Comparing Wound Complication Following TMA With Aid of Electrospun Fiber Matrix

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-31

Study Completion Date

2024-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) patient populations commonly have poor healing outcomes and a large number of complications. There has been little study on the benefits of augmenting a TMA with a synthetic graft substitute. The long term goal is to push for an application of synthetic graft substitute to reduce infection rates and aid in the healing process. Augmenting a TMA with a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will demonstrate utilization of the product and other comparators in generating wound healing and infection rate outcomes including rate of infection, wound dehiscence and total healing response. Electrospun fiber matrices have long been investigated as an innovative construct for use in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research due to their ability to mimic the structure and scale of native tissue. Clinical studies have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating both chronic and acute wounds. There is strong evidence to support the application of a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will generate favorable wound healing and reduce infection rates.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Evaluation of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Dressing (PREVENA) to Prevent Lower Extremity Amputation Wound Complications

NCT03773575

Amputation Amputation; Postoperative, Sequelae Wound Dehiscence +3 more

COMPLETED NA

Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Total Ankle Arthroplasty

NCT03886818

Ankle Disease

COMPLETED NA

Comparative Performance of Dynamic Elastic Response Feet

NCT02542761

Transtibial Amputation - Unilateral

COMPLETED NA

TMT Fusion Plate vs. Two Crossed Screws

NCT02096146

Clinical Indication for First Metatarsal Joint Arthrodesis

TERMINATED NA

Stability and 3D Motion Study of an Experimental Prosthetic Foot

NCT00968292

Amputation

UNKNOWN PHASE3

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intervention or Exposure

* Transmetatarsal amputation with application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix
* After surgery, patient will be off-loaded to the surgical site with an off-loading device based on the investigator's decision, e.g., a boot for forefoot and a heel protector for hindfoot. Patients should be instructed on how to care for the surgical site, utilize an off-loading device, and keep the surgical site moist and clean.

Comparison intervention or Exposure

* Transmetatarsal amputation without application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix
* After surgery, patient will be off-loaded to the surgical site with an off-loading device based on the investigator's decision, e.g., a boot for forefoot and a heel protector for hindfoot. Patients will be instructed on how to care for the surgical site, utilize an off-loading device, and keep the surgical site moist and clean.

Outcomes

* Primary: Infection rate at 1 week postoperative follow-up visit
* Secondary: Wound dehiscence rate and wound healing status at 12 weeks post operatively. Infection rate at 2, 4, and 12 weeks post operatively.
* Patients will have follow-up visits at week 1, 2, 4, and 12. Assessment and imaging of the wound will occur at each visit. Assessment of adverse events, infection, and dehiscence will occur during each visit. Assessment of wound(s) through gross observation and analysis, wound progression, and tissue healing. Gross observation will be utilized to determine the necessity of standard dressing change. Carefully assess the wound(s) for signs of infection, dehiscence, and description of exudate present. Debridement and dressing changes may occur at each weekly visit or as needed. Debride the wound(s) as needed while not disrupting healing tissue. Photographic image will be obtain to document wound appearance. The clinician will inspect the wound bed for signs of infection and healing. Frequency of secondary dressing changes will be dependent upon the volume of exudate produced, type of dressing used and the clinician's decision upon inspection of the wound(s).
* Measurement and imaging of wound(s). If debridement is completed during this visit, then the assessment must be completed after debridement.

Timing of study

* Preop visit for eligibility and randomization
* Surgical visit: TMA with or without application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix
* 1, 2, 4, and 12 week post-op visits.

