Safety of Mid and Low Rectal Cancer Surgery Without Dissection of the No.253 Lymph Node (S-M-O-O-T-H)

NCT ID: NCT06146946

Last Updated: 2025-03-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1384 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-01

Study Completion Date

2029-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about whether it is safe to omit dissection of the No.253 lymph nodes in mid and low rectal cancer surgery. The main question it aims to answer is that if it is possible to achieve the same long-term survival with and without the dissection of the No.253 lymph node in mid and low rectal cancer surgery. Participants will underwent laparoscopic rectal radical resection with or without the dissection of the No.253 lymph node.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The No.253 lymph node, as the third station in the inferior mesenteric artery lymphatic system, plays a significant role in the lymphatic circulation of the descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum. They act as the last barrier for tumor metastasis from the regional to distant areas. However, there is still controversy regarding whether rectal cancer patients universally require dissection of the No.253 lymph node. The rate of metastasis to the No.253 lymph node in rectal cancer patients is extremely low, and dissection may not bring survival benefits. Additionally, postoperative urinary and sexual functions may be impaired due to damage to the sympathetic nerves. However, current prospective randomized controlled trials on the safety of omitting the dissection of the No.253 lymph node have small sample sizes and lack sufficient test power. Further confirmation is needed from large-sample prospective randomized controlled studies. Based on this, the investigator plans to collaborate with Peking Union Medical College Hospital, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, Fudan Cancer Hospital, and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, totaling eight medical centers, to conduct a prospective randomized controlled study. This study aims to confirm the safety of mid and low rectal surgery without dissection of the No.253 lymph node, providing high-level evidence-based medical evidence for the implementation of this surgical technique.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Omitting dissection of the No.253 lymph node

Perform surgery based on the principle of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME), without denuding the root of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery (IMA) and without dissection of the No.253 lymph node. Ligation of the IMA is performed at a low position distal to the origin of the left colonic artery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Omitting the dissection of the No.253 lymph node

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the experimental group, the surgery is performed without dissection of the No.253 lymph node.

Dissection of the No.253 lymph node

Perform surgery based on the principle of Total Mesorectal Excision (TME). During the procedure, fully expose the root of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery (IMA), thoroughly dissect the No.253 lymph node, and perform a high ligation along the artery at the root of the IMA; or expose the bifurcation of the left colonic artery, ligating the IMA at a low position distal to the origin of the left colonic artery, ensuring the dissection of the No. 253 lymph node while preserving the left colonic artery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dissection of the No.253 lymph node

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The range of the No.253 lymph node is as follows: medially, it extends from the root of the inferior mesenteric artery to the starting section of the left colonic artery; caudally, from the starting point of the left colonic artery to the intersection with the inferior mesenteric vein; laterally, it is bordered by the outer margin of the inferior mesenteric vein; and cranially, from the horizontal section of the duodenum to the beginning of the jejunum. In the controlled group, the surgery is performed with dissection of the No.253 lymph node.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dissection of the No.253 lymph node

The range of the No.253 lymph node is as follows: medially, it extends from the root of the inferior mesenteric artery to the starting section of the left colonic artery; caudally, from the starting point of the left colonic artery to the intersection with the inferior mesenteric vein; laterally, it is bordered by the outer margin of the inferior mesenteric vein; and cranially, from the horizontal section of the duodenum to the beginning of the jejunum. In the controlled group, the surgery is performed with dissection of the No.253 lymph node.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Omitting the dissection of the No.253 lymph node

In the experimental group, the surgery is performed without dissection of the No.253 lymph node.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient age between 18-75 years.
2. Colonic biopsy pathology confirms adenocarcinoma.
3. At initial treatment, colonoscopy and imaging diagnose the tumor's lower edge as less than or equal to 7cm from the anus.
4. At initial treatment, imaging diagnoses the tumor T stage as less than or equal to 3.
5. At initial treatment, imaging diagnoses no enlarged lymph nodes at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery.
6. At initial treatment, imaging diagnoses the number of mesenteric metastatic lymph nodes as less than or equal to three.
7. Strong willingness for surgery and signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous history of malignant colorectal tumors.
2. Colonic biopsy pathology reveals mucinous adenocarcinoma or signet ring cell carcinoma.
3. Imaging diagnosis of distant metastasis.
4. Patients who have undergone multiple abdominal-pelvic surgeries or have extensive abdominal adhesions.
5. Patients with complications such as intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, or intestinal bleeding requiring emergency surgery.
6. Extensive lesions not amenable to R0 resection.
7. Diagnosed with other malignancies within the past five years.
8. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification ≥ IV and/or ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status score ≥ 2.
9. Patients with severe liver, kidney, cardiac, pulmonary, coagulation dysfunctions, or serious underlying diseases that cannot tolerate surgery.
10. History of severe mental illness.
11. Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

China-Japan Friendship Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chinese PLA General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

West China Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

QIAN LIU

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Qian Liu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Science

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Beijing Cancer Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Chinese PLA General Hospital

Beijing, Beijng, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Beijing, Chaoyang District, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

West China Hospital Sichuan University

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mingguang Zhang, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

+8613261967603

Qian Liu, Dr.

Role: CONTACT

13601008906

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yi Xiao, Dr.

Role: primary

13366036387

Lei Zhou, Dr.

Role: primary

13910279583

Aiwen Wu, Dr.

Role: primary

13911577190

Xiaohui Du, Dr.

Role: primary

Qian Liu, M.D.

Role: primary

13601008906

Mingguang Zhang, M.D.

Role: backup

+8613261967603

Minhua Zheng

Role: primary

Xinxiang Li, Dr.

Role: primary

Ziqiang Wang, Dr.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCC4278

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.