TMT Fusion Plate vs. Two Crossed Screws

NCT ID: NCT02096146

Last Updated: 2020-08-13

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: TERMINATED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 12 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2014-10-31
• Study Completion Date: 2016-08-31

Brief Summary

This study will compare TMT Fusion Plate versus two crossed screws for the fixation of first tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis. Patients who meet eligibility criteria will be randomly assigned to one of these two treatment options.

Detailed Description

Tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis is a common procedure which can be performed using various devices such as screws, plates or both. The Tarsometatarsal Fusion Plate from "DePuySynthes" is a new device designed to encourage bony fusion of the 1st TMT joint, and is expected to lead to earlier fusion compared to the current standard of care of using 2 crossed screws. This is expected, in turn, to result in an earlier reduction in pain and an earlier return to full activity. At this time there is insufficient data directly comparing outcome following surgery for patients treated with screws or plates, and a study protocol which produces a higher level of evidence is therefore necessary.

The main aim of this study is to compare patient-reported outcome following surgery for patients undergoing joint arthrodesis using the TMT Fusion plate versus screws only. It is expected that surgery will improve patient-reported outcome similarly for both treatment groups in the long-term, but that the improvement will occur earlier for the plate group. For this study patient-reported outcome will be assessed by the walking/standing and pain domain scores of the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ). An earlier improvement in any of these two domains would be considered to be valuable. The primary analysis will therefore compare the time to a minimal clinically relevant improvement for any of the two MOXFQ domains for patients treated with TMT fusion plate versus patients treated with only screws during the first 12 months following surgery.

An economic evaluation from a societal perspective will determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of the TMT fusion plate versus the 2 crossed screws technique for 1st TMT joint fusion. Therefore a randomized controlled trial will be conducted, where patient-reported outcomes as well as clinical outcome parameters will be assessed.

Conditions

Clinical Indication for First Metatarsal Joint Arthrodesis

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

TMT Fusion Plate

Patients are treated with TMT Fusion Plate to encourage bony fusion of the 1st TMT joint.

Group Type: OTHER

TMT Fusion plate

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Patients are treated with TMT Fusion Plate a post-market device to encourage bony fusion of the 1st TMT joint.

Two crossed screws

Patients are treated with two crossed screws.This procedure is a standard treatment for 1st TMT joint fusion .

Group Type: OTHER

Two crossed screws

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Patients are treated with two crossed screws.This procedure is a standard treatment for 1st TMT joint fusion.

Interventions

TMT Fusion plate

Patients are treated with TMT Fusion Plate a post-market device to encourage bony fusion of the 1st TMT joint.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Two crossed screws

Patients are treated with two crossed screws.This procedure is a standard treatment for 1st TMT joint fusion.

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Age: between 18 and 65 years
• At least one of the following:

• 1st TMT arthritis
• hallux valgus (intermetatarsal angle (IM) 1-2 angle > 15° on plain x-ray)
• 1st ray hypermobility with or without flat foot
• Painful condition
• Ability to understand the content of the patient information / Informed Consent Form
• Willingness and ability to participate in the clinical investigation according to the Clinical Investigation Plan (CIP)
• Signed and dated IRB/EC-approved written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

• Active infection
• Previous surgery on the 1st ray of the same foot
• Previous non-union on the 1st ray of the same foot
• Clinical obvious arthritis in other joints of the lower extremities
• Purely seeking plastic surgery
• Peripheral vascular disease (e.g. advanced diabetes)
• Peripheral sensory neuropathy (e.g. advanced diabetes)
• Concurrent surgery of the contralateral foot
• Any previously medically unmanaged severe systemic disease
• Substance abuse that would preclude reliable assessment
• Prisoner
• Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing Documentation

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Ian Winson, MB ChB, FRCS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Southmead Hospital

Locations

Mid Michigan Orthopedic Institute - East Lansing

East Lansing, Michigan, United States

Summit Orthopedics

Woodbury, Minnesota, United States

NY Downtown Orthopedic Associates

New York, New York, United States

Centro Médico Imbanaco Cali

Cali, , Colombia

Ian Winson

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Countries

United States; Colombia; United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

TMT Fusion Plate

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id