Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2027-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Smartphone App-assisted PPI
NCT06094062
Evaluation of the National Randomized Proton Pump Inhibitor De-prescribing (RaPPID) Program
NCT03719170
Study Evaluating Pantoprazole Sodium Enteric-Coated Spheroid Suspension In Infants With Presumed GERD
NCT00259012
Gastric Acid Rebound Secretion Measured by Alkaline Tide
NCT01315444
Role of Pain Modulation in GERD Patients Who Failed Standard Dose PPI
NCT00539240
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the most frequent treatment of gastric acid related disorders. The use of PPIs is increasing, as well as concerns about their inappropriate use. Long-term use of PPIs has been associated with adverse events (e.g., nutritional deficiencies, osteoporosis, infections). Therefore, deprescribing (stopping or reducing dose) PPIs when they are not or no longer indicated is expected to benefit the patients. While general practitioners (GPs) and patients may be reluctant to deprescribing, studies suggest that clinicians would be more comfortable with deprescribing after additional training, and that patients' acceptance increases following recommendations from their doctor. This highlights the importance of providing GPs and patients with the necessary tools for safe deprescribing. In Switzerland, there is evidence of PPI use without adequate indication or dose.
In the pilot survey conducted within the current project, which involved 48 GPs, 55% of them reported often encountering patients who were prescribed inappropriate PPIs, and 58% expressed a desire for a PPI deprescribing guideline. Optimizing PPI use in Switzerland is needed and of interest. Therefore, the investigators aim to conduct a clinical trial to evaluate an intervention to guide deprescribing of inappropriate PPIs. Additionally, alongside the trial, there will be an integrated process evaluation of the intervention, and a cost-effectiveness evaluation.
Study design:
This interventional, open-labelled, cluster-randomized controlled trial in Swiss primary care setting, aims to evaluate an intervention to guide deprescribing of inappropriate PPIs. In this trial, adult patients with inappropriate PPI prescription will be recruited by GPs in the German speaking part of Switzerland. Based on 1:1 cluster randomization of GPs, patients will be assigned to either the control group or to the group receiving an intervention to guide deprescribing of inappropriate PPIs. The control group will receive usual care. The investigators will compare the effectiveness and safety of the intervention with usual care, over a 12-month follow-up period. Alongside the trial, an integrated process evaluation of the intervention and a cost-effectiveness evaluation will be conducted.
Objectives:
The main goal of this study is to evaluate an intervention to guide deprescribing of inappropriate PPIs. Therefore, the main trial aims to investigate if the study intervention leads to the deprescribing of inappropriate PPI prescription (i.e., effectiveness of the intervention), while ensuring noninferiority safety, in comparison to usual care. Additionally, the trial aims to investigate its impact on other clinical aspects, like the number of medications used, the health-related quality of life, and additional safety endpoints.
Alongside the main trial, an integrated process evaluation of the intervention aims to evaluate the quality of the implementation, as well as GPs' and patients' acceptance and fidelity to the intervention, patient typology, and the mechanisms supporting or hindering the success of the intervention.
Also, alongside the main trial, a cost-effectiveness evaluation aims to investigate the cost implications of the
Statistical considerations:
Statistical methods for the main trial The prescribed PPI dose will be quantified using the defined daily dose (DDD). To quantify its change the investigators will 1) estimate the average PPI dose over the 12 months of follow-up using the area under the curve divided by the time under observation and, 2) calculate the relative change from baseline as one minus the ratio between the average prescription and the baseline prescription level. The difference in the change in prescribed PPI dose between the two groups will be calculated using a linear model, adjusted for the baseline dose and including a random effect for the cluster. The difference in the change in upper gastrointestinal symptoms between the two groups will be calculated from a repeated-measures linear mixed-effects model, adjusted for the baseline value and including the intervention group, the timepoint, and the interaction between group and timepoint as fixed effects. Effects of the cluster and patient will be added as random effects. Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses need to meet non-inferiority to claim success for the co-primary safety endpoint.
Statistical analyses for other endpoints Repeatedly measured continuous secondary endpoints will be analyzed using the same model as for the safety co-primary endpoint. Count endpoints will be analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model and a negative binomial distribution, including the random effect of the cluster and the time of observation as an offset. Binary endpoints assessed at the end of the follow-up period will be analysed using mixed effects logistic regression, adjusted for the time under observation and including the random effect of the cluster.
