Robotic-assisted Upper Extremity Training in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
NCT ID: NCT03239301
Last Updated: 2017-08-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-01
2017-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Baseline data and post-intervention data was compared.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of an Exoskeleten With an End-effector for Assisted Gait Training in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03544398
Comparison of the Effects of Robotic Rehabilitation, Functional Electrical Stimulation and Occupational Therapy on Upper Extremity and Hand Functions in Tetraplegic Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06912217
Robotic Rehabilitation in Patients With Acute Stroke
NCT03571529
The Effect of Robot Assisted Hand Therapy in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05726773
Upper Extremity Pathologies in Spinal Cord Injuries
NCT06278740
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional Rehabilitation
Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated. Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.
Conventional Rehabilitation
Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated. Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.
Robotic Rehabilitation + Conventional Rehab
The Armeo Spring HocomAG Inc. (Volketswil, Switzerland) device was used in robot assisted upper limb rehabilitation program. A
Conventional Rehabilitation
Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated. Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.
Robotic REhabilitation
The Armeo Spring HocomAG Inc. (Volketswil, Switzerland) device was used in robot assisted upper limb rehabilitation program. Assistive component of the robotic arm was adjusted in accordance with motor level of each patient. Variety and difficulty of games were chosen according to the ability and functional status of the patients. Variety and difficulty level of the games were modified according to progress of patients by the same physiotherapist.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional Rehabilitation
Conventional rehabilitation program consisted range of motion (ROM) exercises, balance and coordination training, progressive resistive exercises, posture training, gait training, and occupational therapy as much as the patients tolerated. Conventional rehabilitation was tailored to the patient considering his requires and expectancies.
Robotic REhabilitation
The Armeo Spring HocomAG Inc. (Volketswil, Switzerland) device was used in robot assisted upper limb rehabilitation program. Assistive component of the robotic arm was adjusted in accordance with motor level of each patient. Variety and difficulty of games were chosen according to the ability and functional status of the patients. Variety and difficulty level of the games were modified according to progress of patients by the same physiotherapist.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cervical Level of Spinal Cord Injury
Exclusion Criteria
* Intensive spasticity (Ashworth 3-4)
* Shoulder pain that causes exercise intolerance
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Timur Ekiz
Medical Doctor, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Specialist
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ankara Fizik Tedavi ve REhabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Ankara Physical MEdicine and REhabilitation Trainign and Research Hospital
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1240
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.