NSAID Injection Versus Corticosteroid Injection for Basilar Thumb Arthritis
NCT ID: NCT05992883
Last Updated: 2025-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-28
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ketorolac Versus Triamcinolone Knee Injections for Osteoarthritis
NCT02295189
Corticosteroid Against Saline Injections for Thumb Osteoarthritis (CASITOA)
NCT06401317
Ketorolac in Upper Extremity Tendinopathy and Arthropathy
NCT05292339
Comparison of the Efficacy of Intra-articular Hybrid Hyaluronic Acid and Steroid in Patients With Rizoarthrosis
NCT03200886
Single Blinded First CMC Osteoarthritis Treatment
NCT03196310
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although used infrequently, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are another modality of nonoperative intervention for basilar thumb arthritis. Intraarticular injections of NSAIDs have demonstrated success in alleviating the symptoms of primary arthritis in the hip and knee without concern of systemic side effects compared to oral NSAID use. Additionally, injectable NSAIDs are significantly more cost-effective compared to other injectables and do not have the chondrotoxic profile of corticosteroids. However, there are few studies directly comparing intraarticular NSAID use to other injectable therapies.
Given the potential clinical and economic benefits of injectable NSAID therapy, we propose a clinical trial investigation examining the efficacy of intraarticular ketorolac versus intraarticular triamcinolone in treating symptoms of moderate to advanced primary osteoarthritis of the basilar thumb. The prospect of successfully alleviating symptoms of joint degeneration without propagating the progression of disease would be invaluable to the thousands of patients in the Mayo Clinic system and elsewhere afflicted with basilar thumb arthritis without the means or ability to pursue stem cell therapeutics or more definitive, operative intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)
Patients will proceed to their injection appointment within 4 weeks of their initial evaluation. At the injection appointment, patients will receive an injection containing 1.0 mL of ketorolac 15 mg/mL (15 mg total of ketorolac).
Ketorolac
Intervention will be an injection containing 1.0 mL of ketorolac 15 mg/mL (15 mg total of ketorolac).
Corticosteroid
Patients will proceed to their injection appointment within 4 weeks of their initial evaluation. At the injection appointment, patients will receive an injection containing 0.5 mL of triamcinolone 40 mg/mL (20 mg total of triamcinolone).
Triamcinolone
Intervention will be an injection containing 0.5 mL of triamcinolone 40 mg/mL (20 mg total of triamcinolone).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ketorolac
Intervention will be an injection containing 1.0 mL of ketorolac 15 mg/mL (15 mg total of ketorolac).
Triamcinolone
Intervention will be an injection containing 0.5 mL of triamcinolone 40 mg/mL (20 mg total of triamcinolone).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Pain at the thumb base brought on by direct pressure (grind test) and with movement
* Pain resistant to previous conservative management (including over the counter medications (ibuprofen/acetaminophen), icing, splinting/braces, or topical analgesics)
* Radiological observation indicative of arthritis based on the Eaton-Littler classification system (stages 1 through 4)
* Patient understands the protocol and signed the informed consent
* Patient is covered by health insurance
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient's analgesic treatment regimen or other modalities of managing symptoms/pain associated with their hand pathology was modified within four weeks before trial inclusion
* Symptomatic Scaphoid-trapezial arthritis present
* Localized or systemic infection
* Previous thumb surgery on study thumb
* Previous thumb injury on study thumb
* Patient with inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis)
* Severe and/or uncontrolled hypertension
* De Quervain tendinopathy present
* History of injection to the trapeziometacarpal joint on study thumb within the previous 6 weeks
* Uncontrolled diabetes
* Pregnant or lactating females. Female participants of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test before the injection. Women without childbearing potential (ie., surgically sterile with hysterectomy and/or bilateral oophorectomy and/or bilateral salpingectomy OR ≥ 12 months of amenorrhea and at least 50 years of age) are eligible to participate without completing a pregnancy test.
* Immunodeficient patients
* Patients that are currently using nicotine products, or who have quit in the last 12 months
* Patients under guardianship, curatorship, or are otherwise not self-sufficient
* Patients participating in another clinical research trial which interferes with this study protocol or outcomes
* Patients unable to follow the protocol in the investigators' judgement.
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marco Rizzo
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marco Rizzo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Mayo Clinic Clinical Trials
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
22-005275
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.