Effect of a Pharmacist-led, Collaborative Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Persons with Diabetes
NCT ID: NCT05995262
Last Updated: 2024-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-06
2025-04-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Several studies have also demonstrated reductions in hospitalizations and/or ED visits for patients enrolled in pharmacist-led collaborative practice models. While the literature as a whole clearly describes the impact of ambulatory pharmacist intervention in achieving guideline-based clinical goals (i.e., HbA1c, blood pressure), few studies have reported on adherence with guideline-driven pharmacotherapy pre- and post-pharmacist intervention, or on pharmacist impact in reducing medication burden.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Collaborative Care Model on Type 2 Diabetic Patients
NCT03553862
Diabetes Outcomes in COVID-19 Pandemic
NCT04573335
Clinical Phenotype and Outcomes of Inpatients With COVID-19 and Diabetes
NCT04550403
Physician-initiated Medication Review in a Type 2 Diabetes Outpatient Clinic
NCT05501223
Effect of Internet Therapeutic Intervention on A1C Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
NCT00814190
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Within these teams, ambulatory care pharmacists are uniquely equipped to utilize their strong background in pharmacotherapy to provide chronic disease state medication management services for core primary care disease states, such as diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. In many settings, ambulatory care pharmacists work under collaborative practice agreements (CPA), which are legal arrangements between pharmacists and physicians that allow for expanded services. The additional abilities granted within CPAs allow clinical pharmacists to assume professional responsibility by performing patient assessments, counseling, and referrals; ordering laboratory tests; administering drugs; and selecting, initiating, monitoring, continuing, and adjusting drug regimens. By allowing pharmacists to take on this prescribing role within a multidisciplinary team, patients receive more individualized, patient-centered care as recommended by ADA's Standard of Care in Diabetes and there is reduced clinical inertia (i.e., lack of treatment intensification in a patient not at evidence-based goals for care). In fact, patients receiving care from pharmacists under CPA were shown to have significantly better outcomes compared to patients receiving "usual care" without pharmacist intervention. Studies in a variety of ambulatory settings have illustrated that pharmacist intervention can significantly improve clinical outcomes in terms of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) level, blood pressure control, lipid panels, and body mass index. One study of a pharmacist-driven type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)-targeted collaborative practice in an urban underserved clinic demonstrated significant improvements not only in HbA1c and tobacco cessation but also in guideline recommended utilization of statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers. Several studies have also demonstrated reductions in hospitalizations and/or ED visits for patients enrolled in pharmacist-led collaborative practice models. While the literature as a whole clearly describes the impact of ambulatory pharmacist intervention in achieving guideline-based clinical goals (i.e., HbA1c, blood pressure), few studies have reported on adherence with guideline-driven pharmacotherapy pre- and post-pharmacist intervention, or on pharmacist impact in reducing medication burden.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HbA1c
Minimum of one HbA1c reading within 90 days prior to first visit AND one HgbA1c reading within 90 days after the last clinic encounter
Chart Review
Data collection via retrospective chart review of patients from the Cedar Hill Clinic who had at least two visits with the clinical pharmacist between January 5, 2022 through December 31, 2022
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chart Review
Data collection via retrospective chart review of patients from the Cedar Hill Clinic who had at least two visits with the clinical pharmacist between January 5, 2022 through December 31, 2022
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum of two visits with clinical pharmacist during 2022
* Minimum of one HbA1c reading within 90 days prior to first visit AND one HgbA1c reading within 90 days after the last clinic encounter
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Methodist Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Melanie Proffitt, PharmD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Methodist Health System
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
115.PHA.2022.C
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.