ALI/ARDS Clinical Sub-phenotyping Study

NCT ID: NCT06123962

Last Updated: 2025-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-14

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Construct a structured clinical data and biosample information platform for Chinese patients with acute lung injury/ acute respiratory distress syndrome.
2. By deciphering the heterogeneity of patients with acute lung injury/ acute respiratory distress syndrome, achieve clinical, longitudinal physiological, and biological sub-phenotyping to guide individualized precision treatment and improve prognosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute lung injury/ acute respiratory distress syndrome is one of the most common and complex critical illnesses in clinical practice, with a high mortality rate of 45% to 50%. Currently, effective therapeutic strategies for this condition are still lacking. Increasing evidence suggests that the significant heterogeneity of this disease plays a crucial role in the poor treatment outcomes and high mortality rates observed in patients. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the heterogeneity of acute lung injury/ acute respiratory distress syndrome patients and establish a clinical classification system for acute lung and extrapulmonary organ injuries.

The objectives of this study include establishing a nationwide clinical database and biobank for acute lung injury / acute respiratory distress syndrome by collecting clinical data and biological samples from various provinces. By overcoming the barriers posed by diverse and heterogeneous data sources, mathematical and machine learning models will be utilized to construct clinical, physiological, and biological classification systems for acute lung and extrapulmonary organ injuries. The proposed classification model will be validated multiple times using international public databases and prospective acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome cohorts to ensure its stability and generalizability. The mapping relationship between different classifications and patient prognosis as well as treatment responsiveness will be explored.

Moreover, a machine learning-based supervised technique will be applied to develop a bedside simplified model (Point-of-Care model) and establish a bedside clinical classification decision system. Ultimately, this research aims to provide a foundation for standardized and precision-guided clinical diagnostic and therapeutic pathways, promoting improved treatment outcomes and overall prognosis in acute lung injury/ acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Collect peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

Peripheral venous blood will be collected and stored from the study participants at a total of five time points: Day 0, Day 1, Day 2, Day 3 after admission to the ICU, and the day of ICU discharge/death. The collection will be conducted after assessing the patients' eligibility for ARDS diagnosis. Each time point will involve the collection of one tube of peripheral venous blood, totaling 5 mL per sample.

Within 24 hours after patients' admission to the ICU and meeting the assessment criteria for ARDS diagnosis, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) will be collected and retained, totaling 10 mL.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Meet the diagnostic criteria for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) according to the updated global definition in 2023.
* The patient or their legal representative signs an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Individuals aged less than 18 years old.
* Those who refuse to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

China-Japan Friendship Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jingen Xia

Clinical Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jingen Xia

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jingen Xia

Beijing, , China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jingen Xia, M.D

Role: CONTACT

+8613466396561

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jingen Xia, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thompson BT, Chambers RC, Liu KD. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 10;377(6):562-572. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1608077. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28792873 (View on PubMed)

Huang X, Zhang R, Fan G, Wu D, Lu H, Wang D, Deng W, Sun T, Xing L, Liu S, Wang S, Cai Y, Tian Y, Zhang Y, Xia J, Zhan Q; CHARDSnet group. Incidence and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units of mainland China: a multicentre prospective longitudinal study. Crit Care. 2020 Aug 20;24(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03112-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32819400 (View on PubMed)

Reilly JP, Calfee CS, Christie JD. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phenotypes. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Feb;40(1):19-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1684049. Epub 2019 May 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31060085 (View on PubMed)

Shah FA, Meyer NJ, Angus DC, Awdish R, Azoulay E, Calfee CS, Clermont G, Gordon AC, Kwizera A, Leligdowicz A, Marshall JC, Mikacenic C, Sinha P, Venkatesh B, Wong HR, Zampieri FG, Yende S. A Research Agenda for Precision Medicine in Sepsis and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 15;204(8):891-901. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202108-1908ST.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34652268 (View on PubMed)

Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA; NHLBI ARDS Network. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Aug;2(8):611-20. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70097-9. Epub 2014 May 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24853585 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022YFC2504401

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.