Optimising Microsurgical Reconstruction After Advanced Head and Neck Cancers
NCT ID: NCT04308525
Last Updated: 2020-03-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-06-01
2021-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Leg Function and ADL After ALT Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer
NCT02332161
Postoperatory Recovery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer, Fast-Track Protocol vs. Classical Management
NCT02172638
Effect of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program on Outcomes After Pancreatoduodenectomy
NCT06935448
COLONIC RESECTION FOR CANCER AS DIABETOGENIC RISK FACTOR
NCT04649567
Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery(ERAS) After Liver Resection for Primary Liver Cancer
NCT02644603
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Free flap reconstruction involves tissue taken from other parts of the body, that is transplanted along with the associated blood vessels to the reconstruction site. The vessels of the flap are usually anastomosed to the vessels of the neck (microvascular reconstruction) and the transplanted tissue thereby obtains a blood supply at its new location. Head and neck cancer patients are usually reconstructed using the free fibular flap, the latissimus dorsi flap, the radial forearm flap or the anterolateral thigh flap.
The combination of complicated surgery and often malnourished patients with a low body mass index (BMI), that typically suffer from tobacco and alcohol abuse, commonly lead to postoperative ICU treatment and complications. The most common are infections, re-operations, delayed wound healing and refeeding syndrome, which is reported in up to 35% of patients undergoing major surgery for head and neck cancer.
Even with successful reconstruction, many patients suffer from drooling, lack of adequate clenching, permanent gastric tube feeding, insufficient wound healing and a high recurrence rate. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a peri- and postoperative care concept designed to accelerate recovery and improve convalescence. It has previously been established as superior to conventional care for a wide variety of procedures. As one of the first departments in the world our department has successfully implemented an ERAS program for microsurgical patients that undergo breast reconstruction using autologous tissue. By utilizing our experience with ERAS and combining it with a review of our own patient data we have developed an ERAS protocol for microvascular reconstruction after ablative surgery for head and neck cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ERAS Group
Prospectively included patients after introduction of an ERAS programme
Early ambulation
Early ambulation will help prevent postoperative infections, especially pneumonia and urinary tract infections. Additionally it will prevent constipation by promotion of bowel-movement and function and prevent thromboembolic complications. Patients undergoing surgery with a free fibula flap are currently unable to ambulate for 6 to 7 days while a split-thickness skin-graft is healing. We will apply a pressure dressing to the wound which makes ambulation possible immediately after surgery (or after return from the ICU). Likewise, all other patient groups will be encouraged to fully ambulate on POD (post-operative day) 1 or POD 2.
Early oral feeding
To monitor the patients' nutritional status, blood samples will be taken to identify risk of refeeding syndrome and patients will be evaluated according to the current guidelines from the ENT (ear-, nose-, throat-) department. We wil use the ESPEN guidelines for nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), which have been validated for head and neck cancer patients to perform a risk assessment for malnutrition. A consultation with a clinical dietician will be arranged in order to calculate the required daily nutritional intake. Patients in risk of refeeding syndrome will be closely monitored in the outpatient clinic during the time from the MDT(Multi Disciplinary Team) conference to the day of surgery. Patients in need of additional nutritional support will be provided with supplementary energy/protein drinks. Some patients may need closer monitoring, guidance regarding extra meals and to have a nasogastric tube placed to get used to the tube and optimize pre-operative nutritional status.
Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia
On-label use of already approved drugs including perioperative dexamethasone, administered with the aim of reducing opioid intake.
Pre-operatively the patients are given 400 mg of Celebra. During surgery 24 mg of dexamethasone is administered. The post-operative regimen consists of 12 mg of Dexamethasone 48 and 96 hours post-operatively, 200 mg of Celebra morning and evening (maximum 14 days) and 1g of paracetamol times four times daily. Morphine will only be administered when assessed necessary with a dose of 10 mg p.n. maximum six times a day.
Goal-directed fluid therapy
Focus on avoidance of over-hydration. Aim for fluid-load after surgery: max: +1000-1500 ml
CAD/CAM system for reconstructive plates
Computer-assisted design and modelling (CAD/CAM) are a system for pre-operative planning and construction of reconstructive plates used for mandibular reconstruction. This will help reduce the operating-time, as the maxillofacial surgeon will bring a pre-bent reconstructive plate to the procedure instead of manually forming it during surgery. Already implemented for several procedures in the department.
