Bulk-fill With Different Technique Three-year Clinical Performance

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-09

Study Completion Date

2024-05-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current study will be intended to evaluate and compare three-year clinical performance of class II bulk-fill resin composite restorations placed with different techniques.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Versus Self-Adhesive Resin Composite Restorative Systems

NCT06543680

Secondary Caries Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity

RECRUITING NA

Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Injectable Resin Composite Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18-months.

NCT05389163

Class V Dental Caries

COMPLETED NA

Esthetic and Clinical Assessment of Injectable Resin Composite Technique

NCT05945758

Clinical Performance

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Evaluation of Bioactive Giomer Material Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation

NCT06497231

Deep Caries Dental Caries

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Pontic Site Development Using Soft Tissue Augmentation

NCT03834649

Alveolar Bone Loss

UNKNOWN PHASE3

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fifty patients with proximal carious lesion in permanent molars were included in the study. A total eighty class II cavities were restored with one of the following bulk-fill resin composite with their adhesive systems (n=20) Filtek™ Bulk Fill, Heated Filtek™ Bulk Fill, G-aenial™ BULK Injectable or Sonicfill3. Double blinded randomized clinical trial with survival and clinical quality were evaluated at baseline, after 12 , 24 and 36months using modified FDI(Fédération dentaire internationale) World Dental Federation criteria

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bulk-fill Which is Special Type of Resin Composite Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Multi-arm parallel design was followed in this study. There were four group according to placement techniques of bulk-fill resin composite restorations. Each group received 20 restored class II cavities.

All the restorations will be clinically evaluated after 1 week(baseline), 12, 24 and 36 months. Restoration will be evaluated using FDI criteria

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Body Bulk-Fill

20 cavity class II restored with Body bulk-fill Resin composite

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL