Interobserver Variation in Applying a Radiographic Definition for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
NCT ID: NCT01704066
Last Updated: 2012-12-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
286 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-10-31
2012-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
As a result, the newly published Berlin definition of ARDS specified that the CXR criterion should include bilateral opacities consistent with pulmonary edema not fully explained by effusions, lobar/lung collapse, or nodules/masses on CXR.
In order to improve inter-observer agreement, the panel have also developed a set of CXRs judged as consistent, inconsistent, or equivocal for the diagnosis of ARDS.
The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of this training set on inter-observer reliability in applying the radiographic definition for ARDS.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phase 1: All participants will be required to independently interpret a set of 12 CXRs, as provided by the consensus panel. The possible radiographic interpretations include consistent, inconsistent, or equivocal for the diagnosis of ARDS.
Phase 2: Training materials adapted according to the recently published Berlin definition of ARDS, with its expanded rationale and interpretation of all 12 CXRs, will be sent to all participants.
Phase 3: The same set of 12 CXRs, in different order, will be sent to all participants for interpretation for the second time.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Training and education
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* those who have read the reference with the training set of CXRs before the study
* those who have already known the objective of the study
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Society of Critical Care Medicine, China
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bin Du
Professor and Director, Medical ICU
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Bin Du, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Peng JM, Qian CY, Yu XY, Zhao MY, Li SS, Ma XC, Kang Y, Zhou FC, He ZY, Qin TH, Yin YJ, Jiang L, Hu ZJ, Sun RH, Lin JD, Li T, Wu DW, An YZ, Ai YH, Zhou LH, Cao XY, Zhang XJ, Sun RQ, Chen EZ, Du B; China Critical Care Clinical Trial Group (CCCCTG). Does training improve diagnostic accuracy and inter-rater agreement in applying the Berlin radiographic definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome? A multicenter prospective study. Crit Care. 2017 Jan 20;21(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1606-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012BAI11B05
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CCCCTG-2012-ARDS-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id