Resting Full-cycle Ratio in Side Branch

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

286 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-08

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate diagnostic performance of resting full-cycle rate (RFR) in side branch lesion.

We aims to evaluate whether the diagnostic performance of RFR in the side branch lesion is non-inferior compared to that in the main vessel lesion RFR and FFR measurements will be performed to define functional significance in patients with side branch lesion with or without main vessel lesion

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Fractional Flow Reserve-guided Provisional Side Branch Intervention

NCT00351780

Coronary Artery Disease

COMPLETED PHASE4

Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio

NCT06305572

Coronary Artery Disease

COMPLETED

Resting Full-cycle Ratio (RFR)-Guided Revascularization

NCT06075160

Coronary Artery Disease

RECRUITING

Influence of FFR on the Clinical Outcome After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

NCT01873560

Coronary Disease

COMPLETED

Diagnostic Performance of On-site Automatic Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve

NCT06153927

Coronary Artery Disease

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The presence of myocardial ischemia is the most important prognostic indicator in patients with coronary artery disease. Pressure-based functional assessment has been recommended to assess the presence of myocardial ischemia due to low accuracy of image-based assessment in intermediate coronary artery disease. Selective revascularization for only ischemia-producing lesion with fractinal flow reserve(FFR) guidance proved to decrease adverse cardiac events and avoid unnecessary coronary stenting, compared to angiography-guided revascularization. Therefore, Current guidelines strongly recommend FFR measurement for the assessment of the functional severity of moderate stenosis of a culprit lesion in stable coronary artery disease, and non-culprit lesion in acute coronary syndrome. However, it's clinical adaption in a real world was still very low, because of the need of pressure wire and hyperemic agent. Instantaneous flow ratio (iFR), which the ratio of distal coronary artery pressure to aortic pressure during wave-free period at rest, had a high diagnostic accuracy to define functional significance without need of adenosine. According to two large randomized trials, iFR-guided coronary revascularization proved to be non-inferior to FFR-guided revascularization with respect to one-year risk of major adverse cardiac events. Recently, new adenosine-free index, called as a resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), which is completely independent of the ECG and irrespective of systole or diastole has been validated to detect myocardial ischemia. RFR is not limited by sensitive land marking of components of the pressure waveform unlike iFR, and is diagnostically equivalent to iFR.

This novel physiologic index without need of adenosine have a potential to widely spread of functional assessment for coronary artery stenosis in daily clinical practice, and simplify procedure in complex coronary artery disease. Therefore, we sought to investigate diagnostic performance of this novel physiologic index to define myocardial ischemia in coronary bifurcation lesion, which is one of complex lesion subset.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Resting full-cycle ration (RFR) measurments

RFR and FFR measurements in main vessel and side branch lesions

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

fractional flow ratio (FFR) measurments

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with side branch lesion, who need functional evaluation

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF \<30%)
* Culprit vessel in acute coronary syndrome
* Donor vessel to supply chronic total occlusion lesion of non-target vessel
* Symptomatic valvular heart disease or cardiomyopathy
* Too much overlapping or severe tortuosity to disrupt quantitative coronary analysis
* Previous bypass surgery

Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No