Comparison Effects of Two Different Balance Systems on the Balance, Posture and Functionality in Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT05173389
Last Updated: 2023-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-04-01
2023-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Second group chronic stroke patients: Bobath Method 30 minutes, 10 minutes bicycle exercises Nmes- (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) will be applied hemiparetic limb 10 minutes and Thera-Trainer balance training 15 minutes in the same session.
Study Aim: İnvestigate and compare the effects of "Techno Body" and "Balance Trainer" on the balance, posture and functionality in patients with chronic stroke in order to bring a new perspective conventional physiotherapy and rehabilitation studies. Study will be an important study in terms of the literature ,effects two technology-supported balance systems will be revealed and compared in stroke patients order to improve balance, posture and functionality.
Study Hypothesis:
1. \- Effects of two different balance systems on balance, posture and functionality are compared in stroke patients; No difference between balance training with TechnoBody device and balance training with Theratrainer device.
2. \- Effects of two different balance systems on balance, posture and functionality compared in stroke patients; Difference between balance training with TechnoBody device and balance training with Theratrainer device.
Conclusion: Effects of two technology-supported balance systems will be improve balance, posture and functionality in stroke patients and balance sistems advantages will be compared.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Abdominal Electrical Stimulation for Balance and Muscle Thickness in Stroke Patients
NCT07143630
The Effects of Telerehabilitation-based Exercise Trainings on Gait and Balance in Parkinson's Patients
NCT04694872
Comparison of an Exoskeleten With an End-effector for Assisted Gait Training in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03544398
Upper Limb Cross-education in Subacute Stroke
NCT04113369
Spinal Stabilization Exercises in Individuals With Transtibial Amputatıon
NCT04114175
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients in groups will be evaluated before and after treatment following methods. - Demographic and disease-specific clinical evaluation form: Personal and disease information of patients will be collected with a patient follow-up form. While personal information section of patient follow-up form includes the name-surname, age, gender, height, weight, smoking-alcohol use, occupation, education and marital status. information about the disease, information about stroke, assistive device used, treatments date. Systemic disease finding, drugs currently used, and history of disease onset and development Balance assessment- "Berg Balance Scale (BBS)", "Functional Reach Test", "Trunk Impairment Scale ", "Single Leg Stance Test (SLST)" and "TechnoBody" device will be performed. .
Posture evaluation - to be done with "PostureScreen Mobile" Functionality assessment: -" Time Up-Go Test", "30 - second Chair Stand Test". Mental condition: Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) Daily Life Activities: Functional Independence Measures (FIM) will be evaluated. First group will be included, balance program with "TechnoBody" device. Second group will be taken balance program with "Thera-Trainer" device. Results of both groups will be compared after 4 weeks. Both groups will be applied 5 days of week
1. Exercise bike with visual feedback, which allows active-assisted or resistant work according to condition patient, will be done in lower limb for 10 minutes.
2. Nmes- (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) will be applied to hemiparetic limb for 10 minutes.
3. Bobath Method- 30 minutes
4. First Group-TechnoBody balance training (15 min / 5 days a week, 4 weeks) Second Group-Thera-Trainer balance training (15 min / 5 days a week, 4 weeks)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
TechnoBody
TechnoBody
1\. Group-TechnoBody balance training (15 min / 5 days a week, 4 weeks) In the study, the first group will be included in the balance program with the "TechnoBody" device Patients will be applied 5 days of week
1. Exercise bike with visual feedback, which allows active-assisted or resistant work according to the condition of the patient, will be done in the lower limb for 10 minutes.
2. Nmes- (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) will be applied to the hemiparetic limb for 10 minutes.
3. Bobath Method- 30 minutes
Group 2
Thera Trainer
Thera-Trainer
2\. Group-Thera-Trainer balance training (15 min / 5 days a week, 4 weeks) the second group will be taken into the balance program with the "Thera-Trainer" device and the results of both groups will be compared after 4 weeks.
Patients will be applied 5 days of week
1. Exercise bike with visual feedback, which allows active-assisted or resistant work according to the condition of the patient, will be done in the lower limb for 10 minutes.
2. Nmes- (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) will be applied to the hemiparetic limb for 10 minutes.
3. Bobath Method- 30 minutes
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TechnoBody
1\. Group-TechnoBody balance training (15 min / 5 days a week, 4 weeks) In the study, the first group will be included in the balance program with the "TechnoBody" device Patients will be applied 5 days of week
1. Exercise bike with visual feedback, which allows active-assisted or resistant work according to the condition of the patient, will be done in the lower limb for 10 minutes.
2. Nmes- (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) will be applied to the hemiparetic limb for 10 minutes.
3. Bobath Method- 30 minutes
Thera-Trainer
2\. Group-Thera-Trainer balance training (15 min / 5 days a week, 4 weeks) the second group will be taken into the balance program with the "Thera-Trainer" device and the results of both groups will be compared after 4 weeks.
Patients will be applied 5 days of week
1. Exercise bike with visual feedback, which allows active-assisted or resistant work according to the condition of the patient, will be done in the lower limb for 10 minutes.
2. Nmes- (Neuromuscular electrical stimulation) will be applied to the hemiparetic limb for 10 minutes.
3. Bobath Method- 30 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 6 months have passed since the stroke
* To cooperate,
* No visual problems
* Scoring of Mini Mental test 18-23
* Can walk with auxiliary device or completely independently
* Robust side can stand at least 30 seconds in one leg balance
* Patients walking independently 10 meter with or without any assistive walking device
Exclusion Criteria
* Accompanying lower motor neuron disease or peripheral nerve lesion
* Presence of other neurological disorders such as accompanying ataxia, dystonia, dyskinesia
* An important comorbid disease that may prevent rehabilitation such as serious heart disease (aortic stenosis, angina, arrhythmia, pacemaker) and uncontrolled hypertension
* Having vision problems
65 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Naziye Ş CEYHAN, PhD
PhD student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Naziye Şenyuva Ceyhan, MscPt
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Istanbul University Cerrapasa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
İstanbul University Cerrapasa
Istanbul, Alkent 2000, 34500 Büyükçekmece/İstanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ıstanbulıucnazıye
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.