Nalbuphine in ARDS Patients After Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06037330

Last Updated: 2024-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-01

Study Completion Date

2026-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Critically ill patients need reasonable and moderate analgesic and sedative treatment to eliminate or reduce pain, anxiety and restlessness, improve patient comfort and cooperation, reduce patients' stress response, protect organ function and optimize prognosis. As a semi-synthetic opioid receptor agonist-antagonist, nalbuphine can bind to μ, κand δ receptors, has partial antagonistic effect on μ receptor, and is fully activated on κreceptor, with very weak δ receptor activity. Results of a study on the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine for analgesia in ICU patients showed that nalbuphine has sustained and stable analgesic effect for patients with mild to moderate analgesic needs in ICU, the onset time is comparable to sufentanil, and excessive sedation caused by sufentanil can be avoided, and the effect on hemodynamics is small. It can be used as a new choice of analgesic drugs in ICU.

A single-center, randomized, single-blind, prospective study was designed to compare nalbuphine and sufentanil in patients with ARDS after surgery. Sixty patients with ARDS after surgery to be admitted to ICU were randomly divided into experimental group (Nalbuphine group) and control group (Sufentanil group). This study aims to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride in patients with Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after surgery. The successful development of this study will provide more theoretical basis for the individualized analgesic sedation program for surgical patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Severe patients need reasonable and moderate analgesic sedation to eliminate or reduce pain, anxiety and agitation, improve comfort and cooperation, reduce stress response, protect organ function and improve prognosis. As a semi-synthetic opioid receptor agonist-antagonist, nalbuphine can bind to μ, κand δ receptors, has partial antagonistic effect on μ receptor, and is fully activated on κreceptor, with very weak δ receptor activity. Nalbuphine exerts powerful analgesic and sedative effects at the spinal cord level, with rapid analgesic effect and long duration, almost no cardiovascular adverse reactions, mild respiratory depression and capping effect, low incidence of nausea, vomiting and skin pruritus, and low addiction. Results of a study on the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine for analgesia in ICU patients showed that nalbuphine has sustained and stable analgesic effect for patients with mild to moderate analgesic needs in ICU, the onset time is comparable to sufentanil, and excessive sedation caused by sufentanil can be avoided, and the effect on hemodynamics is small. It can be used as a new choice of analgesic drugs in ICU. Moreover, nalbuphine theoretically has no σ-receptor excitability, is not hallucinogenic, and the chance of inducing delirium is lower. Studies have shown that nalbuphine can reduce postoperative inflammation and oxidative stress and has a lung protective effect.

This study aims to determine the analgesic efficacy and safety of nalbuphine hydrochloride in patients with Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after surgery, and to explore the effects of nalbuphine hydrochloride on respiratory function, gastrointestinal function and cognitive function. To provide more theoretical basis for individualized analgesic and sedation program for surgical patients. Sixty patients were included and randomly divided into 1:1 groups, with 30 patients in each group. All patients were included according to strict inclusion criteria.

The experimental group was given nalbuphine analgesia and the control group was given sufentanil analgesia. The number of patients reaching the target level of analgesia and sedation at each time node, invasive mechanical ventilation time, oxygenation index change, mortality and other indicators were compared between the two groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nalbuphine group

40 mg of nalbuphine was diluted into 50 mL solution, the load dose was 0.1mg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.04-0.08mg/kg/h, the CPOT score was \<2, and the daily maximum dose was 160mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Nalbuphine

Intervention Type DRUG

Nalbuphine was injected intravenously. The target CPOT score was \<2, and the target RASS score was -2 \~ 1. 40 mg of nalbuphine was diluted into 50 mL solution, the load was 0.1mg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.04-0.08mg/kg/h, the CPOT score was \<2, and the maximum daily dose was 160mg.

Sufentanil group

0.1mg of sufentanil was diluted into 50 mL solution, the loading dose was 0.2-0.5μg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.2-0.3μg/kg/h, and the CPOT score was \<2 points.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

Sufentanil was injected intravenously, and the target CPOT score was \<2, and the target RASS score was -2 \~ 1. 0.1mg of sufentanil was diluted into 50 mL solution, the loading dose was 0.2-0.5μg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.2-0.3μg/kg/h, and the CPOT score was \<2 points

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nalbuphine

Nalbuphine was injected intravenously. The target CPOT score was \<2, and the target RASS score was -2 \~ 1. 40 mg of nalbuphine was diluted into 50 mL solution, the load was 0.1mg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.04-0.08mg/kg/h, the CPOT score was \<2, and the maximum daily dose was 160mg.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sufentanil

Sufentanil was injected intravenously, and the target CPOT score was \<2, and the target RASS score was -2 \~ 1. 0.1mg of sufentanil was diluted into 50 mL solution, the loading dose was 0.2-0.5μg/kg, the maintenance dose was 0.2-0.3μg/kg/h, and the CPOT score was \<2 points

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Nalbuphine Hydrochloride Injection Sufentanil citrate Injection

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Had undergone surgical treatment within 7 days before enrollment;
* Meet the diagnostic criteria for ARDS proposed at the 2011 Berlin ARDS Definition Conference;
* Age ≥18 years old, gender unlimited;
* Patients admitted to ICU with CPOT score ≥3;
* Stay in ICU ≥48h;
* Sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* APACHE II score ≥23 points;
* Patients with esophageal reflux disease and severe gastrointestinal injury have AGI score ≥3;
* Long-term use of narcotic analgesics, hypnotics and psychotropic drugs;
* Alcohol withdrawal symptoms;
* Severe liver dysfunction (Child-Pugh grade C);
* Patients with bronchial asthma and myasthenia gravis;
* Patients with severe craniocerebral injury, brain tumor, and increased intracranial pressure are prone to respiratory depression;
* Patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass;
* Patients who have been enrolled in other clinical trials;
* Study patients with drug allergy or other contraindications;
* Pregnant or lactating women;
* The patient himself or his legally authorized representative is unwilling to sign the informed consent;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hairong Chen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hairong Chen

Doctor of Medicine(M.D.)

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hairong Chen, doctor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Qianfo Mountain Hospital, Shandong Province

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine

Jinan, Shandong, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Quanzhen Wang, doctor

Role: CONTACT

15562570205

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Quanzhen Wang, doctor

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zacny JP, Conley K, Galinkin J. Comparing the subjective, psychomotor and physiological effects of intravenous buprenorphine and morphine in healthy volunteers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Sep;282(3):1187-97.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9316825 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

QFSYXLL-KY-2022(092)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oxycodone and Sufentanil for Analgesia in Hip Surgery
NCT03685188 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION PHASE4
Effect of Sufentanil on the Postoperative Pain
NCT06260046 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA