Biologic Augment of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Following Primary Lateral Patellofemoral Dislocation (BioPPD)
NCT ID: NCT06169800
Last Updated: 2025-10-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-15
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
JUPITER 4.0 - Risk Factors for Failure of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
NCT06883396
Computational Simulation of Patellar Instability
NCT02998372
Post-market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study of the Poly-Tape Devices for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) Reconstruction
NCT05264389
BioPoly® RS Partial Resurfacing Patella Registry Study
NCT02991300
BioBrace® Augmentation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures
NCT06948591
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patellofemoral instability is a well-recognized and common knee joint injury. Studies reporting the natural history after a first-time patellofemoral dislocation have reported a recurrence rate ranging from 10-80%. Recurrence varies depending on the unique pathoanatomic risk factors of each patient. Risk factors related to recurrence after a first-time dislocation include open growth plates, age at first dislocation, trochlear dysplasia, increased tibial tubercle - trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, contralateral dislocation, and patella alta. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis determined the redislocation rate in patients managed without surgery after a first-time dislocation was 30%.
The MPFL plays a critical role in the constraint of lateral translation of the patella, providing 50-60% of the soft tissue restraint in early flexion before the patella engages in the trochlear groove. Essentially, the MPFL guides and holds the patella in the trochlear groove, especially between 0-45 degrees of flexion. MPFL insufficiency is present in as many as 90% of acute patellar dislocations and up to 100% of recurrent cases. The traditional non-operative treatment for a first-time dislocation has been to splint the knee in extension, which may prevent further dislocation but does not reduce the patella in the trochlear groove so that the medial soft tissue can heal in an anatomic position.
Multiple studies have investigated operative and non-operative treatments that aim to reduce recurrence after a first-time patellofemoral dislocation. To date, the type of knee immobilization has not been demonstrated to influence the recurrence rate. Operative management has been investigated compared to traditional non-operative treatment. A systematic review tabulated 15 studies comparing MPFL repair to non-operative management demonstrated decreased re-dislocation rates and decreased knee pain in those with surgical repair. Liebensteiner et al. reviewed studies with level 1 or 2 evidence and concluded that there are mixed results and that consensus on the ideal management after a first-time dislocation is still unclear. Despite these published results, surgical treatment after a first-time dislocation has not found widespread acceptance.
Further trials have compared MPFL repair to MPFL reconstruction. Bitar et al. conducted a study of MPFL reconstruction compared to non-operative management using the current a la carte indications for isolated MPFL reconstruction. These authors concluded that MPFL reconstruction was superior for preventing re-dislocation of the patella. Another recent retrospective review of 76 patients with an osteochondral lesion followed for 2 years compared MPFL-R to MPFL repair or no treatment. This study determined that completing an MPFL-R at index surgery resulted in a 5-fold reduction in recurrent instability.
Synthetic products can be used as a graft to reconstruct an MPFL. A systematic review has reported good results at a minimum of 2 years post-operative. Most synthetic products available today to augment or enhance the repair of ligaments are designed to address only one of two failure mechanisms: they either add mechanical strength without biological healing or aid in remodelling the underlying tendon tissue without providing mechanical strength during surgical repair. The inability of current devices to both strengthen the repair and create a favourable healing environment for cellular infiltration and tissue growth has led to further innovation and the development of the Biobrace® implant by Biorez. The Biobrace® implant is intended for use in general surgical procedures to reinforce soft tissue where weakness exists. The Biobrace® implant is also designed to reinforce soft tissues repaired by suture or suture anchors during tendon or ligament repair surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MPFL repair with Biobrace augmentation
Patients presenting with first-time lateral patellofemoral dislocation within the previous 7 days will be offered a patellofemoral stabilization procedure, including knee arthroscopy and an MPFL repair augmented with Biobrace® synthetic ligament.
MPFL repair with Biobrace augmentation
MPFL repair with Biobrace augmentation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MPFL repair with Biobrace augmentation
MPFL repair with Biobrace augmentation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* First-time lateral patellofemoral dislocation in the previous 7 days
* Closed or closing growth plates (confirmed on knee x-rays with no change required for surgical technique)
Exclusion Criteria
* An osteochondral fracture of the patellofemoral joint that requires surgical repair
* Unable to complete computer-based outcome questionnaires
* Pregnant at the time of surgery
13 Years
30 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CONMED Corporation
INDUSTRY
Banff Sport Medicine Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laurie A Hiemstra, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Calgary
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Banff Sport Medicine
Canmore, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REB23-1095
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.