Study of Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Radiation Therapy Concurrent With Chemotherapy to Treat Esophageal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT01670409
Last Updated: 2022-01-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
85 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Simultaneous Modulated Accelerated Boost Versus Standard Dose Radiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer
NCT02556762
Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone for Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT03600831
Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiotherapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
NCT02429622
A Phase III Trail of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT02570893
Phase III Study of Neo-adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery for Squamous Cell Esophageal Cancer
NCT01216527
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Most patients with esophageal cancer suffer from malnutrition. A number of factors including hypoxic, inflammation, radioresistance and accelerated repopulation may contribute to local failures of disease after treatment; therefore a higher radiation biological equivalent dose (BED) will improve the local control probability. Although the intergroup 0123 (INT123) trial had shown that simply increasing total radiation dose could not gain better local control or overall survival rate, however, the ability of this trial to test the potential benefits of higher radiation dose could be compromized by the deficiencies within them, such as, observation bias,large radiated target volume and usage of conventional radiation technique. In other words, the probability that increasing radiation may help improving the control of disease should not be denied.
Modern radiation techniques, such as intensity modulation radiation therapy (IMRT), specially, are able to improve the coverage of target volumes and sparing of critical structures, while increase the total radiation dose. By using simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) technique, the doses to the relevant normal organs per fraction could be reduced significantly, while the doses to tumor could be increased to higher than 2Gy. Thus reach the double goal of protection of normal tissues, increasing total radiation Equivalent Uniform Dose (EUD). Dosimetric study has proven the feasibility and superiority of SMART-base IMRT in radiation treatment of esophageal cancer, compared with conventional technique.
Overall, SMART-base IMRT concurrent with chemotherapy may improve the local control and overall survival rate of patients with esophageal cancer; Meanwhile, the acute and late toxicities would be tolerable and slighter than that of conventional technique.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SMART combined with PF chemotherpay
SMART-base IMRT with concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy(cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil)
SMART
The PTV (planning target volume) of gross tumor will receive radiation dose of 66Gy, 2.2Gy per fraction and the PTV of subclinical disease will receive 54Gy, 1.8Gy per fraction,5 fraction per week.
PF
Concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy: Cisplatin, 80mg/m2, intravenous on day 1, 5fluorouracil 0.5/m2, intravenous on d1 to d4. Two cycles during radiation treatment on d1 and d28. Two additional cycles after radiation treatment, 4 weeks per cycle.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SMART
The PTV (planning target volume) of gross tumor will receive radiation dose of 66Gy, 2.2Gy per fraction and the PTV of subclinical disease will receive 54Gy, 1.8Gy per fraction,5 fraction per week.
PF
Concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy: Cisplatin, 80mg/m2, intravenous on day 1, 5fluorouracil 0.5/m2, intravenous on d1 to d4. Two cycles during radiation treatment on d1 and d28. Two additional cycles after radiation treatment, 4 weeks per cycle.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* the primary disease located in cervical, upper or middle thoracic esophagus
* no distant metastases
* zubrod performance status: 0\~2
* life expectancy \> 6 months; -absence of another malignancy
* adequate liver, renal and bone marrow function
* women of childbearing potential and male participants must practice adequate contraception
* patient must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry
Exclusion Criteria
* prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 2 years
* prior radiation therapy that would result in overlap of planned radiation therapy fields; - Severe, active comorbidity
* pregnancy or women of childbearing potential and men who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception
* women who are nursing
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chuangzhen Chen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chuangzhen Chen
M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chuangzhen Chen, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cancer Hospital, Shantou University Medical College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cancer Hospital, Shantou University Medical College
Shantou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Liu W, Zeng C, Wang S, Zhan Y, Huang R, Luo T, Peng G, Wu Y, Qiu Z, Li D, Wu F, Chen C. A combined predicting model for benign esophageal stenosis after simultaneous integrated boost in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients (GASTO1072). Front Oncol. 2022 Dec 22;12:1026305. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1026305. eCollection 2022.
Zhang WZ, Chen JZ, Li DR, Chen ZJ, Guo H, Zhuang TT, Li DS, Zhou MZ, Chen CZ. Simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy for esophageal cancer: a feasibility study. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13973-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13973.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ChiCTR-ONC-12002356
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
SUMC-ECA-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.