Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy vs. Surgical Tracheostomy in Neurocritically Ill Patients - a Retrospective Study

NCT ID: NCT06018220

Last Updated: 2024-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

383 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-27

Study Completion Date

2024-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present quality study is to examine the relationship between choice of tracheotomy procedure and complications in a neurocritically ill patient population at a single center. Secondary outcomes are the influence of clinician skill level (for PDTs), time from admission to tracheostomy, length of stay and time to decannulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neurocritically ill patients often require placement of a tracheostomy at some point during admission, as impaired consciousness and insufficient protective airway reflexes often make weaning from mechanical ventilation prolonged.

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) with fiberoptic visualization can be performed bedside by neurointensivists or residents under supervision, unless there are contraindications. However, concerns regarding tracheal stenosis following PDT have been raised. This a rare complication but when it occurs it is a severe long-term complication, and the patients are often in need of repeated interventions. The alternative is surgical tracheostomy (ST) which is more resource intensive but perceived as safer in high risk patients. The indication for tracheostomy (and the choice of procedure) is ultimately based on judgement of clinical team.

Systematic reviews have found no difference between PDT and ST regarding severe complications, apart from a higher incidence of wound infections after ST. However, a higher incidence of complications following PDT has been reported when residents are performing the procedure, suggesting an influence of physician skill level.

Methods:

This is a retrospective observational single-center quality study. All patients \> 18 years of age admitted to the Neurointensive Care Unit at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen between January 2018 and December 2022 with a registered procedure code for either PDT or ST wil be included. Approval from departmental leadership and The Judicial Department at Rigshopitalet has been attained. Data will be extracted from the electronical medical records and any short (\< 1 week) or long-term complications will be registered. The follow-up period is 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tracheostomy Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients admitted to Neurointensive Care Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark AND having a tracheostomy performed during their stay.

\-

Exclusion Criteria

Children - age \< 18.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Birgitte Majholm

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Martin K Soerensen, PHD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Department of Neruoanaesthesiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Martin K soerensen, PHD

Role: CONTACT

+45 35457009

Martin K Soerensen, PHD

Role: CONTACT

+ 45 3545 7009

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Martin Kryspin Soerensen, PHD

Role: primary

+45 35457009

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NEU6021

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Percutaneous Tracheostomy
NCT05343442 COMPLETED PHASE4