Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
334 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Investigators performed Randomized Controlled Trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of modified ERAS protocol for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) by introducing standardized pre- and post-operative treatment based on ERAS treatment guidelines (ERAS on PD, Research Institute Clinical Progress, 2014-0961; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02372331). As a result of the study, the ERAS protocol proved to be non-inferior to the existing pre- and post-operative treatment in terms of surgical complications, mortality, hospital stay, total hospital cost, and most nutritional indicators.
However, the previous study did not include a few important intraoperative items such as epidural analgesia and fluid balance among the main items of the ERAS protocol. This trial aims to evaluate the clinical results by applying the complete ERAS protocol.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of ERAS on Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT02372331
Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) After Liver Resection for Primary Liver Cancer
NCT02644603
ERAS Program Improves Recovery of HCC Patient Undergoing Hepatectomy
NCT03104920
Effect of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program on Outcomes After Pancreatoduodenectomy
NCT06935448
ERAS® Guidelines Validation of CRS With or Without HIPEC
NCT05185791
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will be conducted on adult patients who are planning to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of periampullary disease for 12 months after the start of the study.
Based on the results of the previous study which choose the functional recovery date as a primary outcome (control group; 9.0 ± 4.3 days, intervention group; 7.6 ± 4.3 days), a total of 334 patients (167 patients in each group) will be enrolled when calculated with power 0.8, α = 0.05, a two-tailed test, and a 10% withdrawal rate.
Investigators plan to randomize patients covered by the existing ERAS program to the control group and patients covered by the full ERAS protocol to the experimental group.
Investigators plan to observe the clinical outcomes up to 3 months after surgery.
The primary outcome is the functional recovery date, and secondary outcomes are the postoperative complication rate, postoperative mortality, and readmission rate.
All subjects who were randomized and received any study intervention were obliged to follow the study protocol and monitored for best compliance, per-protocol set or safety set was not defined differently.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional
Conventional ERAS program
No interventions assigned to this group
Experimental
complete ERAS program (Conventional ERAS program + Epidural analgesia + Fluid balance)
ERAS perioperative management
* Epidural analgesia
* Fluid balance
* Other items are the same as conventional
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ERAS perioperative management
* Epidural analgesia
* Fluid balance
* Other items are the same as conventional
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Performance: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2
* Resectable or borderline resectable malignant tumor or borderline malignant tumor on the periampullary area
* No distant metastases
* Bone marrow function: White Blood Cell (WBC) at least 3,000/mm3 or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3, Platelet count at least 125,000/mm3
* Liver function: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) / alanine aminotransferase (ALT) less than 3 times the upper limit of normal
* Renal function: Creatinine no greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
* Patients who consented and signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with active or uncontrolled infection
* Patients with severe psychiatric/neurological disorders
* People who are addicted to alcohol or other drugs
* Patients included in other clinical studies that may affect this study
* Patients unable to follow the researcher's instructions
* Pregnancy
* Patients with uncontrolled heart disease
* Patients with moderate or more comorbidities that are judged to have an impact on quality of life or nutritional status (liver cirrhosis, chronic renal failure, heart failure, etc.)
* Patients who underwent major abdominal organ surgery other than scheduled pancreaticoduodenectomy.
* Patients who require combined resection of other major abdominal organs in addition to scheduled pancreaticoduodenectomy
* History of allergy to local anesthetics
* Local infection at the treatment site
* Patients with neurological or mental health conditions
* A history of spinal surgery or compression fractures at abdominal level
* Patients with coagulopathy (Platelet \< 125,000/mm3 or International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≥ 1.5) or who continue to take anticoagulants or antithrombotic drugs without stopping
* Others who are not suitable for research in the judgment of the clinician
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Asan Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dae Wook Hwang
Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dae Wook Hwang, M.D., PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Asan Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hwang DW, Kim HJ, Lee JH, Song KB, Kim MH, Lee SK, Choi KT, Jun IG, Bang JY, Kim SC. Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program on pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019 Aug;26(8):360-369. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.641. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D, Grass F, Perinel J, Adham M, Wellge EB, Kunzler F, Besselink MG, Asbun H, Scott MJ, Dejong CHC, Vrochides D, Aloia T, Izbicki JR, Demartines N. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World J Surg. 2020 Jul;44(7):2056-2084. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w.
Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, Cox BP, Fearon KC, Feldman LS, Gan TJ, Kennedy RH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Miller T, Radtke FF, Ruiz Garces T, Schricker T, Scott MJ, Thacker JK, Ytrebo LM, Carli F. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Mar;60(3):289-334. doi: 10.1111/aas.12651. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
Kuemmerli C, Tschuor C, Kasai M, Alseidi AA, Balzano G, Bouwense S, Braga M, Coolsen M, Daniel SK, Dervenis C, Falconi M, Hwang DW, Kagedan DJ, Kim SC, Lavu H, Liang T, Nussbaum D, Partelli S, Passeri MJ, Pecorelli N, Pillai SA, Pillarisetty VG, Pucci MJ, Su W, Sutcliffe RP, Tingstedt B, van der Kolk M, Vrochides D, Wei A, Williamsson C, Yeo CJ, Zani S, Zouros E, Abu Hilal M. Impact of enhanced recovery protocols after pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 24;109(3):256-266. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab436.
Lee JH, Kim DH, Koh WU. Real-time ultrasound guided thoracic epidural catheterization: a technical review. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Oct;16(4):322-328. doi: 10.17085/apm.21060. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Kim HE, Kim YH, Song KB, Chung YS, Hwang S, Lee YJ, Park KM, Kim SC. Impact of critical pathway implementation on hospital stay and costs in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2014 Feb;18(1):14-20. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.1.14. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-1204
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.