Statistical methods for the integrated process evaluation of the intervention The process evaluation will be done based on the Medical Research Council's evaluation framework for complex interventions. Adherence to deprescribing decisions will be investigated using temporal dynamics modelling. Mechanisms of impact will be investigated based on the health action process approach, an established health behaviour change theory. The qualitative part will consist of semi-structured in-depth interviews with both patients and GPs.
Statistical methods for the cost-effectiveness evaluation Health economic analysis will be performed from a Swiss statutory health insurance perspective with a primary time horizon. QALYs will be estimated as the area under the survival curve resulting from utility estimates obtained for the different assessment timepoints during the trial. Utilities will be derived from EQ- 5D-5L questionnaire responses based on published valuation algorithms. A regression-based approach to assess intervention effects will be adopted due to the clustered nature of the trial data and possibility of residual baseline imbalances. The investigators will use Generalized Structural Equation Models (GSEMs), which will allow to simultaneously estimate incremental costs and QALYs (i.e., the intervention effects on costs and QALYs in the regression models), while accounting for the clustered nature of the data.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DROPIT Intervention
The study intervention is a patient-centred PPI deprescribing intervention aiming to guide GPs and patients through the process of safely deprescribing inappropriate PPIs.
Proton Pump Inhibitor deprescribing tool
The intervention is targeted to the Swiss Primary care practice. It involves educational material and resources to guide the safe deprescribing of inappropriate PPIs, for both general practitioners and patients.
Usual Care
The reference or control arm will receive usual care. This means that the GPs and patients in this group will conduct their clinical practice as per usual, without receiving the intervention from the study team.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Proton Pump Inhibitor deprescribing tool
The intervention is targeted to the Swiss Primary care practice. It involves educational material and resources to guide the safe deprescribing of inappropriate PPIs, for both general practitioners and patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age ≥18 years old.
3. Daily PPI intake for ≥8 weeks.
4. PPI twice a day or in a dose as:
* 40mg/day pantoprazole;
* 40mg/day omeprazole; \>30mg/day lansoprazole; \>30mg/day dexlansoprazole; \>20mg/day esomeprazole; \>20mg/day rabeprazole.
5. Sufficient knowledge of German language to understand the trial and follow-up according to GP assessment.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Unable to provide informed consent.
3. PPI in an appropriate dose (see Appendix Table A1) and with an established indication for long-term PPI, such as:
* History of bleeding ulcer.
* Peptic ulcer due to cause other than NSAID or H. Pylori.
* Barrett's oesophagus.
* Severe erosive reflux disease (Los Angeles grade C/D).
* GERD with symptoms or complications (oesophageal ulcer, peptic stricture).
* Other indications (i.e., Zollinger-Ellison-Syndrome, PPI-sensitive eosinophilic esophagitis, chronic pancreatitis with steatorrhea refractory to enzyme replacement therapy, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.)
4. Two or more of the following medications, or one of the following medications and one or more of the below risk factors.
Medications (any dose):
* Daily use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) \>7 days.
* Antiplatelet therapy.
* Additional antiplatelet therapy (e.g., ticagrelor or similar).
* Anticoagulant(s).
* Systemic steroid(s) \>1 month.
Risk factors:
* History of gastrointestinal ulcer.
* Age ≥65 years.
* Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use.
* Severe concomitant disease with increased risk of GI bleeding according to the GP's assessment (e.g., severe liver disease, neoplasia, nicotine or alcohol abuse).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Swiss National Science Foundation
OTHER
University of Zurich
OTHER
University of Basel
OTHER
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
OTHER
Patientenstelle Zürich
UNKNOWN
Patientenstelle Basel
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
OTHER
University of Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sven Streit, Prof. Dr. med. Dr. phil
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Bern, Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Prof. Dr. med. Dr. phil. Sven Streit
Bern, , Switzerland
University of Bern
Bern, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schulthess-Lisibach AE, Luthold RV, Tombez C, Weir KR, Zangger M, Chan S, Jenal F, Roumet M, Mattmann Y, Bieri C, Aubert CE, Rodondi N, Zambrano Ramos SC, Trelle S, Neuner-Jehle S, Juillerat P, Barbier M, Inauen J, Streit S, Jungo KT, Vallejo-Yague E. DepRescribing inapprOpriate Proton Pump InhibiTors (DROPIT): study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Swiss primary care. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e094495. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094495.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DROPIT Trial_v1.0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.