Pilot Study on HA380 Column Use in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Support.
NCT ID: NCT06179771
Last Updated: 2025-03-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-12
2027-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ECMO for COVID-19 vs Influenza A H1N1 Associated ARDS
NCT05080933
Physiological Study of Prone Position in Acute Respiratory Failure Syndrome
NCT06061796
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Fluid Responsiveness in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA ECMO) - "HemodynamECMOnitoring-VA Study"
NCT06593756
Validation of a Semi-automatized Method to Detect Cyclic Hyperinflation on CT-scan in ARDS
NCT03870009
Functional Respiratory Imaging of Airways in ARDS
NCT03309085
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The concept of attenuating severe hyperinflammatory response is sometimes used in certain disease states using agents such as intravenous corticosteroids, plasma exchange and more recently, anti-cytokine monoclonal antibodies. However, these strategies are associated with side effects (e.g. Bleeding and increased risk of infection), and are not necessarily appropriate in all critically ill patients with severe inflammation. Studies investigating the efficacy of these strategies have failed to show any clinical benefit except in the setting of COVID 19 infection.1-4 Early use of cytokine adsorption devices may provide an alternative non- pharmacological pathway with fewer side effects which can be deployed early.
The most studied cytokine adsorption device is the CytoSorb column which consists of biocompatible polymer sorbent beads. Several studies have demonstrated a reduction in vasopressor requirements, IL-6 levels, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores.5,6 However, this observation did not translate into outcome benefit. There is considerable heterogeneity in how the cytokine adsorption is delivered in these studies and the study designs. An international registry analysis did not demonstrate a mortality benefit with CytoSorb either.7
The HA380 column consists of styrene divinylbenzene copolymers. In a recent study consisting of patients undergoing cardio-pulmonary bypass, patients who received the HA 380 column required lower vasopressor doses, shorter duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and had a shorter ICU length of stay.8 A direct in- vitro comparison of the CytoSorb device and the HA 380 device shows that the latter is less efficient at removing cytokines compared to the CytoSorb device but both devices were efficient at removing pro-inflammatory cytokines.9 The role of cytokines in critical illness is a double-edged sword10, and this may well be where CytoSorb may have a disadvantage - providing higher cytokine clearance for a longer period.
We hypothesise that the HA380 column use in critically ill patients with inflammation receiving renal replacement therapy or ECMO is associated with an improvement in mortality. It is recommended to be used early (within 72 hours of commencement of extracorporeal support). HA380 hemoperfusion cartridge, mainly adsorbs molecules from 10 to 60 kDa. Because of the accurate 3D macroporous structure and over 54000 m2 adsorption surface area of the resin.HA380 haemoperfusion therapy can provide a new regimen in controlling inflammatory cytokines storm. Studies have demonstrated the ability of the HA380 column to reduce the concentration of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, TNF-alpha. 11,12
The aim of this feasibility pilot is to assess the feasibility of the early use of the HA380 cytokine adsorption column in a study and its effect on the time-to-liberation from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, vasoactive drug requirement and duration of vasoactive therapy, and mortality (or clinical surrogates for all-cause mortality).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Interventional
Patients assigned to interventional arm will receive treatment with a cytokine adsorption device (HA 380) within 72 hours of being admitted to ICU. This is in addition to standard evidence based ICU care. Each patient will receive 2 treatments each lasting a maximum of 6 hours in a 24 hour period.
HA 380
HA380 hemoperfusion cartridge is filled with neutral macroporous resin, mainly adsorbing molecules from 10 to 60 kDa. Because of the accurate 3D macroporous structure and over 54000 m2 adsorption surface area of the resin. The cartridge is attached to the extracorporeal circuit in series with the oxygenator/ filter of the extracorporeal circuit.
Standard care
Patients assigned to the standard care arm would receive evidence based standard ICU care.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HA 380
HA380 hemoperfusion cartridge is filled with neutral macroporous resin, mainly adsorbing molecules from 10 to 60 kDa. Because of the accurate 3D macroporous structure and over 54000 m2 adsorption surface area of the resin. The cartridge is attached to the extracorporeal circuit in series with the oxygenator/ filter of the extracorporeal circuit.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or Female, aged 18 years - 65 years.
