Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-01
2022-09-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Durapore vs. Hy-Tape to Secure The Endotracheal Tube
NCT03633877
Adding a Short Burst of Corticosteroid to the Conventional Treatment of H1 Antihistamines in Emergency Department.
NCT03296358
Detection of Aluminium-reactive T-lymphocytes in Patients With Vaccination Granulomas
NCT06130462
Contact Allergy to Rubber Accelerators - a Clinical Study
NCT06042309
Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Crab or Shrimp Allergy Reduction Study Using Nambudripad Allergy Elimination Techniques
NCT02208414
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Foam-tape/Control
One of the participants upper extremity (arm) was used for intervention and the same participants other arm was used as the control in this study.
There was only 1 research arm in this study and all study participants were in it.
2x2 inch piece of 3M microfoam adhesive
A 2x2 inch piece of 3M microfoam adhesive will be applied to the medial aspect of the subject's upper arm.
The adhesive will remain in place for 48 hours at which time an investigator will remove the adhesive and assess the study area. A numerical value will be assigned based on the Cutaneous Irritancy Scoring System (CISS). The study site will be compared to the contra-lateral upper extremity at the end of the 48 hour period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
2x2 inch piece of 3M microfoam adhesive
A 2x2 inch piece of 3M microfoam adhesive will be applied to the medial aspect of the subject's upper arm.
The adhesive will remain in place for 48 hours at which time an investigator will remove the adhesive and assess the study area. A numerical value will be assigned based on the Cutaneous Irritancy Scoring System (CISS). The study site will be compared to the contra-lateral upper extremity at the end of the 48 hour period.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No reported history of dermatologic conditions
* No active dermatologic lesions
* Able to provide written consent to participation in the study.
* Resident and/or ancillary staff
Exclusion Criteria
* Adults unable to consent.
* Prisoners
* Adults with anaphylaxis to medical adhesives
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
CHRISTUS Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHRISTUS Health/Texas A&M Health Science Center
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States
CHRISTUS Health
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Smith SM, Zirwas MJ. Nonallergic reactions to medical tapes. Dermatitis. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000098.
Widman TJ, Oostman H, Storrs FJ. Allergic contact dermatitis from medical adhesive bandages in patients who report having a reaction to medical bandages. Dermatitis. 2008 Jan-Feb;19(1):32-7.
Dykes PJ. The effect of adhesive dressing edges on cutaneous irritancy and skin barrier function. J Wound Care. 2007 Mar;16(3):97-100. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2007.16.3.27013.
Wood MD, Powers J, Rechter JL. Comparative Evaluation of Chest Tube Insertion Site Dressings: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Crit Care. 2019 Nov;28(6):415-423. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2019645.
Vo NH, Richman P, Torres R, Xu KT, Miller M. The incidence of dermatitis following application of foam tape in healthy volunteers-A prospective trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2024 May;79:212-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.043. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.