Investigation of the Efficacy of Treatments With Backup Device in Spine Pathologies

NCT ID: NCT06006377

Last Updated: 2025-05-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our aim in this study is to examine the effectiveness of the Backup spine health device in spinal problems and compare it with traditional physical therapy methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators study was planned as a randomized controlled study. Participants will be divided into 2 groups as conventional physiotherapy and Backup group by simple randomized method. Participants will be taken to a treatment program for 12 weeks, 3 days a week. Parameters such as pain, posture, sleep quality, quality of life, muscle shortening at the beginning and end of the study. The results will be analyzed statistically.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spine Disease Back Pain Disc Herniation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

conventional physiotherapy and backup device therapy
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

electrotherapy

conventional physiotherapy methods (hotpack, Ultrasound , Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

electrotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

hotpack electrotherapy ultrasound exercises

backup

conventional physiotherapy and backup device therapy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Backup therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

The backup spine health device is in the form of a mat and provides segmental electrical stimulation to the spines. At the same time, the mat can heat up to 40 degrees during the treatment process. Backup spine health device is very effective in both reducing pain and strengthening the muscles with electrical stimulations by reaching even the deep muscles around the spine. Sessions consist of 30 minutes

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

electrotherapy

hotpack electrotherapy ultrasound exercises

Intervention Type OTHER

Backup therapy

The backup spine health device is in the form of a mat and provides segmental electrical stimulation to the spines. At the same time, the mat can heat up to 40 degrees during the treatment process. Backup spine health device is very effective in both reducing pain and strengthening the muscles with electrical stimulations by reaching even the deep muscles around the spine. Sessions consist of 30 minutes

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being between the ages of 20-60
* sick individuals with spinal problems
* Persons who have filled out the consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* People with spinal pathology for whom physiotherapy is contraindicated
* Having a neurological problem
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Uskudar University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Ömer Şevgin

Asst. Prof. Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Asiye ÖNELGE

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Uskudar University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uskudar University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C. Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ. 2016 Jan 4;352:h6234. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6234.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26727925 (View on PubMed)

Stoll T, Germann D, Hagmann H. [Physiotherapy in lumbar disc herniation ]. Ther Umsch. 2001 Aug;58(8):487-92. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.58.8.487. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11552355 (View on PubMed)

Andersen MO, Andresen AK, Lorenzen MD, Isenberg-Jorgensen A, Stottrup C. [Non-surgical treatment of lumbar radiculopathy]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2017 Nov 13;179(23):V05170397. Danish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29139353 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Uskudar56

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Artificial Intelligence Clinical Decision
NCT07342790 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA