The Effect of ERAS on Pancreaticoduodenectomy (v2.0)

NCT ID: NCT06009224

Last Updated: 2023-08-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

334 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is not a program that aims to reduce postoperative hospital stay, but the multimodal strategies that aim to attenuate the loss of, and improve the restoration of, functional capacity after surgery on evidence-based medicine. The benefits of ERAS are proven in many surgical procedures, such as upper gastrointestinal surgery and colorectal surgery.

Investigators performed Randomized Controlled Trials to evaluate the non-inferiority of modified ERAS protocol for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) by introducing standardized pre- and post-operative treatment based on ERAS treatment guidelines (ERAS on PD, Research Institute Clinical Progress, 2014-0961; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02372331). As a result of the study, the ERAS protocol proved to be non-inferior to the existing pre- and post-operative treatment in terms of surgical complications, mortality, hospital stay, total hospital cost, and most nutritional indicators.

However, the previous study did not include a few important intraoperative items such as epidural analgesia and fluid balance among the main items of the ERAS protocol. This trial aims to evaluate the clinical results by applying the complete ERAS protocol.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was a single-institution, randomized controlled clinical trial to test the superiority of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

This study will be conducted on adult patients who are planning to undergo pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of periampullary disease for 12 months after the start of the study.

Based on the results of the previous study which choose the functional recovery date as a primary outcome (control group; 9.0 ± 4.3 days, intervention group; 7.6 ± 4.3 days), a total of 334 patients (167 patients in each group) will be enrolled when calculated with power 0.8, α = 0.05, a two-tailed test, and a 10% withdrawal rate.

Investigators plan to randomize patients covered by the existing ERAS program to the control group and patients covered by the full ERAS protocol to the experimental group.

Investigators plan to observe the clinical outcomes up to 3 months after surgery.

The primary outcome is the functional recovery date, and secondary outcomes are the postoperative complication rate, postoperative mortality, and readmission rate.

All subjects who were randomized and received any study intervention were obliged to follow the study protocol and monitored for best compliance, per-protocol set or safety set was not defined differently.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periampullary Cancer Borderline Malignancy Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two study groups (Control (conventional) group and study (intervention) group) were randomly allocated and assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the whole duration of this study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The evaluation and judgment for morbidity (primary endpoint) / mortality (secondary endpoint) was made by Morbidity and Mortality Committee in our division. Committee members were blinded about knowledge of the interventions assigned to individual participants.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional

Conventional ERAS program

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Experimental

complete ERAS program (Conventional ERAS program + Epidural analgesia + Fluid balance)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ERAS perioperative management

Intervention Type OTHER

* Epidural analgesia
* Fluid balance
* Other items are the same as conventional

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ERAS perioperative management

* Epidural analgesia
* Fluid balance
* Other items are the same as conventional

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Fast tract

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 18 to 80 years old
* Performance: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2
* Resectable or borderline resectable malignant tumor or borderline malignant tumor on the periampullary area
* No distant metastases
* Bone marrow function: White Blood Cell (WBC) at least 3,000/mm3 or Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥ 1,500/mm3, Platelet count at least 125,000/mm3
* Liver function: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) / alanine aminotransferase (ALT) less than 3 times the upper limit of normal
* Renal function: Creatinine no greater than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
* Patients who consented and signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with distant metastases or patients with recurrent periampullary carcinoma
* Patients with active or uncontrolled infection
* Patients with severe psychiatric/neurological disorders
* People who are addicted to alcohol or other drugs
* Patients included in other clinical studies that may affect this study
* Patients unable to follow the researcher's instructions
* Pregnancy
* Patients with uncontrolled heart disease
* Patients with moderate or more comorbidities that are judged to have an impact on quality of life or nutritional status (liver cirrhosis, chronic renal failure, heart failure, etc.)
* Patients who underwent major abdominal organ surgery other than scheduled pancreaticoduodenectomy.
* Patients who require combined resection of other major abdominal organs in addition to scheduled pancreaticoduodenectomy
* History of allergy to local anesthetics
* Local infection at the treatment site
* Patients with neurological or mental health conditions
* A history of spinal surgery or compression fractures at abdominal level
* Patients with coagulopathy (Platelet \< 125,000/mm3 or International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≥ 1.5) or who continue to take anticoagulants or antithrombotic drugs without stopping
* Others who are not suitable for research in the judgment of the clinician
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Asan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dae Wook Hwang

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dae Wook Hwang, M.D., PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Asan Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Dae Wook Hwang, M.D., PhD

Role: CONTACT

82230103939

Min Kyu Sung, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

82230100541

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hwang DW, Kim HJ, Lee JH, Song KB, Kim MH, Lee SK, Choi KT, Jun IG, Bang JY, Kim SC. Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program on pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019 Aug;26(8):360-369. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.641. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31152686 (View on PubMed)

Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D, Grass F, Perinel J, Adham M, Wellge EB, Kunzler F, Besselink MG, Asbun H, Scott MJ, Dejong CHC, Vrochides D, Aloia T, Izbicki JR, Demartines N. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World J Surg. 2020 Jul;44(7):2056-2084. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32161987 (View on PubMed)

Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, Cox BP, Fearon KC, Feldman LS, Gan TJ, Kennedy RH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Miller T, Radtke FF, Ruiz Garces T, Schricker T, Scott MJ, Thacker JK, Ytrebo LM, Carli F. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Mar;60(3):289-334. doi: 10.1111/aas.12651. Epub 2015 Oct 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26514824 (View on PubMed)

Kuemmerli C, Tschuor C, Kasai M, Alseidi AA, Balzano G, Bouwense S, Braga M, Coolsen M, Daniel SK, Dervenis C, Falconi M, Hwang DW, Kagedan DJ, Kim SC, Lavu H, Liang T, Nussbaum D, Partelli S, Passeri MJ, Pecorelli N, Pillai SA, Pillarisetty VG, Pucci MJ, Su W, Sutcliffe RP, Tingstedt B, van der Kolk M, Vrochides D, Wei A, Williamsson C, Yeo CJ, Zani S, Zouros E, Abu Hilal M. Impact of enhanced recovery protocols after pancreatoduodenectomy: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 24;109(3):256-266. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab436.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 35037019 (View on PubMed)

Lee JH, Kim DH, Koh WU. Real-time ultrasound guided thoracic epidural catheterization: a technical review. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021 Oct;16(4):322-328. doi: 10.17085/apm.21060. Epub 2021 Oct 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34289297 (View on PubMed)

Kim HE, Kim YH, Song KB, Chung YS, Hwang S, Lee YJ, Park KM, Kim SC. Impact of critical pathway implementation on hospital stay and costs in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2014 Feb;18(1):14-20. doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.1.14. Epub 2014 Feb 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26155241 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-1204

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.