Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-01
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A single-center, randomized, single-blind, prospective study was designed to compare nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients with ARDS after surgery. Sixty patients with ARDS after surgery to be admitted to ICU were randomly divided into experimental group (Nalbuphine group) and control group (Sufentanil group). This study aims to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride in patients with Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after surgery. The successful development of this study will provide more theoretical basis for the individualized analgesic sedation program for surgical patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative Pain and Discomfort After Orbital Decompression
NCT03562611
Effect of Butorphanol Combined With Flurbiprofen Axetil on Preventing Hyperalgesia Induced by Remifentanil in Patients
NCT02043366
Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Combined With Different Opioid Receptors for Gastrointestinal Surgery
NCT05576675
Analgesia Effects of Nalbuphine vs Sulfentanil
NCT02604797
Sufentanil in Patients With Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery Myocardial Damage Function Study
NCT06808841
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study aims to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride in patients with Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after surgery, and to explore the effects of nalbuphine hydrochloride on respiratory function, gastrointestinal function and cognitive function. To provide more theoretical basis for individualized analgesic and sedation program for surgical patients. Sixty patients were included and randomly divided into 1:1 groups, with 30 patients in each group. All patients were included according to strict inclusion criteria.
The experimental group was given nalbuphine analgesia and the control group was given sufentanil analgesia. The number of patients reaching the target level of analgesia and sedation at each time node, invasive mechanical ventilation time, oxygenation index change, mortality and other indicators were compared between the two groups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nalbuphine group
40 mg of nalbuphine was diluted into 50 mL solution, the load dose was 0.1mg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.04-0.08mg/kg/h, the CPOT score was \<2, and the daily maximum dose was 160mg.
Nalbuphine
Nalbuphine was injected intravenously. The target CPOT score was \<2, and the target RASS score was -2 \~ 1. 40 mg of nalbuphine was diluted into 50 mL solution, the load was 0.1mg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.04-0.08mg/kg/h, the CPOT score was \<2, and the maximum daily dose was 160mg.
Sufentanil group
0.1mg of sufentanil was diluted into 50 mL solution, the loading dose was 0.2-0.5μg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.2-0.3μg/kg/h, and the CPOT score was \<2 points.
Sufentanil
Sufentanil was injected intravenously, and the target CPOT score was \<2, and the target RASS score was -2 \~ 1. 0.1mg of sufentanil was diluted into 50 mL solution, the loading dose was 0.2-0.5μg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.2-0.3μg/kg/h, and the CPOT score was \<2 points
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nalbuphine
Nalbuphine was injected intravenously. The target CPOT score was \<2, and the target RASS score was -2 \~ 1. 40 mg of nalbuphine was diluted into 50 mL solution, the load was 0.1mg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.04-0.08mg/kg/h, the CPOT score was \<2, and the maximum daily dose was 160mg.
Sufentanil
Sufentanil was injected intravenously, and the target CPOT score was \<2, and the target RASS score was -2 \~ 1. 0.1mg of sufentanil was diluted into 50 mL solution, the loading dose was 0.2-0.5μg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.2-0.3μg/kg/h, and the CPOT score was \<2 points
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meet the diagnostic criteria for ARDS proposed at the 2011 Berlin ARDS Definition Conference;
* Age ≥18 years old, gender unlimited;
* Patients admitted to ICU with CPOT score ≥3;
* Stay in ICU ≥48h;
* Sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with esophageal reflux disease and severe gastrointestinal injury have AGI score ≥3;
* Long-term use of narcotic analgesics, hypnotics and psychotropic drugs;
* Alcohol withdrawal symptoms;
* Severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh grade C);
* Patients with bronchial asthma and myasthenia gravis;
* Patients with severe craniocerebral injury, brain tumor, and increased intracranial pressure are prone to respiratory depression;
* Patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass;
* Patients who have been enrolled in other clinical trials;
* Study patients with drug allergy or other contraindications;
* Pregnant or lactating women;
* The patient himself or his legally authorized representative is unwilling to sign the informed consent;
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hairong Chen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hairong Chen
Doctor of Medicine(M.D.)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hairong Chen, doctor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Qianfo Mountain Hospital, Shandong Province
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine
Jinan, Shandong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Quanzhen Wang, doctor
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zacny JP, Conley K, Galinkin J. Comparing the subjective, psychomotor and physiological effects of intravenous buprenorphine and morphine in healthy volunteers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Sep;282(3):1187-97.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
QFSYXLL-KY-2022(092)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.