Setting of study

* Inpatient at Scripps Mercy Hospital
* Outpatient follow-up Scripps Mercy Podiatry Specialty Clinic or Dr. Brookshier's private clinic North Park Podiatry

Study exit: patient's participation in the study will end after any of the following

* Completion of 12 week follow-up period
* Pathology results from TMA surgery revealing active infection within remaining surgical margins
* Patient withdrawal
* The Investigator may withdraw the patient if he/she determines it is in the patient's best interest
* Patient lost to follow-up
* Amputation of the study limb
* Closure of study
* Patient death

Variables that can be collected: HbA1c, patients that require revascularization prior to TMA due to poor vascular status, age, gender, smoking status

Application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix (SEFM)

1. Wound Bed Preparation post TMA. Following amputation, prepare the wound bed using standard methods to ensure it is free of devitalized tissue. An initial excision or debridement of the wound is necessary to ensure the wound edges contain viable tissue. Cleanse the wound thoroughly with sterile saline prior to application of SEFM.
2. Preparation of SEFM. Select the appropriate size sheet of SEFM based on the size of the post-amputation defect. Heavily fenestrate with a scalpel or mesh prior to application. SEFM must be fenestrated prior to use in any wound prone to exudate in order to permit effective exudate management. SEFM is packaged in a nested pouch configuration. Peel open the outer foil pouch starting from the chevron sealed edge. The inner pouch is sterile and may be placed on the sterile field. Rinse surgical gloves, if necessary, to remove any glove powder prior to touching the product. SEFM can be cut to the desired shape in a wet or dry state. In order to increase pliability of the product, hydrate in warm, sterile, hypertonic solution (i.e., saline, water, etc.) for a minimum of 1 minute. The matrix should be cut down to fit the size of the wound and applied in full contact with the wound bed.
3. Application of SEFM. Place the SEFM within the surgical defect within the open space. Discard any unused pieces of study product. Management of wound exudate will determine the required dressing. The dressing will be securely in place and dressing determined by provider preference.

Adverse events will be documented. The following adverse events whether or not they are related to a study product/procedure:

* Infection of wound and/or area surrounding wound
* Complete or partial amputation of lower extremity
* Allergic reaction to a study product
* Excessive redness, pain, swelling or blistering of wound

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Amputation Wound; Foot Wound Complication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Group 1: transmetatarsal amputation without augmentation Group 2: transmetatarsal amputation augmentation with synthetic electrospun fiber matrix

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transmetatarsal amputation with primary closure

Transmetatarsal amputation with primary closure and no application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Transmetatarsal amputation with application of synthetic electrospun fiber matrix

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Synthetic electrospun fiber matrix

Intervention Type DEVICE

Electrospun fiber matrices have long been investigated as an innovative construct for use in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research due to their ability to mimic the structure and scale of native tissue. Clinical studies have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating both chronic and acute wounds. There is strong evidence to support the application of a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will generate favorable wound healing and reduce infection rates when used to augment transmetatarsal amputation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Synthetic electrospun fiber matrix

Electrospun fiber matrices have long been investigated as an innovative construct for use in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine research due to their ability to mimic the structure and scale of native tissue. Clinical studies have demonstrated clinical efficacy in treating both chronic and acute wounds. There is strong evidence to support the application of a synthetic electrospun fiber matrix will generate favorable wound healing and reduce infection rates when used to augment transmetatarsal amputation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Restrata

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergoing TMA
* At least 18 years old
* Adequate perfusion demonstrated by either TcPO2 or ankle-brachial index (ABI) or toe-brachia index (TBI) within 60 days prior to enrollment/randomization (Dorsum TcPO2 of study leg(s) ≥40mmHg OR ABI of study leg(s) with results of ≥ 0.7 and ≤ 1.3 OR TBI of study extremity(ies) with results of ≥ 0.5).
* Patient is willing and capable of complying with all protocol requirements.
* Patient or legally authorized representative (LAR) is willing to provide written informed consent prior to any study procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Previously enrolled into this study or is currently participating in another prospective drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint.
* Patient is pregnant, breast feeding or planning to become pregnant.
* Patient has a known allergy to resorbable suture materials.
* Patient has a life expectancy less than three months as assessed by the investigator.
* Patient has received skin substitutes during the run-in period or within 14 days prior to beginning of run-in period.
* Patient currently undergoing cancer treatment.
* Patient diagnosed with autoimmune connective tissue.
* Patient is taking parenteral corticosteroids or any cytotoxic agents for 7 consecutive days during the run-in period or up to 30 days before the run-in period.
* Chronic oral steroid use is not excluded if dose is \<10 mg per day for prednisone.
* Patient unwilling or unable to safely utilize appropriate offloading device to unweight wound(s).

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes