Laser Vaporization of the Prostate: Comparing Between Ejaculatory Preserving and Non-ejaculatory Preserving Technique
NCT ID: NCT06091618
Last Updated: 2024-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2024-04-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ejaculation Preserving Photoselective Vaporization Versus Plasma Kinetic Vaporization Versus Transurethral Resection Of The Prostate: A RCT
NCT03589196
Ejaculatory Sparing Transurethral Incision Of The Prostate (ES-TUIP) Versus Conventional TUIP
NCT03176017
High Power Thulium Vaporization vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Treatment of BPH
NCT03264482
Is Ejaculation Preservation TURis the Natural Evolution of the "Gold Standard".
NCT06263049
Bipolar Resection vs Enucleation of Prostate
NCT06983444
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The prevalence of histologically diagnosed (BPH) increases from 8% in men aged 31 to 40 years old to 40-50% in men aged 51 to 60 years old. This increases to over 80% in men older than 80 years old.
Bladder outlet obstructions (BOO) are one of the major disorders in the aging male, The most common aetiology of BOO in elderly men above the age of 60 years is (BPH), but younger men (\< 50 years old) can also experience infra vesical obstruction from a small but obstructive prostate.
Ejaculation is one of the fundamental domains of male sexual function An almost inevitable adverse event of the conventional TURP is the loss of antegrade ejaculation, seen in 65%-80% of patients.
The use of alpha receptor antagonists is also known to cause a loss in antegrade ejaculation. Aside from peri- and postoperative morbidities, such as bleeding and TURP syndrome, the loss of ejaculation represents a major reason for the avoidance of surgical treatment. This is a particular issue among young people who hesitate to agree to the TURP procedure due to the fear of loss of ejaculation. Losing the ability to ejaculate often leads to a subsequent decrease in sexual pleasure, which has psychosocial implications but can also impact on aspects related to their cultural background, desire for children, and sexual life.
According to the current theory of ejaculation, the loss of antegrade ejaculation is attributed to the loss of bladder neck function after resection.
Even though TURP has a high success rate, the perioperative morbidity and operative safety specially in relation to bleeding pose serious concerns In addition to bleeding, retrograde ejaculation and TURP syndrome due to irrigant absorption are also relevant to intra and postoperative complications.
Despite technical advancements in TURP, blood transfusion rates are still 2 % to 7 %, TUR syndrome occurs in 2 %, stress urinary incontinence in 2 %, retrograde ejaculation in 65 % to 70.0%, urethral strictures in 4 %, bladder neck contractures in 4 % and early revision rates are 3 % to 5 %. These, along with prolonged catheterization time, advocate for alternatives to this treatment modality that offer similar clinical results but fewer complications
Laser vaporization of prostate is one of these methods. Lasers generate different effects in tissues, like coagulation and vaporization. Different types of laser like potassium-titanyl phosphate (KTP), holmium, diode and thulium are available. Of these, those gaining more popularity are the photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) using the KTP laser, and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP).
The semiconductor diode laser is thought to be the best in relation to its haemostatic properties, but due to postoperative dysuria, pain, and storage urinary symptoms, it was less acceptable , A newly introduced diode laser, operating on the wavelength of 980 nm, is different in terms of its new fiber design, greater ablative properties of tissues, and efficient haemostasis due to its significant simultaneous absorption in water and Haemoglobin
The conventional technique of laser prostatectomy is traditionally performed with careful vaporization of apical tissue around the verumontanum.
To preserve the antegrade ejaculation, the paracollicular and the situated tissue, which is located 1 cm proximal to the verumontanum should not be vaporized. This is mainly related to the importance of the musculus ejaculatorius and verumontanum for ejaculation.
Based on this clearer understanding of the process of ejaculation, a new technique of trans urethral laser vaporization of the prostate , termed ejaculation-preserving technique was developed with the overarching aim of preserving antegrade ejaculation with comparable functional outcome for micturition parameters to regular technique.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Exclusion criteria
* Major psychiatric and somatic diseases and the use of drugs that affect sexual function
* Patients with ejaculatory dysfunction or no ejaculation
* Patients with documented or suspected prostate cancer
* Patients with neurogenic bladder, voiding dysfunction, urethral strictures, and malignancies of the upper or lower urinary tract,
* Prostates sized more than 80 CC, severe comorbidities or high surgical risk patients.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
new technique of ejaculatory preserving laser vaporization prostatectomy
laser will be employed to preform vaporization. The ejaculatory preserving procedure will be done in the following steps:
1. Setting a mark cut 1 cm proximal of the verumontanum as orientation.
2. Complete resection of the middle lobe to the abovementioned mark.
3. Vaporization of lateral lobes to the capsule and the ventral side to the level of the verumontanum with avoidance of paracollicular digging.
4. Circular resection of the internal bladder neck.
5. Apical resection utilizing the colliculus seminalis as a distal resection border and maintaining a 1cm safety area for preservation of ejaculation.
6. Total removal of prostate cuts and final check to confirm that there are no obstructive components.
new technique of ejaculatory preserving laser prostatectomy
laser will be employed to preform vaporization. The ejaculatory preserving procedure will be done in the following steps:
Setting a mark cut 1 cm proximal of the verumontanum as orientation. Complete resection of the middle lobe to the abovementioned mark. Vaporization of lateral lobes to the capsule and the ventral side to the level of the verumontanum with avoidance of paracollicular digging.
Circular resection of the internal bladder neck. Apical resection utilizing the colliculus seminalis as a distal resection border and maintaining a 1cm safety area for preservation of ejaculation.
Total removal of prostate cuts and final check to confirm that there are no obstructive components.
conventional technique laser vaporization prostatectomy
non ejaculatory preserving laser vaporization of the prostate
conventional technique of laser vaporization of the prostate
conventional laser vaporization of the prostate
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
new technique of ejaculatory preserving laser prostatectomy
laser will be employed to preform vaporization. The ejaculatory preserving procedure will be done in the following steps:
Setting a mark cut 1 cm proximal of the verumontanum as orientation. Complete resection of the middle lobe to the abovementioned mark. Vaporization of lateral lobes to the capsule and the ventral side to the level of the verumontanum with avoidance of paracollicular digging.
Circular resection of the internal bladder neck. Apical resection utilizing the colliculus seminalis as a distal resection border and maintaining a 1cm safety area for preservation of ejaculation.
Total removal of prostate cuts and final check to confirm that there are no obstructive components.
conventional technique of laser vaporization of the prostate
conventional laser vaporization of the prostate
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* International prostate symptoms score (IPSS) \>14 points
* Normal PSA (PSA\<4 ng / ml or free/ total PSA \>0.25)
* Prostate size \< 80 gm
* Men with recurrent urinary retention (drug-refractory), urinary infection, or haematuria who had failed standard medical therapy (alpha-blockers, 5-alpha reductive inhibitors)
* Patients were also required to have an active and healthy sexual life, the ability to ejaculate and a desire to preserve ejaculation
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with ejaculatory dysfunction or no ejaculation
* Patients with documented or suspected prostate cancer
* Patients with neurogenic bladder, voiding dysfunction, urethral strictures, and malignancies of the upper or lower urinary tract,
* Prostates sized more than 80 CC, severe comorbidities or high surgical risk patients.
45 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ain Shams University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ain Shams University Hospital
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Ahmed Emam, PHD
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
ahmed emam, doctorate
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Elshazly M, Sultan S, Shaban M, Zanaty F. Evaluation of a novel technique of bladder neck and supramontanal sparing ejaculatory preserving transurethral prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2021 Nov;39(11):4215-4219. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03752-z. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
Brant A, Cho A, Posada Calderon L, Te A, Kashanian J, Chughtai B. Ejaculatory Hood-Sparing Vaporization of the Prostate and Its Impact on Erectile, Ejaculatory, and Sexual Function. Urology. 2020 Oct;144:177-181. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.072. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ejaculatory sparing laser turp
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.