Frequency ,Etiology and Prognostic Factors of Acute Transverse Myelitis

NCT ID: NCT06055998

Last Updated: 2023-09-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-12-31

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To identify the frequency of ATM and its different aetiologies, alongside the different clinical and radiological patterns and prognostic factors .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute transverse myelitis (ATM) is an inflammatory condition of the spinal cord, covering the entire cross section and spreading on two or more vertebral segments, without evidence of a compressive lesion.1 This shows clinically as acute or subacute spinal cord dysfunction resulting in paresis, sensory level, and autonomic (bladder, bowel, and sexual) impairment below the level of the lesion.2 ATM is typically classified as either idiopathic ATM where no causative factor found or disease- associated transverse myelitis.3 Disease- associated transverse myelitis results from heterogenous pathophysiologic causes including infectious, parainfectious, paraneoplastic, drug/toxin-induced, systemic autoimmune disorders (SAIDs), Neurosarcoidosis and acquired demyelinating diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica (NMO).4 5 6 The annual incidence of ATM ranges from 1.34 to 4.60 cases per million,7 8 but increases to 24.6 cases per million if acquired demyelinating diseases like MS are included.9 TM can occur at any age, although a bimodal peak in incidence occurs in the second and fourth decades of life.7 8 10 This broad differential can overlap with noninflammatory myelopathies and can be very challenging for clinicians to navigate, causing delays in diagnosis or treatment.11 MRI is essential to rule out compressive causes of these neurologic manifestations, such as tumour, epidural abscess, herniated disc, stenosis of the medullary canal or hematoma. It is also used to show the extension of the lesion and for follow-up progress of these lesions after treatment.12 The lack of large-scale and longitudinal studies has hindered the understanding of this complex disorder.

Approximately 33% of patients recover with little to no lasting deficits, 33% have a moderate degree of permanent disability, and 33% are permanently disabled.13 The disease is often a monophasic illness and will only not recur unless it is secondary to a chronic comorbid condition, highlight the need for early and prompt recognition of aetiology. Steroids and immunosuppression are the only potential treatments for ATM at this time, but there is potential for monoclonal antibody drugs that might alter the disease course if an autoinflammatory process was identified. Although individuals affected by ATM show residual neurologic deficits if they have not recovered to normal within 3-6 months, no report has considered earlier factors that might determine the prognosis of the illness. The objective of this study was to determine frequency of ATM and its different etiologies, clinical and radiological patterns, and the different prognostic factors associated in a large tertiary center in the south of Egypt with a goal to improve awareness of ATM to ensure prompt recognition and treatment

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Transverse Myelitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CROSSOVER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MRI

MRI SPINE

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Diagnostic criteria include:

1. Sensory, motor, or autonomic dysfunction originating from the spinal cord
2. T2 hyperintense signal changes on MRI
3. No evidence of a compressive lesion
4. Bilateral signs/symptoms.
5. Clearly defined sensory level.
6. Evidence of inflammatory process demonstrated by gadolinium enhancement on MRI, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showing pleocytosis, or elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) index.
7. Progression to nadir between 4 hours and 21 days.

Exclusion Criteria

1. An alternative diagnosis became apparent any time along the study period including evidence of compressive lesion in MRI, history of previous radiation to the spine within the past 10 years, clinical deficit consistent with thrombosis of the anterior spinal artery or Abnormal flow voids on the surface of the spinal cord consistent with AVFs.
2. Incomplete clinical, laboratory or radiographic data.
3. Patients refused to sign the informed consent
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fouad E Fawaz

Resident Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ahmed H Youssef, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Supervisor

Doaa M Mahmoud, Lecturer

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Supervisor

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fouad E Fawaz, Resident

Role: CONTACT

+201030698686

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Harizi E, Shemsi K, Kola E, Hyseni F, Kola I, Siddique MA, Sadeque J, Decka A, Dervishi M, Nasir F, Capi L, Ayala I, Ghosh AS, Swarna SS, Musa J, Ahmetgjekaj I. Transverse myelitis in a 26-year-old male with tuberculosis. Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Aug 1;17(10):3669-3673. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.06.091. eCollection 2022 Oct.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35936885 (View on PubMed)

Murthy JM, Reddy JJ, Meena AK, Kaul S. Acute transverse myelitis: MR characteristics. Neurol India. 1999 Dec;47(4):290-3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10625901 (View on PubMed)

Beh SC, Greenberg BM, Frohman T, Frohman EM. Transverse myelitis. Neurol Clin. 2013 Feb;31(1):79-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2012.09.008.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23186897 (View on PubMed)

Christensen PB, Wermuth L, Hinge HH, Bomers K. Clinical course and long-term prognosis of acute transverse myelopathy. Acta Neurol Scand. 1990 May;81(5):431-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1990.tb00990.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 2375246 (View on PubMed)

Bhat A, Naguwa S, Cheema G, Gershwin ME. The epidemiology of transverse myelitis. Autoimmun Rev. 2010 Mar;9(5):A395-9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2009.12.007. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20035902 (View on PubMed)

Debette S, de Seze J, Pruvo JP, Zephir H, Pasquier F, Leys D, Vermersch P. Long-term outcome of acute and subacute myelopathies. J Neurol. 2009 Jun;256(6):980-8. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5058-x. Epub 2009 Feb 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19252779 (View on PubMed)

Berman M, Feldman S, Alter M, Zilber N, Kahana E. Acute transverse myelitis: incidence and etiologic considerations. Neurology. 1981 Aug;31(8):966-71. doi: 10.1212/wnl.31.8.966.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 7196523 (View on PubMed)

Wingerchuk DM. Postinfectious encephalomyelitis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2003 May;3(3):256-64. doi: 10.1007/s11910-003-0086-x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12691631 (View on PubMed)

Jacob A, Weinshenker BG. An approach to the diagnosis of acute transverse myelitis. Semin Neurol. 2008 Feb;28(1):105-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1019132.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18256991 (View on PubMed)

de Seze J, Stojkovic T, Breteau G, Lucas C, Michon-Pasturel U, Gauvrit JY, Hachulla E, Mounier-Vehier F, Pruvo JP, Leys D, Destee A, Hatron PY, Vermersch P. Acute myelopathies: Clinical, laboratory and outcome profiles in 79 cases. Brain. 2001 Aug;124(Pt 8):1509-21. doi: 10.1093/brain/124.8.1509.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11459743 (View on PubMed)

Frohman EM, Wingerchuk DM. Clinical practice. Transverse myelitis. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 5;363(6):564-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1001112. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20818891 (View on PubMed)

Dumic I, Vitorovic D, Spritzer S, Sviggum E, Patel J, Ramanan P. Acute transverse myelitis - A rare clinical manifestation of Lyme neuroborreliosis. IDCases. 2018 Dec 29;15:e00479. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2018.e00479. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30622896 (View on PubMed)

Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group. Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis. Neurology. 2002 Aug 27;59(4):499-505. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.4.499.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12236201 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

acute transverse myelitis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MRI Role in Knee Hemophilic Arthopathy
NCT07233122 NOT_YET_RECRUITING