Foam Tape Allergy a Sticky Situation

NCT ID: NCT06059417

Last Updated: 2024-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-01

Study Completion Date

2022-09-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Foam tape is commonly used in the emergency department as a dressing over chest tubes owing to its occlusive and compressible properties. There is a paucity of data regarding the incidence of significant cutaneous reactions to this material. The investigators conducted a prospective trial to evaluate the incidence of dermatitis following application of foam tape to the upper arm of a cohort of healthy volunteers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a prospective, interventional trial. The investigators enrolled a cohort of consenting, healthy physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff at a teaching facility who did not have known hypersensitivity to foam tape. Study investigators applied a 2x2 inch piece of 3M micro-foam adhesive to the medial aspect of each subject's upper arm. The contralateral arm served as a reference for comparison. The adhesive remained in place for 48 hours and the study authors assessed patients utilizing the previously validated Cutaneous Irritancy Scoring System (CISS). Categorical variables analyzed by chi-square, continuous variables with t-tests.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Medical Adhesive Allergy Dermatologic Conditions Dermatologic Lesions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

A cohort of consenting, healthy physicians, nurses, and ancillary staff at a teaching facility who did not have known hypersensitivity to foam tape were enrolled. Study investigators applied a 2x2 inch piece of 3M micro-foam adhesive to the medial aspect of each subject's upper arm. The contralateral arm served as a reference for comparison. The adhesive remained in place for 48 hours and the study authors assessed patients utilizing the previously validated Cutaneous Irritancy Scoring System (CISS).
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Foam-tape/Control

One of the participants upper extremity (arm) was used for intervention and the same participants other arm was used as the control in this study.

There was only 1 research arm in this study and all study participants were in it.

Group Type OTHER

2x2 inch piece of 3M microfoam adhesive

Intervention Type OTHER

A 2x2 inch piece of 3M microfoam adhesive will be applied to the medial aspect of the subject's upper arm.

The adhesive will remain in place for 48 hours at which time an investigator will remove the adhesive and assess the study area. A numerical value will be assigned based on the Cutaneous Irritancy Scoring System (CISS). The study site will be compared to the contra-lateral upper extremity at the end of the 48 hour period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

2x2 inch piece of 3M microfoam adhesive

A 2x2 inch piece of 3M microfoam adhesive will be applied to the medial aspect of the subject's upper arm.

The adhesive will remain in place for 48 hours at which time an investigator will remove the adhesive and assess the study area. A numerical value will be assigned based on the Cutaneous Irritancy Scoring System (CISS). The study site will be compared to the contra-lateral upper extremity at the end of the 48 hour period.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 - 70
* No reported history of dermatologic conditions
* No active dermatologic lesions
* Able to provide written consent to participation in the study.
* Resident and/or ancillary staff

Exclusion Criteria

* Hospitalized patients
* Adults unable to consent.
* Prisoners
* Adults with anaphylaxis to medical adhesives
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CHRISTUS Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHRISTUS Health/Texas A&M Health Science Center

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

CHRISTUS Health

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Smith SM, Zirwas MJ. Nonallergic reactions to medical tapes. Dermatitis. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000098.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25581669 (View on PubMed)

Widman TJ, Oostman H, Storrs FJ. Allergic contact dermatitis from medical adhesive bandages in patients who report having a reaction to medical bandages. Dermatitis. 2008 Jan-Feb;19(1):32-7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18346394 (View on PubMed)

Dykes PJ. The effect of adhesive dressing edges on cutaneous irritancy and skin barrier function. J Wound Care. 2007 Mar;16(3):97-100. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2007.16.3.27013.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17385583 (View on PubMed)

Wood MD, Powers J, Rechter JL. Comparative Evaluation of Chest Tube Insertion Site Dressings: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Crit Care. 2019 Nov;28(6):415-423. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2019645.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31676515 (View on PubMed)

Vo NH, Richman P, Torres R, Xu KT, Miller M. The incidence of dermatitis following application of foam tape in healthy volunteers-A prospective trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2024 May;79:212-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.02.043. Epub 2024 Mar 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38462426 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Metal Panel Allergen Patch Test Study
NCT04500834 UNKNOWN PHASE3
Allergic Disease Onset Prevention Study
NCT05003804 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
HRIPT for Collagen Dressing
NCT06283173 COMPLETED NA
Quaternium-15, Use Test
NCT00311454 UNKNOWN PHASE4