Contribution of Nasal High Flow in Pneumology Assessed in Acid-Free Hypercapnic Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT ID: NCT06008587
Last Updated: 2025-11-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-27
2025-09-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conduct of Nasal High Flow Oxygen in Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT03311087
Use of Nasal High Flow Oxygen During Breaks of Non-invasive Ventilation for Patients With Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT03406572
Efficacy and Safety of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Associated Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT06582459
Standard Oxygen Versus High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
NCT04468126
Out-of-Hospital Non-Invasive Ventilation for Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure
NCT00885898
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary objective : To demonstrate the therapeutic superiority of Nasal High Flow in hypercapnic Acute Respiratory Failure without acidosis, in combination with conventional standard treatment
Secondary objectives :
1. Identify the characteristics (etiologies) of responder patients (defined by a decrease in capnia and a failure to develop acidosis within two weeks of hospitalization)
2. Identify the etiology (trigger) of the Acute Respiratory Failure of responder patients
3. Compare the evolution of respiratory rate between the two treatment groups
4. Compare the evolution of dyspnea between the two treatment groups
5. Compare the evolution of gas exchanges between the two treatment groups
6. Compare the length of stay between the two groups
7. Compare the evolution of patients comfort state in the two treatment groups
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nasal High Flow therapy in association with the standard therapy
AIRVO3 TM
A device that provides high flows of heated and humidified respiratory gases to patient who breath spontaneously. Patients will be treated with the device up to 15 days or until the occurrence of respiratory acidosis defined by pH\<7.35, whichever come first.
Standard therapy
Standard therapy depends on the acute respiratory failure etiology. Treatments will be administered at the investigator's discretion in accordance with the standard of care.
Standard therapy alone
Standard therapy
Standard therapy depends on the acute respiratory failure etiology. Treatments will be administered at the investigator's discretion in accordance with the standard of care.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AIRVO3 TM
A device that provides high flows of heated and humidified respiratory gases to patient who breath spontaneously. Patients will be treated with the device up to 15 days or until the occurrence of respiratory acidosis defined by pH\<7.35, whichever come first.
Standard therapy
Standard therapy depends on the acute respiratory failure etiology. Treatments will be administered at the investigator's discretion in accordance with the standard of care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Medical diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure less than 48 hours
* With partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) \> 45 and pH \> 7.35 for less than 48 hours, with no indication of Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) placement
* Underlying terrain of known or unknown chronic respiratory pathology (may be unknown at time of diagnosis) Examples : COPD, Bronchiectasis, Pulmonary fibrosis, asthma, sequelae pathologies …
* All etiologies (infectious, cardiac decompensation, trauma, etc.)
* Having given informed consent
* Patient under a social security scheme
* Possibility to include a patient having already been included in the study but suffering from a new episode of hypercapnic non acidic Acute Respiratory Failure with a free interval of 3 months
Exclusion Criteria
* Drug-induced Acute respiratory failure
* Pneumothorax (X-ray pulmonary detachment)
* Oxygen poisoning. In this case, PaCO2 will be asset again later with the purpose to include after oxygenotherapy decrease for a target SpO2 of 92% maximum
* Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus 2 (COVII) Pneumonia
* Tracheostomy
* Prior treatment with chronic or initiated NIV just prior to treatment (e.g. Intensive Care Unit)
* Respiratory Severity Criteria for Resuscitation Management
* Agitation or non-cooperation
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Person participating in other biomedical research
* Any other reason that the investigator believes may interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives
* Person under judicial protection (guardianship, curatorship)
* Person deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cécile MAINCENT, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier de Cannes
Cannes, Alpes Maritime, France
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon- La Seyne sur Mer - Hôpital Sainte Musse
Toulon, Var, France
Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace
Monaco, , Monaco
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-A02641-42
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2022-CHITS-012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.