Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
51 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-14
2024-04-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Robot- assisted surgical system has opened a new era of minimally invasive surgery. Robot- assisted surgery offers some advantages including high- definition three- dimensional visualization and 7 degrees of freedom with the use of its surgical wrists, motion scaling, and tremor filtration, allowing the surgeon to perform complex operations comfortably in the domain of urinary tract, hepatobiliary and gynecological surgery. Although a robot-assisted thoraco- laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) was initiated from 2003, the published experience with RAMIE remains small, especially for Ivor- Lewis approaches. The aim of this study was to investigate the short- term and long-term outcomes of RAILE to identify any clinical or oncologic benefits of RAILE in esophageal cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison Between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
NCT04217239
Robot-assisted Thoraco-laparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy
NCT01544790
RAE Versus MIE in Patients With Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy
NCT06012214
RAMIE Versus MIE for Resectable Esophageal Cancer, a Randomized Controlled Trial (ROBOT-2 Trial).
NCT04306458
Robot-assisted Thoracic Approach Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy .
NCT04652180
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. All patients were within the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I to III
3. neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was offered to patients with T2-3 or N1-2 disease
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ruijin Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hecheng Li M.D., Ph.D
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yajie Zhang
Shanghai, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wee JO, Bravo-Iniguez CE, Jaklitsch MT. Early Experience of Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy With Circular End-to-End Stapled Anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.050. Epub 2016 May 4.
Park S, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, Park IK, Kim YT, Kang CH. Comparison of robot-assisted esophagectomy and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Oct;8(10):2853-2861. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.39.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RTS-003
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.