The Effect of Robot Assisted Hand Therapy in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury

NCT ID: NCT05726773

Last Updated: 2023-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-12-15

Study Completion Date

2023-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Considering the scarcity of studies on robotic hand therapy, it has been seen that larger-scale and long-term follow-up studies are needed. In this study, our aim is to compare the effects of robot-assisted hand therapy and conventional physiotherapy on hand functions and quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is considered one of the most devastating injuries that cause lifelong disability.Among the impaired functions, upper extremity function is one of the most important goals of rehabilitation for these individuals.Hand functions are among the most important determinants of independence.Some studies have reported that in more than half of people with tetraplegia, restoring arm and hand function will improve quality of life.Therefore, small improvements in upper extremity function can make a clinically significant difference in feeding, bathing, transferring and other functional activities.Given that the majority of individuals with spinal cord injuries are in their most productive years and life expectancy approaches that of the healthy population, more aggressive treatment strategies that focus on improving peripheral muscle control and recovery of the central nervous system (CNS) are needed.Recently, treatment based on the 'motor learning theory' has been reported to be effective in the recovery of impaired upper extremity function.It has been shown that by repetitive movements as intense as possible to help achieve the ultimate goal of optimum movement, patients are able to learn motor skills that lead to CNS recovery.It has also been suggested that repetitive and activity-based exercise may facilitate recovery after spinal cord injury by inducing practice-dependent brain and spinal cord plasticity.Therefore, repetitive, intensive, and activity-based upper extremity rehabilitative therapy can help improve impaired upper extremity function.In this context, robotic therapy (RT) may be an alternative way of delivering rehabilitative therapy to patients with tetraplegia, as RT can deliver consistently high-intensity, high-repetition, and task-specific training with less effort compared to conventional therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tetraplegia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robot Assisted Therapy Group

In the RAT group, it was planned to perform robotic rehabilitation with a hand-finger robot \[Amadeo (Tyromotion, Graz, Austria)\] for 30 minutes for both upper extremities, accompanied by a physiotherapist who is trained in robotic rehabilitation and has at least 5 years of experience. In robotic rehabilitation, continuous passive range of motion (CPM), active assistive exercises and assistive continuous passive range of motion (CPM Plus) programs will be used.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Robot Assisted Therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In robotic rehabilitation, continuous passive range of motion (CPM), active assistive exercises and assistive continuous passive range of motion (CPM Plus) programs will be used.

Conventional Therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the Conventional Therapy group, an exercise program consisting of passive and active assistive range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises and task-oriented exercises for 30 minutes for both hands was planned, accompanied by a physiotherapist experienced in spinal cord injury rehabilitation for at least 5 years.

Conventional Therapy Group

In the Conventional Therapy group, an exercise program consisting of passive and active assistive range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises and task-oriented exercises for 30 minutes for both hands was planned, accompanied by a physiotherapist experienced in spinal cord injury rehabilitation for at least 5 years.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the Conventional Therapy group, an exercise program consisting of passive and active assistive range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises and task-oriented exercises for 30 minutes for both hands was planned, accompanied by a physiotherapist experienced in spinal cord injury rehabilitation for at least 5 years.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Robot Assisted Therapy

In robotic rehabilitation, continuous passive range of motion (CPM), active assistive exercises and assistive continuous passive range of motion (CPM Plus) programs will be used.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Therapy

In the Conventional Therapy group, an exercise program consisting of passive and active assistive range of motion exercises, strengthening exercises and task-oriented exercises for 30 minutes for both hands was planned, accompanied by a physiotherapist experienced in spinal cord injury rehabilitation for at least 5 years.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mini mental test score \>15
* Able to understand the commands
* Had a function between 1 and 4 in at least one of the key muscle strengths in at least one hand.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with persistent pain in the upper extremity (VAS\>40)
* Patients with severe spasticity in the hand (MAS≥3)
* Patients with severe limitation of joint range of motion / contracture in the hand
* Patients who had fractures or operations in the upper extremity in the last 6 months
* Patients who received botulinum toxin injection to the upper extremity in the last 6 months
* Patients with skin ulcers
* Patients with severe visual impairment and severe depression
* Patients who cannot sit in a chair for more than 30 minutes
* Patients with a history of stroke or progressive neurodegenerative disease
* Patients with neuromuscular disease
* Patients with uncontrolled epilepsy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sevda Adar

assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

SEVDA ADAR

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sevda Adar

Afyonkarahisar, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SATETRA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.