Comparison of Two Different Lightwand Intubation Techniques in Cervical Immobilized Patients

NCT ID: NCT06119360

Last Updated: 2023-11-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

176 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-12

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares two different approaches of lightwand intubation techniques in cervical immobilized patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study compares two approaches in lightwand intubation techniques in cervical immobilized patients. One is a conventional approach that involves scooping movement with mandible protraction. The other is a face-to-face approach that inserts lightwand with a front-facing position. This study is conducted as a randomized, prospective, single-blinded design.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation; Difficult or Failed

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group Conventional

Conventional approach using group in lightwand intubation

Group Type OTHER

Conventional approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients were positioned supine and the intubator stood above the patient's head. Opening the mouth and slightly pulling the mandible with one hand, the intubator inserted the lightwand-tracheal tube assembly at midline into the patient's mouth under the ambient light being turned off. To identify the location of the lighted tip, the intubator could move the lightwand back and forth gently, Once the red light of the tip was located at the midline of the patient's neck, the pre-launched tube was inserted smoothly into the patient's airway unless there was no resistance

Group Face-to-Face

Face-to-face approach using group in lightwand intubation

Group Type OTHER

Face-to-face approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A front-facing approach and insert the lightwand following the patient's tongue base curvature without scooping movement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Face-to-face approach

A front-facing approach and insert the lightwand following the patient's tongue base curvature without scooping movement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional approach

Patients were positioned supine and the intubator stood above the patient's head. Opening the mouth and slightly pulling the mandible with one hand, the intubator inserted the lightwand-tracheal tube assembly at midline into the patient's mouth under the ambient light being turned off. To identify the location of the lighted tip, the intubator could move the lightwand back and forth gently, Once the red light of the tip was located at the midline of the patient's neck, the pre-launched tube was inserted smoothly into the patient's airway unless there was no resistance

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adults with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3
* patients who received scheduled spine surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with body mass index \<18.5 kg/m2 or \>35.0 kg/m2,
* patients who previously had head and neck surgery,
* patients who are at high risk of aspiration,
* patients with pathologic conditions such as tumors, polyps, or inflammation in the airway,
* patients who cannot sit due to severe spine deformity,
* patients who have compromised cardiopulmonary function patients with clinically significant neurovascular disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hyungseok Seo

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hyungseok Suh

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong-gu

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kyung Hee University Gangdong Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KHNMC 2018-10-011-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.