Changing the Natural History of Type 2 Diabetes ("CHANGE" Study)
NCT ID: NCT05040087
Last Updated: 2025-05-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
127 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-01
2027-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Study to Investigate the Benefits of the Early Detection and Intensive Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00318032
Gastric Emptying - Implications for the Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes
NCT03864562
Rate of Change of HbA1c (dx/dt) May Predict Progression to Type 2 DM
NCT01315808
Effect of Internet Therapeutic Intervention on A1C Levels in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
NCT00814190
SGLT2 Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes and Left Ventricular Remodeling in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction, a Prospective, Multi-center Registry Study
NCT05770687
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I.A. RATIONALE The investigators will test the hypothesis that maintenance of normoglycemia can prevent the typical worsening of hyperglycemia in early type 2 diabetes (DM) compared to usual care.
Progression of hyperglycemia is mediated by loss of β-cell function, which will be mitigated by normalizing glucose levels, reducing the "excitotoxicity" leading to dedifferentiation and apoptosis. When lifestyle change or Rx reduced progression from prediabetes (PreDM) to DM, there was no "catch-up" after trials ended - cumulative DM remained less than in controls, consistent with a change in the natural history. Reaching normal glucose is beneficial regardless of the intervention: in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP), PreDM subjects who achieved normal glucose levels only once, had 56% less DM in the DPP Outcomes Study \[DPPOS\] - similar in lifestyle change, metformin, and control groups. But if treatment is begun too late, even 10 kg weight loss may not lead to DM remission.
I.B. FEATURES OF THE APPROACH - easy to translate into practice.
This study will be novel: 1) Aim for normal glucose, instead of testing Rx or mechanisms \[as in STOP DIABETES, DPP, and RISE\], since lowering glucose per se improves β-cell function. 2) Start early in the natural history, instead of late \[as in ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT\], allowing use of Rx with a low risk of hypoglycemia; severe hypoglycemia was unusual in ORIGIN, where DM duration was only 5.5 years. 3) Target early DM instead of PreDM \[DREAM, DPP, ACT NOW, and STOP DIABETES\], allowing use of Rx FDA approved for DM. 4) Accelerated stepped intensification of Rx to keep glucose normal, vs. \< 10% reaching a normal OGTT 3 times in the DPP, only 15% reaching a normal OGTT with metformin over 2 years in RISE, and lack of normalization in other studies.
I.C. AIMS - assess effect size, β-cell function, retinopathy, nephropathy, CGM, cost-effectiveness.
Methods: To ensure separation of treatment arms, the investigators will study DM expected to progress. 126 adults will be randomized to ensure that 102 complete the study, allowing for dropouts, 1/3 in each of 3 groups: (i) A1c 6.0-6.9%, no Rx; (ii) A1c 6.0-6.9%, on metformin; (iii) A1c 7.0-7.4%, on metformin. All will have DM by OGTT + 1 hour OGTT glucose ≥155 mg/dl to increase the risk of progression. After a 2-week run-in to establish tolerance to metformin (if not on it already) and adherence to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), all will have a lifestyle intervention \[VA MOVE!, similar to the DPP\], and HbA1c and 2 weeks of continuous glucose monitoring (Abbott CGM) every 3 months. Randomization will be 1:1 within each group, to intensive Rx: adding Rx if SMBG levels are \> goal (\<100 mg/dl premeal and \<130 postmeal) ≥3x/week 2 weeks in a row after ≥4 weeks of maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) of Rx; metformin (if not on it already), + TZD pioglitazone, + GLP-1 RA semaglutide, + SGLT-2 empagliflozin, + glargine insulin; or control Rx: adding Rx in the same order, based on HbA1c every 3 months; initial added Rx for HbA1c ≥7.0%, subsequent Rx for HbA1c ≥7.5% \[similar to use in GRADE and typical VA practice\].
Outcomes: Over 2.5 years, plus a 3-month washout, the investigators will quantitate (i) effect size - differences in HbA1c with intensive Rx vs. controls - from the Rx paradigm, expected to be 5.2-5.6% vs. 6.5-7.4%, respectively; and (ii) β-cell function \[in 3-hour OGTTs with modeling as in RISE\], since trends with intensive vs. control Rx post-washout may indicate whether β-cell function is likely to be sustained, consistent with the conclusions of the RISE Consortium. The investigators will also explore (iii) retinopathy (blinded evaluation of fundus photographs); (iv) nephropathy (microalbuminuria and eGFR); (v) whether CGM after ≥3 weeks of MTD could be substituted for SMBG in identifying need for intensification, and (vi) cost-effectiveness.
I.D. HYPOTHESIZED CLINICAL IMPACT OF EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND KEEPING GLUCOSE NORMAL:
Evidence from DM prevention and intervention studies allows us to predict that keeping glucose normal will be safe - and longterm benefits will include reduced complications, mortality, and costs.
II. SIGNIFICANCE
If a definitive trial demonstrates that keeping glucose normal sustains β-cell function, a change in practice to include this model of intensive Rx should improve both health, and healthcare system resource use and costs. The next step would be to plan a study of impact on renal and retinal outcomes - since lifestyle interventions are now widespread, the Rx classes used have a low risk of hypoglycemia and are going off patent, and this experience in overcoming clinical inertia should facilitate implementation.
