Anatomical and Functional Outcome of PSG Vs BMG for Urethral Substitution in Long Segment Anterior Urethral Strictures
NCT ID: NCT06056856
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-01
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Penile Skin Versus Buccal Mucosal Graft in Augmentation Urethroplasty for Long Anterior Urethral Stricture
NCT07074717
Buccal Mucosal Graft for Onlay Ureteroplasty in the Management of Proximal Ureteral Stricture
NCT05928364
Snodgrass Versus Grafted Snodgrass Repair in Narrow Urethral Plate in Distal Penile Hypospadias
NCT06405763
Joshi's Step With Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty in Nearly Obliterated Bulbar Urethral Stricture
NCT07088198
Buccal Mucosal Graft for the Repair of Iatrogenic Pelviureteric Junction Obstruction or Ureteric Stricture.
NCT04503330
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Retrospective and very few were prospective randomized studies
* Some studies were done on lichen sclerosis cases that have an adverse effect on the PSG outcome.
* The follow-up duration was longer for PSG patients.
* Stricture length was usually longer for PSG cases.
This study aims to compare the PSG and BMG for substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach.
The investigators hypothesize that:
❶ Conducting a well-designed prospective, randomized study can help identify which technique is better than the other.
❷ Using the one-side dorsal approach can improve the outcomes of both techniques and identify their advantages and disadvantages.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PSG group
The group of patients who will undergo penile skin graft substitituion of long anterior urethral stricture
Penile skin graft substituttion urethroplasty
substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach
BMG group
The group of patients who will undergo buccal mucosal graft substitituion of long anterior urethral stricture
Buccal Mucosal Graft substitution urethroplasty
substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Penile skin graft substituttion urethroplasty
substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach
Buccal Mucosal Graft substitution urethroplasty
substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* A scarred and unsalvageable urethral plate or scarred perineum.
* Lichen sclerosis (Balanitis xerotica obliterans).
* Unhealthy/unavailable buccal mucosa.
5 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Al-Azhar University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Ahmed Anwar
Assistant lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmed Fahim, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Urology department, Al-Azhar university, Cairo, Egypt
Mostafa Ezzeldein, professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Urology department, Al-Azhar university, Cairo, Egypt
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Al-Azhar urology department, Al-Azhar university hospitals
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Samah Adel, secretary
Role: backup
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
773
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.