Artificial Intelligence to Improve Detection and Risk Stratification of Acute Pulmonary Embolism (AID-PE)
NCT ID: NCT06093217
Last Updated: 2025-02-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
3872 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-01-08
2025-02-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
\[Question 1\] What is the real-world impact of AI on the clinical outcomes and decision making by radiologists and clinicians in the management of acute PE?
\[Question 2\] Is AI software for the detection of acute PE acceptable to use in clinical practice and do they have a favourable impact on clinical workload?
\[Question 3\] Is it cost-effective to implement AI software for the detection of acute PE in clinical practice?
Patients having a CTPA for the detection of acute PE will have their imaging analysed by AI software in combination with a human radiologist. Researchers will aim to compare the clinical and radiology specific outcomes with a retrospective cohort of patients who have had standard routine radiology reporting.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Adverse Outcome of Acute Pulmonary Embolism by Artificial Intelligence System Based on CT Pulmonary Angiography
NCT05482269
Chinese PE Multimodality Imaging Artificial Intelligence Study
NCT06526468
Data Clustering Study With Artificial Intelligence and Phenotyping of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism
NCT06183944
Artificial Intelligence to StrategiCally Enhance Pulmonary Embolism Response Team Activation
NCT06246045
Prognostic Tools in Patients With Acute Pulmonary Thromboembolism.
NCT04237974
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
ESC/ERS guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute PE also advise on the importance of risk stratification. An increased right ventricle: left ventricle (RV:LV) ratio \>1.0 on Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram (CTPA) is associated 2.5-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality, and 5-fold risk for PE-related mortality. This metric is intended to help clinicians distinguish between patients with high and low risk acute PE. Patients stratified as high risk (RV:LV ratio \>1.0) necessitate closer monitoring within an inpatient setting. Whereas, patients stratified as low risk (RV:LV ratio \<1.0) are suitable for early discharge through ambulatory pathways.
Therefore, the provision of RV:LV metrics within radiology reporting has potentially important clinical implications. If clinicians are not provided with any quantifiable evidence of RV dysfunction on which to base their treatment decisions, patients with high risk acute PE may be unintentionally considered 'low risk' and discharged home. Furthermore, patients with low risk acute PE may be subject to longer, and potentially unnecessary, inpatient stays which undoubtedly contributes to the cost of healthcare. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology within radiology reporting of CTPAs for acute PE could be a potential solution to address this challenge.
AI is an increasingly attractive technology within healthcare. It describes a number of computer software techniques which mimic human cognitive function. AI shows promise in ability to detect and risk stratify acute PE. However, most studies have been conducted in retrospective cohorts. Furthermore, no study current has addressed the health economic impact of implementing AI technology within the real-world reporting of acute PE.
This observational study will be led by Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust (RUH). The aim of this study is to integrate Artificial Intelligence and machine learning technology within the reporting of CTPAs for acute PE. The investigators hypothesise that AI technology can improve the prompt diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of acute PE within a real-world clinical setting. The investigators also hypothesis that integration of AI technology is cost-effective, and acceptable to radiologists and clinicians.
Patients whose scans will be included in the study will be all those consecutively presenting to the RUH with a possible diagnosis of acute PE for 12 months before (comparator cohort) and 12 months after (intervention cohort) 'live' introduction of integrated AI technology reporting. For all recruited participants, an anonymised clinician case report form will be used to capture details relating to their demographics, clinical-radiological PE severity, their management, and outcomes including mortality at 12 months.
At the point of analysis, the investigators will perform adjustments/matching between the two cohorts for patient baseline characteristics. The investigators will also adjust for calendar time of recruitment, to account for temporal trends. Analysis between both cohorts will also allow development of a decision analysis model to assess the cost-effectiveness of integrated AI technology within CTPA report for acute PE. Clinician and radiologist questionnaires will be used to assess user acceptability.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prospective Cohort: 'Live' Introduction of AI technology
Consecutive CTPAs, for patients with suspected acute PE, which have their imaging interpreted 'live' by AI technology. The radiologist will have ultimate responsibility for the report generated.
Artificial Intelligence
AI technology will generate a report with relevant key slice imaging identifying the presence of an acute pulmonary embolism and RV:LV ratio measurements to the radiologist
Comparator Cohort: Standard Radiology reporting
Retrospective CTPAs, for patients with suspected acute PE, which have been reported by a human radiologist only.
These CTPAs will not be interpreted by AI technology 'live' BUT undergo analysis to help assess the sensitivity, specificity, false negative, false positive rates of AI technology.
Artificial Intelligence
AI technology will generate a report with relevant key slice imaging identifying the presence of an acute pulmonary embolism and RV:LV ratio measurements to the radiologist
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Artificial Intelligence
AI technology will generate a report with relevant key slice imaging identifying the presence of an acute pulmonary embolism and RV:LV ratio measurements to the radiologist
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient requiring CTPA to exclude or diagnose acute PE
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have registered with the national opt-out scheme for research
* CTPA performed for reasons other than acute PE
* CTPA performed for acute PE but reported by external radiologists
* Incomplete or discontinued CTPA scans
* Insufficient quality CTPA to allow for analysis by a radiologist
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bath
OTHER
University of Bristol
OTHER
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
OTHER
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jonathan Rodrigues, MBBS FRCR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal United Hospitals, Bath NHS Foundation Trust
Bath, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
311735
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2720
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.