III. EXPERIMENTAL PLAN
The investigators have a simple design; instead of mechanisms such as insulin action and secretion, eligibility, screening, and interventions will be based only on glucose and HbA1c, to facilitate translation to routine clinical practice. The goals are to (i) establish effect size (differences in HbA1c), (ii) determine if β cell function can be sustained, and (iii) explore retinopathy, nephropathy, cost effectiveness, and potential substitution of CGM for SMBG, to help define the sample size for a subsequent multicenter study.
IV. INTERVENTIONS
IV.A. LIFESTYLE CHANGE SUPPORT - FOR ALL PARTICIPANTS
The VA's "MOVE!" group lifestyle change program is modeled after the DPP, with similar goals - 7% weight loss for those with BMI \>25, and \>150 minutes a week of exercise. Other recommendations to PCPs will be per ADA DM guidelines, similar to the VADT - BP, lipid control, etc.
IV.B. CONTROL Rx - INTENSIFICATION BASED ON HbA1c LEVELS, DETERMINED EVERY 3 MONTHS (see below).
IV.C. INTENSIVE Rx - INTENSIFICATION BASED ON SMBG, DONE AN AVERAGE OF ONCE A DAY (see below).
V. POTENTIAL IMPACT ON CLINICAL PRACTICE
This study (and a follow-up multicenter study) are aimed to change medical practice. If the studies are positive as expected, screening to find early DM, and management aimed at normal glucose, should become routine. Moreover, since hyperglycemia in usual care reaches HbA1c levels much higher than in controls \[insulin is frequently begun when HbA1c is \>9%\], the real-world difference from intensive Rx \[HbA1c 5.2-5.6%\] would be correspondingly greater, with a greater impact on health, resource use, and costs. Years of lower glucose, through "legacy effects", should reduce DM complications and costs, particularly in high-risk groups - with potential benefit to individuals, health care systems, and society.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
USE OF DIABETES Rx GUIDED LARGELY BY HbA1c LEVELS
Extended-release \[ER\] metformin will be added if HbA1c is ≥7.0% after 3 months; if already used and maximized, pioglitazone will be begun. Other Rx will be added each time HbA1c reaches ≥7.5%. The sequence of Rx will be the same as in intensive Rx subjects; those using insulin will also do prebreakfast SMBG, aiming for glucose \<100 mg/dl.
Intensification of diabetes medication based largely on HbA1c levels
Use of diabetes Rx in controls will be guided largely by HbA1c levels.
USE OF DIABETES Rx GUIDED BY SELF-MONITORED BLOOD GLUCOSE (SMBG)
1. Guidance by SMBG:
2. Glucose goals: We will aim for \<100 mg/dl premeal (2), \<130 postmeal.
3. Monitoring will include pre-breakfast 2x/wk, and a 5-point profile 1x/wk (before and 1.5-2.5 hr after breakfast, before lunch, before supper, and bedtime).
4. Added Rx will be used if SMBG is \>goal ≥3x in 2 consecutive weeks after ≥4 weeks of MOVE! and/or the previous Rx \[e.g., any 3 of the 7 goals (\<100 mg/dl premeal, \<130 post)\]. Metformin ER will be given first (if not already on it), and increased to 2000 mg/day if there are no side effects. (If metformin is not tolerated, it will be stopped and the second Rx will become the "first Rx" and given instead. If other Rx are not tolerated, the next Rx will be used. The second Rx will be the TZD pioglitazone, followed by the GLP-1 RA semaglutide, then the SGLT-2 inhibitor empagliflozin. If still above goal, glargine insulin will be added, titrated to keep fasting glucose \<100 mg/dl.
Intensification of diabetes medication based on glucose levels
Use of diabetes Rx in the intensive Rx groups will be guided by participants' self-monitored blood glucose levels (SMBG), with management aimed to keep glucose levels within the normal range.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intensification of diabetes medication based largely on HbA1c levels
Use of diabetes Rx in controls will be guided largely by HbA1c levels.
Intensification of diabetes medication based on glucose levels
Use of diabetes Rx in the intensive Rx groups will be guided by participants' self-monitored blood glucose levels (SMBG), with management aimed to keep glucose levels within the normal range.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* age 40-75 years
* HbA1c 6.0-7.4%
* 1 hr OGTT glucose \>155 mg/dl in each group
Exclusion Criteria
* systemic glucocorticoids
* bariatric surgery
* stage III-IV congestive heart failure
* severe angina
* life expectancy \<5 years
* BMI \>40 kg/m2
* pregnancy
* pancreatitis
* family or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia 2a
* an estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] of ≤50 ml/min
* an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level \>3x the upper limit of the normal range
* dementia
40 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
NIH
Emory University
OTHER
Abbott Diabetes Care
INDUSTRY
Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mary Rhee, MD
Professor of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mary K Rhee, MD, MSCR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta VA Medical Center
Lawrence S Phillips, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Atlanta VA Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Phillips LS, Ratner RE, Buse JB, Kahn SE. We can change the natural history of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2668-76. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0817.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2107
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.