* Admitted with a diagnosis of sepsis (according to sepsis-3 definition), trauma, ARDS of infectious or non-infectious aetiology, trauma or after major surgery
* Need for extracorporeal support and specifically renal replacement therapy (RRT) and/or ECMO.
* Vasopressor or inotropic therapy requirement at the time of RRT or ECMO support
* Within 72 hours of requiring extracorporeal support
* At least one of:
* CRP \> 100 mg/L (in the absence of immunosuppressive therapy/immunomodulation)
* Lactate \>2 mmol/L
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable to obtain consent.
* Expected to die in the next 24 hours.
* Pre-existing chronic kidney disease - requiring dialysis /eGFR \< 30ml/min/1.73m2
* Pre-existing severe respiratory failure - e.g., requiring home oxygen/ home nebulisers/ poor exercise tolerance
* Chronic heart failure - NYHA class III and above
* Pregnancy
* Requirement for immediate immune modulation e.g., plasma exchange, high dose steroids , IV immunoglobulins (does not include vasoplegic dose of steroids or immune modulation for COVID 19)
* Participants who have participated in another research trial involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jafron Biomedical Company Limited
UNKNOWN
University Hospitals, Leicester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Granowitz EV, Clark BD, Mancilla J, Dinarello CA. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist competitively inhibits the binding of interleukin-1 to the type II interleukin-1 receptor. J Biol Chem. 1991 Aug 5;266(22):14147-50.
Fisher CJ Jr, Dhainaut JF, Opal SM, Pribble JP, Balk RA, Slotman GJ, Iberti TJ, Rackow EC, Shapiro MJ, Greenman RL, et al. Recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phase III rhIL-1ra Sepsis Syndrome Study Group. JAMA. 1994 Jun 15;271(23):1836-43.
Opal SM, Fisher CJ Jr, Dhainaut JF, Vincent JL, Brase R, Lowry SF, Sadoff JC, Slotman GJ, Levy H, Balk RA, Shelly MP, Pribble JP, LaBrecque JF, Lookabaugh J, Donovan H, Dubin H, Baughman R, Norman J, DeMaria E, Matzel K, Abraham E, Seneff M. Confirmatory interleukin-1 receptor antagonist trial in severe sepsis: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. The Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Sepsis Investigator Group. Crit Care Med. 1997 Jul;25(7):1115-24. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199707000-00010.
REMAP-CAP Investigators; Gordon AC, Mouncey PR, Al-Beidh F, Rowan KM, Nichol AD, Arabi YM, Annane D, Beane A, van Bentum-Puijk W, Berry LR, Bhimani Z, Bonten MJM, Bradbury CA, Brunkhorst FM, Buzgau A, Cheng AC, Detry MA, Duffy EJ, Estcourt LJ, Fitzgerald M, Goossens H, Haniffa R, Higgins AM, Hills TE, Horvat CM, Lamontagne F, Lawler PR, Leavis HL, Linstrum KM, Litton E, Lorenzi E, Marshall JC, Mayr FB, McAuley DF, McGlothlin A, McGuinness SP, McVerry BJ, Montgomery SK, Morpeth SC, Murthy S, Orr K, Parke RL, Parker JC, Patanwala AE, Pettila V, Rademaker E, Santos MS, Saunders CT, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Sligl WI, Turgeon AF, Turner AM, van de Veerdonk FL, Zarychanski R, Green C, Lewis RJ, Angus DC, McArthur CJ, Berry S, Webb SA, Derde LPG. Interleukin-6 Receptor Antagonists in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1491-1502. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100433. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Huang Z, Wang SR, Su W, Liu JY. Removal of humoral mediators and the effect on the survival of septic patients by hemoperfusion with neutral microporous resin column. Ther Apher Dial. 2010 Dec;14(6):596-602. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2010.00825.x.
Huang Z, Wang SR, Yang ZL, Liu JY. Effect on extrapulmonary sepsis-induced acute lung injury by hemoperfusion with neutral microporous resin column. Ther Apher Dial. 2013 Aug;17(4):454-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2012.01083.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
340810
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
160716
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.