6-year Clinical Performance of Prefabricated and Composite Veneers ( Componeer)
NCT ID: NCT05998980
Last Updated: 2023-08-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-01
2017-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
30 volunteer patients without systemic diseases and who applied to Ege University School of Dentistry for the esthetic restoration of their anterior diastema (gap) were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The closure of 102 diastema was randomly performed with prefabricated composite resin veneers (n=15; indirect method- Componeer, Coltène, Altstätten, Switzerland) or direct composite resin veneers (n=15; direct method- Essentia, GC, Japan). These restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, 1-2-6-year by two experienced and blind examiners according to modified Ryge criteria (USPHS criteria). Color match, marginal discoloration, anatomic form, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, surface roughness, retention, and polishing retention were evaluated for that purpose. Statistical analysis was performed with McNemar and Chi-square tests (p\<0.05).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
3-year Clinical Performance of Prefabricated and Composite Veneers
NCT05984472
Layering Technique Selection for Ultimate Aesthetics in Anterior Composites
NCT02999880
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Injectable Resin Composite Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18-months.
NCT05389163
Effect of Preparation Design on the Functional and Esthetic Outcome of CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Laminate Veneers
NCT04840524
Survival of Hybrid Laminate Veneers Using Two Different Tooth Preparation Techniques:Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04515069
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of Ege University, Izmir, Turkey (16-2.1/8; 01.04.2016). 30 patients without any systemic diseases (10 males, 20 females, mean age: 34) and with aesthetic complaints on their anterior teeth were treated with 102 restorations (48 Componeer and 54 Essentia).
In Group 1; 48 teeth (15 patients) were restored with Componeer prefabricated veneers (Coltène, Altstätten, Switzerland) in combination with Synergy D6 nanohybrid resin composite (Coltène) and One Coat Bond (Coltène) adhesive system. In Group 2; 54 teeth (15 patients) were restored with Essentia (GC, Japan) micro-hybrid resin composite in combination with G-Premio Bond (GC) adhesive system.
Periodontal treatments, fillings, and bleaching treatments were performed, if necessary, before any veneer treatment. For the pre-treatment records; 3 photographs (smile, anterior occlusion, and upper anterior teeth alone) were taken from each patient. Both groups used the "Button Try" technique for color selection. Componeer sizing guide was used for size selection in Group 1. Then teeth were cleaned with non-fluoride pumice (Cleanic; Kerr Dental, ABD) using a polishing brush. Isolation of the teeth and retraction of the lips were achieved with a rubber dam (OptraDam, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein). Prefabricated veneers were prepared for the cementation process in Group 1. Then the labial surfaces were etched using 36% phosphoric acid for 30 s. The etched surfaces were rinsed for 30 s and dried. One Coat Bond (Coltene) adhesive system was applied on the labial surfaces of the teeth in accordance with user instructions in both groups. In Group 1; Synergy D6 nano hybrid resin composite was placed on the inner surfaces of the prefabricated veneers before being applied on appropriate teeth. Then the restorations were light-cured for 40 s from each surface (D-Light Pro, GC) and polished with a polishing paste (Prisma Gloss Extra Fine, Dentsply, NY, ABD) and a felt wheel.
In Group 2; Essentia (GC) micro-hybrid resin composite with dentin color was placed on the labial surfaces of the teeth and light-cured (D-Light Pro, GC). After that layer, Essentia enamel shades were placed over the labial surface of the tooth and light-cured for 20 s from each surface. The diamond bur contouring was performed and polishing discs (Super-Snap Rainbow Technique Kit, SHOFU) were used. For polishing purposes, a polishing paste (Prisma Gloss Extra Fine, Dentsply, NY, ABD) and a felt Wheel were used.
In group 1; gingival borders were adapted with contouring and polishing discs (Super-Snap Rainbow Technique Kit, SHOFU). Then proximal surfaces were polished using proximal sandpaper strips. Occlusion was checked for premature contacts. Two calibrated observers who were blinded to the objective of this study performed the evaluations. Color match, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, anatomic form, retention, secondary caries, and gloss retention were the properties evaluated for the restorations at baseline, 1-2-6-year using Modified Ryge Criteria (USPHS Criteria). Statistical analysis was performed with McNemar and Chi-square tests (p\<0.05).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Componeer Prefabricated Veneers
Componeer veneers (device 1) were randomly applied to patients. The teeth were evaluated in terms of color and size matching in order to select the correct veneers. Componeer sizing guide was used for size selection. Prefabricated veneers were adapted to the teeth' surfaces. Then, the inner surfaces of the prefabricated veneers were roughened to obtain better mechanical retention. Then the labial surfaces of the teeth were etched using 36% phosphoric acid. The etched surfaces were rinsed and dried. An adhesive system was applied to the teeth. Prefabricated veneers' inner surfaces were cleaned with alcohol, and One Coat dental adhesive was applied. Synergy D6 nanohybrid resin composite was placed on the inner surfaces of the veneers and transferred to the teeth. The restorations were light-cured for 40 s Gingival borders were adapted with contouring and polishing discs (intervention 1).
Componeer prefabricated veneers
Individual Randomized Clinical Trial
Essentia resin composite venners
Direct resin composite restorations were randomly applied to patients. Essentia resin composite (device 2) shade guide was used for color selection. After the preparation, the labial surfaces of the teeth were etched using 36% phosphoric acid. The etched surfaces were then rinsed and dried. An adhesive system G-Premio Bond was applied to the teeth. Then Essentia micro-hybrid resin composite with dentin shade was placed on labial surfaces of teeth and was light-cured. Then enamel shade was placed on the tooth. After that, the resin composite veneer was light-cured for 20 s from each surface. Proximal surfaces were polished using proximal sandpaper strips (intervention 2).
Essentia resin composite veneers
Individual Randomized Clinical Trial
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Componeer prefabricated veneers
Individual Randomized Clinical Trial
Essentia resin composite veneers
Individual Randomized Clinical Trial
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having diastema in the anterior teeth without any caries
* Not having an occlusal anomaly such as bruxism or anterior crossbite
* Having a good oral hygiene
* Agreeing to come to the recall sessions regularly for 6 years
* Being over the age of 18
Exclusion Criteria
* Having insufficient oral hygiene
* Being pregnant
* Having a systemic disease
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ege University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sebnem Turkun
Prof. Dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sebnem L Turkun, DDS,PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ege University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ege University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative
Izmir, Bornova, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16-2.1/8
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.