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Sep;28(9):628-36. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328349b7f5.
Steiner LA. Postoperative delirium. part 2: detection, prevention and treatment. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;28(10):723-32. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328349b7db.
Wang M, Singh A, Qureshi H, Leone A, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI. Optimal Depth for Nasopharyngeal Temperature Probe Positioning. Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1434-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001213.
Witlox J, Eurelings LS, de Jonghe JF, Kalisvaart KJ, Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA. Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2010 Jul 28;304(4):443-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1013.
Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Stein B, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Carli F. Spinal analgesia for laparoscopic colonic resection using an enhanced recovery after surgery programme: better analgesia, but no benefits on postoperative recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2012 May;108(5):850-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes028. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
Yu D, Chai W, Sun X, Yao L. Emergence agitation in adults: risk factors in 2,000 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2010 Sep;57(9):843-8. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9338-9. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2205/16
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.