Cerebellar Involvement in Cognitive Sequencing

NCT ID: NCT06108336

Last Updated: 2026-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-01

Study Completion Date

2027-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Although there is increasing recognition that the cerebellum is involved in cognition as well as motor function, the manner in which the cerebellum contributes to cognition is uncertain. One theory that might account for both motor and cognitive contributions of the cerebellum is that the cerebellum is involved in sequencing of relevant events or stimuli. Previous experiments have suggested that disruption of the cerebellum impairs the prediction of the next event in a sequence. The present experiment will examine the impact of cerebellar stimulation on brain activation during the performance of both sequence-demanding and non-sequence-demanding tasks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Although there is increasing recognition that the cerebellum, which contains half of the brain's neurons, is involved in cognition as well as motor function, the manner in which the cerebellum contributes to cognition is uncertain. The uniform circuitry of the cerebellum and the extensive connectivity of the cerebellum with numerous neocortical regions has suggested to some researchers that there is a common computation that the cerebellum performs for both motor and cognitive functions. The cerebellar sequencing hypothesis posits that the cerebellum acquires sequence information, makes sequence predictions, and detects sequence violations. These functions, executed via a forward model, could underlie cerebellar involvement in both motor and cognitive behavior. In motor control, such predictions can be used to guide limb trajectory without reliance on movement-generated sensory feedback. In cognition, sequencing requirements are prominent in both verbal working memory (VWM) and language acquisition; eg, in VWM, keeping a phone number in mind requires encoding and rehearsing a sequence of digits. In language, words consist of sequences of syllables, and the learning of syllable transition probabilities is an important component of recognizing legal words in a language. Importantly, prominent cerebellar activation has been observed in many functional MRI (fMRI) VWM and language studies. However, the brainstem/cerebellar neural correlates of sequencing in cognition, and the influence of cerebellar sequence predictions on neocortical targets, are poorly understood. In this experiment, studying healthy individuals the investigators will Investigate the cerebellum as a source of sequence prediction and its influence on forebrain areas. The cerebellum is hypothesized to provide its forward model sequence prediction to forebrain targets, but to date no study has attempted to visualize with concurrent TMS/fMRI the consequences of disrupting this cerebellar input on forebrain activation. In the investigators previous work, the investigators show that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during the rehearsal of a sequence of letters results in errors in determining if a probe letter matches the next letter in the sequence, suggesting that TMS disrupted this predictive input. In accordance with this finding, the investigators hypothesize that, using concurrent TMS/fMRI, TMS disruption during a sequencing task will produce greater changes in neocortical activation relative to an analogous control task that does not have the predictive component brought out by sequencing demands. The investigators further hypothesize that different patterns of neocortical activations in response to cerebellar TMS will be observed depending on whether a probe letter matches the expected next letter in a sequence.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Effects of Cerebellar Stimulation on Brain Activation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Cerebellar and Occipital stimulation groups will be tested under sequence-demanding and non-sequence demanding tasks (in counterbalanced order)
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cerebellar Stimulation

TMS will be administered to the cerebellum on half the trials of a sequence-demanding task, and on half the trials of a non-sequence-demanding task. Task order will be counterbalanced.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

TMS during sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS is administered during the execution of sequence-demanding task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe and non-invasive technique for transiently modulating brain activity

No TMS during sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS is not administered during the execution of sequence-demanding task.

TMS during non-sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS is administered during the execution of non-sequence-demanding task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe and non-invasive technique for transiently modulating brain activity

No TMS during non-sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS is not administered during the execution of non-sequence-demanding task

Occipital Stimulation

TMS will be administered to an occipital control region on half the trials of a sequence-demanding task, and on half the trials of a non-sequence-demanding task. Task order will be counterbalanced.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TMS during sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS is administered during the execution of sequence-demanding task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe and non-invasive technique for transiently modulating brain activity

No TMS during sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS is not administered during the execution of sequence-demanding task.

TMS during non-sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS is administered during the execution of non-sequence-demanding task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe and non-invasive technique for transiently modulating brain activity

No TMS during non-sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS is not administered during the execution of non-sequence-demanding task

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TMS during sequence-demanding task

TMS is administered during the execution of sequence-demanding task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe and non-invasive technique for transiently modulating brain activity

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No TMS during sequence-demanding task

TMS is not administered during the execution of sequence-demanding task.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

TMS during non-sequence-demanding task

TMS is administered during the execution of non-sequence-demanding task. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe and non-invasive technique for transiently modulating brain activity

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

No TMS during non-sequence-demanding task

TMS is not administered during the execution of non-sequence-demanding task

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\) Age 18-50;
* 2\) educational attainment of at least 8 years;
* 3\) capable of giving informed consent;
* 4\) fluent speaker of English by self-report;
* 5\) right handed.

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\) illicit drug use within 30 days of MRI scanning;
* 2\) neurological or systemic disorder which can cause dementia or cognitive dysfunction;
* 3\) history of an Axis I psychiatric disorder including substance use disorder;
* 4\) history of definite stroke;
* 5\) focal lesion on MRI exam;
* 6\) uncorrected visual deficits by self-report
* 7\) contraindications for MRI scanning
* 8\) use of anxiolytic, antidepressant, neuroleptic, or sedative medication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John E Desmond, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

John E Desmond, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

410-502-3583

JoAnna Mathena, MS

Role: CONTACT

443-571-0947

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

John E. Desmond, Ph.D.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01MH128278

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB00328214

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spectral Characteristics of Memory Transformation
NCT05946616 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Basic Experimental Study of Hippocampal Memory Functions
NCT05945628 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Studying Motor Neuron Tests
NCT01517087 COMPLETED