Cancer of Esophagogastric Junction: Optimized Sweet Versus Ivor-Lewis
NCT ID: NCT06162767
Last Updated: 2024-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-01
2028-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Observational Study to Compare Effectiveness and Safety of the Surgeries in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
NCT03428074
Esophagectomy: Sweet Versus Ivor-Lewis (ESVIL) (ECTOP-2001)
NCT01047111
Comparison of Long-term Survival and Quality of Life After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Versus Open Esophagectomy
NCT06147180
A Comparison Between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
NCT04217239
Minimally Invasive Sweet Esophagectomy for Patients With Siewert Type II Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction
NCT02741778
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ivor-Lewis Procedure
Arm A: Esophagectomy was conducted through right side thoracotomy plus midline laparotomy approach: Ivor-Lewis Procedure.
Esophagectomy by Ivor-Lewis Procedure
Esophagectomy was conducted by Ivor-Lewis Procedure.
Optimized Sweet Procedure
Arm B: Esophagectomy was conducted by single-incision thoracoscope combined with laparoscopy with the patient in a right oblique side position at 45 degrees: Optimized Sweet Procedure.
Esophagectomy by Optimized Sweet Procedure
Esophagectomy was conducted by Optimized Sweet Procedure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Esophagectomy by Ivor-Lewis Procedure
Esophagectomy was conducted by Ivor-Lewis Procedure.
Esophagectomy by Optimized Sweet Procedure
Esophagectomy was conducted by Optimized Sweet Procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Preoperative blood pressure controlled below 160/100 mmHg, blood glucose levels within 5.6 to 11.2 mmol/L, and normal functioning of major organs such as heart, lungs, liver, and kidneys. Main criteria include a Goldman cardiac risk index of grade 1 or 2; pulmonary function tests indicating predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \> 40%, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) ≥ 40%; total bilirubin \< 1.5 times the upper limit of normal; Alanine amioTransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Transaminase (AST) \< 2.5 times the upper limit of normal; creatinine ≤ 1.25 times the upper limit of normal and creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min;
3. Enhanced thin-slice CT scan of the thorax and abdomen showing a tumor with a maximum diameter not exceeding 5 cm, and lymph nodes in the thorax and abdomen with a short diameter not exceeding 1 cm, clinically staged as CT1-2N0-1M0 (8th edition JACC staging);
4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score of 0-1;
5. All relevant examinations completed within 14 days before surgery;
6. Patients capable of understanding the study and providing informed consent by signing the consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Louqian Zhang, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-186-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.