Investigation Of The Relationship Between Imagery Ability, Balance And Functionality After Stroke
NCT ID: NCT04832334
Last Updated: 2021-12-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-20
2021-09-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The individuals included in the study will be divided into two groups:
Group 1: Stroke Patients Group 2: Control Group
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stroke Participants
Stroke patients with hemiplegia or chronic hemiparesis
Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test.
Imagery ability was determined.
Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test
Balance level was determined.
Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale
Functionality was evaluated.
Healthy Participants
The healthy control group was matched with stroke participants in terms of age, gender, dominant side and education level.
Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test.
Imagery ability was determined.
Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test
Balance level was determined.
Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale
Functionality was evaluated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test.
Imagery ability was determined.
Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test
Balance level was determined.
Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale
Functionality was evaluated.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Not having any neurological disorder other than stroke
* Not having vision problems that will affect the materials to be used during the treatment.
* To be able to communicate enough to understand the orders given
* Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) score of 24 and above
* Not having seen a visualization application before
* Being between the ages of 40-80
* To be similar in terms of age, gender, education level of individuals with stroke
Exclusion Criteria
* Unilateral neglect
* Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) score below 24 points
* Multiple stroke history
* Having pain and limitation of joint motion that will interfere with functional activity
* Walking restriction
* Serious communication or understanding problems
* Presence of serious cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic or orthopedic problems
* Presence of a secondary neurological disease
40 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medipol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
İkbal Tunç
Physiotherapist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fatma Mutluay, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
İstanbul Medipol University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul Medipol University
Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cho HY, Kim JS, Lee GC. Effects of motor imagery training on balance and gait abilities in post-stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013 Aug;27(8):675-80. doi: 10.1177/0269215512464702. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
Amesz S, Tessari A, Ottoboni G, Marsden J. An observational study of implicit motor imagery using laterality recognition of the hand after stroke. Brain Inj. 2016;30(8):999-1004. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2016.1147600. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
Liepert J, Greiner J, Nedelko V, Dettmers C. Reduced upper limb sensation impairs mental chronometry for motor imagery after stroke: clinical and electrophysiological findings. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Jun;26(5):470-8. doi: 10.1177/1545968311425924. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
Morioka S, Osumi M, Nishi Y, Ishigaki T, Ishibashi R, Sakauchi T, Takamura Y, Nobusako S. Motor-imagery ability and function of hemiplegic upper limb in stroke patients. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019 Feb 17;6(3):596-604. doi: 10.1002/acn3.739. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC. Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. 2006 Jul;37(7):1941-52. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc. Epub 2006 Jun 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Medipol Hospital 21
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id