Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Conjunction With Pulmonary Metastasectomy From Colorectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03113318

Last Updated: 2017-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2022-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To study whether or not total mediastinal lymph node dissection in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer is associated with improved survival compared to pulmonary metastasectomy only.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The question of lymph node sampling and/or involvement in pulmonary metastasectomy remains controversial. The performance of lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy is infrequent and varies between institutions. Of all the patients in The International Registry of Lung Metastases only 4,6% of patients underwent lymph node dissection. In a recent survey by Internullo and colleagues amongst the members of European Society of Thoracic Surgeons 55% perform mediastinal lymph node sampling whereas 33% perform no nodal sampling at all. The rate of lymph node involvement varies between primary tumours.

Several studies from groups that systematically perform mediastinal lymph node dissection in conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy have been published and in all studies the presence of lymph node metastasis emerges as an ominous prognostic factor. Ercan and colleagues found a 3-year survival of 69% for patients without lymph node involvement versus 38% in patients with positive lymph nodes. Saito and colleagues reported a 5-year survival of 53,6 for patients without hilar or mediastinal node involvement versus 6,2% at 4 years for patients with positive nodes. Bölükbas and colleagues reported a 5-year survival of 59% for patients without lymph node involvement in contrast to 23% for patients with lymph node involvement.

The rate of lymph node involvement is reported between 20-43% and risk factors for lymph node involvement include 2 or more metastases, prior liver metastases, rectum cancer and size of metastases .

Most of the above mentioned authors are in favor of mediastinal lymphadenectomy but also stress that the evidence available is not solid enough to make firm recommendations. In conclusion the literature is quite limited and of low-level evidence.

In remains unclear whether the complete removal of mediastinal lymph nodes is associated with a survival benefit or merely allows for a more accurate postoperative staging and guidance for additional oncological treatment. Thus, the aim of the following proposed study is to examine whether or not systemic lymph node dissection during pulmonary metastasectomy is associated with a survival benefit.

Hypothesis:

1. Systemic mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is feasible and safe.
2. Systemic mediastinal lymphadenectomy during pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent for CRC is associated with improved survival compared to only pulmonary metastasectomy.

Design:

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. No lymph node dissection versus systemic mediastinal lymph node dissection with en-bloc resection of lymph nodes and fatty tissue in station 2,4,7,8, 9 and 10 on the right side and 5,6,7,8, 9 and 10 on the left side during pulmonary metastasectomy for CRC.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Neoplasms Neoplasm Metastasis Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy

Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Total mediastinal lymph node dissection where all lymph nodes and fatty tissues is removed conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy only

Only pulmonary metastasectomy from colorectal cancer

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Only pulmonary metastasectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total mediastinal lymph node dissection and pulmonary metastasectomy

Total mediastinal lymph node dissection where all lymph nodes and fatty tissues is removed conjunction with pulmonary metastasectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Only pulmonary metastasectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* Able to give informed consent
* Willing to be randomized

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous mediastinal lymphadenectomy
* Previous pulmonary metastasectomy
* Evidence of other metastasetic disease
* Primary tumor is not under control
* Five metastases or more
* If final histologic examination of the resected lung lesion(s) reveals other histology than colorectal metastasis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kåre Hornbech

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kåre Hornbech, MD

Role: primary

+4535451212

Rene H Petersen, MD

Role: backup

+4535450525

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Internullo E, Cassivi SD, Van Raemdonck D, Friedel G, Treasure T; ESTS Pulmonary Metastasectomy Working Group. Pulmonary metastasectomy: a survey of current practice amongst members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Nov;3(11):1257-66. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31818bd9da.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18978560 (View on PubMed)

Ercan S, Nichols FC 3rd, Trastek VF, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Miller DL, Schleck CD, Pairolero PC. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis found during pulmonary metastasectomy for extrapulmonary carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 May;77(5):1786-91. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01200-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15111187 (View on PubMed)

Saito Y, Omiya H, Kohno K, Kobayashi T, Itoi K, Teramachi M, Sasaki M, Suzuki H, Takao H, Nakade M. Pulmonary metastasectomy for 165 patients with colorectal carcinoma: A prognostic assessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Nov;124(5):1007-13. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.125165.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12407386 (View on PubMed)

Bolukbas S, Sponholz S, Kudelin N, Eberlein M, Schirren J. Risk factors for lymph node metastases and prognosticators of survival in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jun;97(6):1926-32. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.026. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24681037 (View on PubMed)

Renaud S, Alifano M, Falcoz PE, Magdeleinat P, Santelmo N, Pages O, Massard G, Regnard JF. Does nodal status influence survival? Results of a 19-year systematic lymphadenectomy experience during lung metastasectomy of colorectal cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;18(4):482-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt554. Epub 2014 Jan 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24442624 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Khornbech

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.