Elastographic and Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Patients With Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema

NCT ID: NCT06009666

Last Updated: 2023-08-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-01

Study Completion Date

2022-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of shear-wave elastography for the diagnosis and staging of breast cancer related lymphedema by assessing the skin and subcutaneous tissues of the arm and forearm, which could serve as a reference standard and be more easily applicable in daily life; and to investigate the relationship between the patients' symptoms and elastographic measurements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Both upper extremities of 72 patients with lymphedema and 72 healthy upper extremities were included in the study. The patients' demographic and clinical data were recorded. The thickness and echogenicity of the skin and subcutaneous tissues of all extremities were evaluated with B-mode ultrasonography, and the stiffness of the skin and subcutaneous tissues was evaluated with shear-wave elastography. The lymphedema arm and the healthy arm of the patients were compared both with each other and with the data of the control group. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability analysis was performed for ultrasonography and elastography measurements. The patients' pain, tension, weight, and stiffness symptoms associated with lymphedema were questioned using a numerical scale. The patients' functionality and participation in daily life activities were evaluated with the Quick DASH and Life Impact Index questionnaires. The relationship between these findings and elastographic and ultrasonographic parameters was analyzed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymphedema of Upper Arm Stiffness of Hand, Not Elsewhere Classified Evaluations, Diagnostic Self

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patient Group

Both Extremities of Patients With Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema

Shear Wave Elastography and B Mode Ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

We evaluated the both upper extremities of the patient and control group with elastography and B mode ultrasonography. Shear wave elastography evaluates tissue deformation caused by acoustic radiation force. A highly focused ultrasound radiation is produced; The propagation speed of the shear wave depends on the stiffness of the tissue. It is a simple, inexpensive, bedside, widely available, non-invasive technique. B mode USG can be used to assess skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness and echogenicity. Skin and subcutaneous thickness were measured with b mode ultrasound. Skin and subcutaneous tissue stiffness was measured by shear wave ultrasonography

Quick Dash Questionnare

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Quick-DASH is an assessment questionnaire that measures activity and participation limitations in all upper extremity disorders. In the questionnaire, the difficulties of the patients during their daily living activities are questioned with 11 questions. Each answer is scored from 1 to 5 on a Likert scale, from best to worst.

The Lymphedema Life Impact Scale

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Lymphedema Life Impact Scale is a questionnaire developed to evaluate the physical, functional and psychosocial effects of lymphedema. It consists of 18 questions; It includes 8 physical, 4 psychosocial and 6 functional subgroups. Each question is scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating increased seriousness.

Questioning lymphedema-related symptoms

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Arm pain and feeling of tension, heaviness and stiffness in the arm were evaluated separately by numerical scale. This scale is a 10 cm ruler that writes no pain, no tension, no heaviness, no stiffness on one side, and unbearable pain, tension and heaviness on the other side. Patients were asked to rate their associated symptoms on this scale between 0 and 10.

Extremity circumference and volume measurement

Intervention Type OTHER

For the diagnosis of lymphedema, a detailed physical examination and extremity circumference were measured. This measurement was taken from both wrists to arm height with 4 cm intervals. Those with a circumference difference greater than 2 cm and/or no 10% volume difference were considered preclinical (latent) and those with clinical lymphedema.

Control Group

Both Extremities of Healthy People With No History of Breast Cancer

Shear Wave Elastography and B Mode Ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

We evaluated the both upper extremities of the patient and control group with elastography and B mode ultrasonography. Shear wave elastography evaluates tissue deformation caused by acoustic radiation force. A highly focused ultrasound radiation is produced; The propagation speed of the shear wave depends on the stiffness of the tissue. It is a simple, inexpensive, bedside, widely available, non-invasive technique. B mode USG can be used to assess skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness and echogenicity. Skin and subcutaneous thickness were measured with b mode ultrasound. Skin and subcutaneous tissue stiffness was measured by shear wave ultrasonography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shear Wave Elastography and B Mode Ultrasonography

We evaluated the both upper extremities of the patient and control group with elastography and B mode ultrasonography. Shear wave elastography evaluates tissue deformation caused by acoustic radiation force. A highly focused ultrasound radiation is produced; The propagation speed of the shear wave depends on the stiffness of the tissue. It is a simple, inexpensive, bedside, widely available, non-invasive technique. B mode USG can be used to assess skin and subcutaneous tissue thickness and echogenicity. Skin and subcutaneous thickness were measured with b mode ultrasound. Skin and subcutaneous tissue stiffness was measured by shear wave ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Quick Dash Questionnare

Quick-DASH is an assessment questionnaire that measures activity and participation limitations in all upper extremity disorders. In the questionnaire, the difficulties of the patients during their daily living activities are questioned with 11 questions. Each answer is scored from 1 to 5 on a Likert scale, from best to worst.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The Lymphedema Life Impact Scale

The Lymphedema Life Impact Scale is a questionnaire developed to evaluate the physical, functional and psychosocial effects of lymphedema. It consists of 18 questions; It includes 8 physical, 4 psychosocial and 6 functional subgroups. Each question is scored from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating increased seriousness.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Questioning lymphedema-related symptoms

Arm pain and feeling of tension, heaviness and stiffness in the arm were evaluated separately by numerical scale. This scale is a 10 cm ruler that writes no pain, no tension, no heaviness, no stiffness on one side, and unbearable pain, tension and heaviness on the other side. Patients were asked to rate their associated symptoms on this scale between 0 and 10.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Extremity circumference and volume measurement

For the diagnosis of lymphedema, a detailed physical examination and extremity circumference were measured. This measurement was taken from both wrists to arm height with 4 cm intervals. Those with a circumference difference greater than 2 cm and/or no 10% volume difference were considered preclinical (latent) and those with clinical lymphedema.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For the patient group

* between the ages of 18-75
* diagnosed with breast cancer-associated lymphedema by lymphoscintigraphy
* being stage 0-1-2 lymphedema according to ISL staging For the control group
* between the ages of 18-75
* no history of breast cancer

Exclusion Criteria

* History of surgery in the assessment area
* History of trauma at the assessment site
* Active infection in the assessment area
* Presence of congenital or acquired malformations at the assessment site
* Primary lymphedema
* those with any medical condition that may cause edema, such as advanced heart or kidney failure
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Marmara University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

CANAN ŞANAL TOPRAK

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Marmara University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Canan Şanal-Toprak

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Marmara University School of Medicine, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

07.01.2022.145

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.