Contribution of Nasal High Flow in Pneumology Assessed in Acid-Free Hypercapnic Acute Respiratory Failure

NCT ID: NCT06008587

Last Updated: 2025-11-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-27

Study Completion Date

2025-09-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The hypothesis is that Nasal High Flow therapy for patients with Hypercapnic Acute Respiratory Failure without acidosis, in addition to standard treatment would improve the care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the PIRAHNA study is to compare patients treated with Nasal High Flow in association with conventional standard treatment versus patients treated only with conventional standard treatment.

Primary objective : To demonstrate the therapeutic superiority of Nasal High Flow in hypercapnic Acute Respiratory Failure without acidosis, in combination with conventional standard treatment

Secondary objectives :

1. Identify the characteristics (etiologies) of responder patients (defined by a decrease in capnia and a failure to develop acidosis within two weeks of hospitalization)
2. Identify the etiology (trigger) of the Acute Respiratory Failure of responder patients
3. Compare the evolution of respiratory rate between the two treatment groups
4. Compare the evolution of dyspnea between the two treatment groups
5. Compare the evolution of gas exchanges between the two treatment groups
6. Compare the length of stay between the two groups
7. Compare the evolution of patients comfort state in the two treatment groups

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Insufficiency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nasal High Flow therapy in association with the standard therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AIRVO3 TM

Intervention Type DEVICE

A device that provides high flows of heated and humidified respiratory gases to patient who breath spontaneously. Patients will be treated with the device up to 15 days or until the occurrence of respiratory acidosis defined by pH\<7.35, whichever come first.

Standard therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard therapy depends on the acute respiratory failure etiology. Treatments will be administered at the investigator's discretion in accordance with the standard of care.

Standard therapy alone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard therapy depends on the acute respiratory failure etiology. Treatments will be administered at the investigator's discretion in accordance with the standard of care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AIRVO3 TM

A device that provides high flows of heated and humidified respiratory gases to patient who breath spontaneously. Patients will be treated with the device up to 15 days or until the occurrence of respiratory acidosis defined by pH\<7.35, whichever come first.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard therapy

Standard therapy depends on the acute respiratory failure etiology. Treatments will be administered at the investigator's discretion in accordance with the standard of care.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Major patient ≥ 18 years old
* Medical diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure less than 48 hours
* With partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) \> 45 and pH \> 7.35 for less than 48 hours, with no indication of Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) placement
* Underlying terrain of known or unknown chronic respiratory pathology (may be unknown at time of diagnosis) Examples : COPD, Bronchiectasis, Pulmonary fibrosis, asthma, sequelae pathologies …
* All etiologies (infectious, cardiac decompensation, trauma, etc.)
* Having given informed consent
* Patient under a social security scheme
* Possibility to include a patient having already been included in the study but suffering from a new episode of hypercapnic non acidic Acute Respiratory Failure with a free interval of 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Restrictive chronic neuromuscular or kyphoscoliotic respiratory insufficiencies
* Drug-induced Acute respiratory failure
* Pneumothorax (X-ray pulmonary detachment)
* Oxygen poisoning. In this case, PaCO2 will be asset again later with the purpose to include after oxygenotherapy decrease for a target SpO2 of 92% maximum
* Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus 2 (COVII) Pneumonia
* Tracheostomy
* Prior treatment with chronic or initiated NIV just prior to treatment (e.g. Intensive Care Unit)
* Respiratory Severity Criteria for Resuscitation Management
* Agitation or non-cooperation
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Person participating in other biomedical research
* Any other reason that the investigator believes may interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives
* Person under judicial protection (guardianship, curatorship)
* Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Cécile MAINCENT, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de Cannes

Cannes, Alpes Maritime, France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon- La Seyne sur Mer - Hôpital Sainte Musse

Toulon, Var, France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace

Monaco, , Monaco

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Monaco

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-A02641-42

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2022-CHITS-012

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.