Functional discharge criteria
Introduction of a number of functional discharge criteria to avoid prolonged postoperative hospitalisation
Control group
We retrospectively evaluated our procedures for the period 2014-2016
Standard/historical postoperative regimen
Non-formalised historical peri- and postoperative regimen.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Early ambulation
Early ambulation will help prevent postoperative infections, especially pneumonia and urinary tract infections. Additionally it will prevent constipation by promotion of bowel-movement and function and prevent thromboembolic complications. Patients undergoing surgery with a free fibula flap are currently unable to ambulate for 6 to 7 days while a split-thickness skin-graft is healing. We will apply a pressure dressing to the wound which makes ambulation possible immediately after surgery (or after return from the ICU). Likewise, all other patient groups will be encouraged to fully ambulate on POD (post-operative day) 1 or POD 2.
Early oral feeding
To monitor the patients' nutritional status, blood samples will be taken to identify risk of refeeding syndrome and patients will be evaluated according to the current guidelines from the ENT (ear-, nose-, throat-) department. We wil use the ESPEN guidelines for nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002), which have been validated for head and neck cancer patients to perform a risk assessment for malnutrition. A consultation with a clinical dietician will be arranged in order to calculate the required daily nutritional intake. Patients in risk of refeeding syndrome will be closely monitored in the outpatient clinic during the time from the MDT(Multi Disciplinary Team) conference to the day of surgery. Patients in need of additional nutritional support will be provided with supplementary energy/protein drinks. Some patients may need closer monitoring, guidance regarding extra meals and to have a nasogastric tube placed to get used to the tube and optimize pre-operative nutritional status.
Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia
On-label use of already approved drugs including perioperative dexamethasone, administered with the aim of reducing opioid intake.
Pre-operatively the patients are given 400 mg of Celebra. During surgery 24 mg of dexamethasone is administered. The post-operative regimen consists of 12 mg of Dexamethasone 48 and 96 hours post-operatively, 200 mg of Celebra morning and evening (maximum 14 days) and 1g of paracetamol times four times daily. Morphine will only be administered when assessed necessary with a dose of 10 mg p.n. maximum six times a day.
Goal-directed fluid therapy
Focus on avoidance of over-hydration. Aim for fluid-load after surgery: max: +1000-1500 ml
CAD/CAM system for reconstructive plates
Computer-assisted design and modelling (CAD/CAM) are a system for pre-operative planning and construction of reconstructive plates used for mandibular reconstruction. This will help reduce the operating-time, as the maxillofacial surgeon will bring a pre-bent reconstructive plate to the procedure instead of manually forming it during surgery. Already implemented for several procedures in the department.
Functional discharge criteria
Introduction of a number of functional discharge criteria to avoid prolonged postoperative hospitalisation
Standard/historical postoperative regimen
Non-formalised historical peri- and postoperative regimen.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients pre-operatively admitted to the ICU
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jens Hjermind Højvig
M.D., Ph.D.-student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jens H Hojvig, Md
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, København Ø, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hanasono MM, Friel MT, Klem C, Hsu PW, Robb GL, Weber RS, Roberts DB, Chang DW. Impact of reconstructive microsurgery in patients with advanced oral cavity cancers. Head Neck. 2009 Oct;31(10):1289-96. doi: 10.1002/hed.21100.
Montero PH, Patel SG. Cancer of the oral cavity. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015 Jul;24(3):491-508. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
Bak M, Jacobson AS, Buchbinder D, Urken ML. Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol. 2010 Feb;46(2):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Noordhoff MS. Fibular osteoseptocutaneous flap: anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Aug;78(2):191-200. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198608000-00008.
Omura K. Current status of oral cancer treatment strategies: surgical treatments for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;19(3):423-30. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0689-z. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
Rasmussen SO, Kristensen MB, Wessel I, Andersen JR. Incidence and Risk Factors of Refeeding Syndrome in Head and Neck Cancer Patients-An Observational Study. Nutr Cancer. 2016 Nov-Dec;68(8):1320-1329. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1225103. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
Bonde CT, Khorasani H, Elberg J, Kehlet H. Perioperative Optimization of Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb;137(2):411-414. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000475749.40838.85.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ERAS Free FLAP for H&N Cancer
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.