The Safety of S53P4 Bioactive Glass for Mastoid Obliteration

NCT ID: NCT06160388

Last Updated: 2025-07-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1196 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In recent years, mastoid obliteration (MO) after mastoidectomy has gained popularity. However, the choice for obliteration material has been a point of discussion. Autologous materials have the advantage of being freely available without cost.Synthetic materials on the other hand have unlimited supply, hold volume over time and have no risk of donor site morbidity. Comparative studies between materials are rare and the few available were unable to ascertain superiority.

Our hospital has been utilizing the same material for obliteration since 2011: S53P4 bioactive glass (BAG). It since has become our main operating procedure to obliterate the mastoid cavity with BAG granules following both canal wall up (CWU) and canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy. This bioactive glass has several important characteristics, such as the retaining of volume over time and antibacterial properties.

An important factor when selecting obliteration material is safety. Data on this was reported in several studies, but unfortunately these studies only investigated short-term safety in small and selected cohorts of patients, often without comparison. Additionally, large studies with extensive follow-up are necessary to detect rare complications and long-term pitfalls. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the safety of BAG in a cohort that encompasses all cases that underwent CWU+MO and CWD+MO in our institute and compare these results to a non-obliteration cohort. The main outcomes are short- and long-term safety, as indicated by surgical complications in the first year following surgery and revision surgeries during follow-up, respectively. The investigators will compare the obliteration cohort to the non-obliteration cohort, hypothesizing that obliteration results in a comparable or lower rate of complications and revision surgeries

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mastoid Cavity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients that underwent mastoidectomy + mastoid obliteration using bioactive glass

This is the intervention group, consisting of patients that have underwent either canal wall up or canal wall down mastoidectomy followed by obliteration of the mastoid cavity using S53P4 bioactive glass for any indication

S53P4 Bioactive glass

Intervention Type DEVICE

Following mastoidectomy, the mastoid cavity, and if the ossicular chain has been removed the epitympanum as well, are obliterated using S53P4 bioactive glass. The bioactive glass is mixed with saline and administered to the cavity, ensuring a tight fit.

Patients that underwent mastoidectomy alone

This is the control group, consisting of patients that have underwent either canal wall up or canal wall down mastoidectomy without mastoid obliteration for any indication

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

S53P4 Bioactive glass

Following mastoidectomy, the mastoid cavity, and if the ossicular chain has been removed the epitympanum as well, are obliterated using S53P4 bioactive glass. The bioactive glass is mixed with saline and administered to the cavity, ensuring a tight fit.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Canal wall up or canal wall down mastoidectomy
* Operated between 2010 and 2022
* All indications are included

Exclusion Criteria

* Other surgical techniques, such as subtotal petrosectomy
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

J.J. Quak, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Diakonessenhuis

Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-004-3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block and Cold Induced Headaches
NCT06310200 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1