Study of Intra-articular Injections vs Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee

NCT ID: NCT01887678

Last Updated: 2018-04-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

287 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-30

Study Completion Date

2014-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined Traumeel® / Zeel® injection against placebo (saline) in patients with moderate-to-severe pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of Traumeel® and Zeel® co-administered intra-articular (IA) injections vs placebo IA injections on the change in knee pain in patients with moderate to severe knee pain associated with osteoarthritis.

The secondary objectives are to evaluate reduction of pain and stiffness and change in physical function.

Safety is evaluated by the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events during the treatment period and follow up period for all randomized patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution

Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one intra articular (IA) injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one IA injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.

Placebo injectable solution

Injection volume of placebo is 4.2 mL as well (taken from the 10.0 mL vial by unblinded staff member, rest to be kept for drug accountability)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo is an injection of Saline

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution

Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one IA injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo is an injection of Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Traumeel Zeel Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee by American College of Rheumatology criteria
2. Men or women between 45-80 years of age.
3. Have documented diagnosis of primary OA of the target knee based on clinical and radiographic criteria (Kellgren-Lawrence Numerical Grading System of Grade 2-3) in the tibial-femoral compartment of the target knee confirmed by standard post-anterior weightbearing X-ray of the knee in full extension taken \</= 6 months prior to Visit 1.
4. Currently taking an Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), or acetaminophen on a regular basis (4-7 days/ week) over last 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 and has experienced amelioration of pain on these medications.
5. Must have a 50-foot walk test pain score of less than 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS in the target knee at screening
6. Pain in the non-target (contralateral) knee must not be greater than 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS on 50-foot walk test, and the target knee must be more symptomatic.
7. Willingness to stop all OA treatments.
8. Fully informed of the risks of entering the study and willing to provide written consent to enter the study.
9. Able to understand and be willing to comply with all study requirements, particularly the weekly injection regimen for administration of study drug.
10. Primary complaint is pain immediately following an unassisted 50-foot walk. They must show:

1. moderate to severe pain score in the target knee as demonstrated by 40 - 90 mm recorded on a 100 mm VAS, and
2. 20 mm increase in pain from their screening visit pain score (a "flare")
3. pain in the non-target (contralateral) knee must \</= 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the components of Traumeel or Zeel
2. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to acetaminophen.
3. Has body mass index (BMI) \>38 kg/m2.
4. Avoidance of, or aversion to, nonprescription medications.
5. Clinical symptoms of meniscal instability or significant valgus/ varus that requires corrective osteotomy
6. Any major injury or surgery to the target knee in the prior 12 months.
7. One or a combination of the following co-morbidities:

1. other inflammatory arthropathies, gout or pseudogout within previous 6 months
2. avascular necrosis
3. severe bone or joint deformity in target knee
4. osteonecrosis of either knee
5. fibromyalgia
6. pes anserine bursitis
7. lumbar radiculopathy with referred pain to either knee
8. neurogenic or vascular claudication
9. significant anterior knee pain due to diagnosed isolated patella-femoral syndrome in the target knee
10. target knee joint infection or skin disorder/infection to the area surrounding the knee within previous 6 months
11. current treatment or treatment of cancer within the previous 2 years (excluding basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
8. Participated in any experimental drug or device study within the prior one (1) month and/or IA injections six (6) months.
9. Referred pain from other joints
10. Significantly debilitating concurrent infection(s)
11. Significant ligamentous instability
12. Any prior viscosupplementation therapy (in target knee) within 6 months prior to Screening
13. Systemic or IA injection of corticosteroids in any joint within 3 months of enrollment
14. Therapy with oral hyaluronic acid products, and/or oral pharmaceutical products containing glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulphate and/or diacerein
15. Therapy with opioids within the last 90 days including intra-dermal delivery systems (patches)
16. Therapy with autologous stem cells
17. Therapy with coumarins such as warfarin, Coumadin; heparin and derivative substances including low molecular weight heparin, synthetic pentasaccharide inhibitors of factor Xa such as fondaparinux and idraparinux; direct factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban; direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin, lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban and dabigatran.
18. Concomitant inflammatory or other rheumatologic, neurological or cardiovascular diseases which could affect the evaluation of knee pain
19. Ongoing litigation for workers compensation for musculoskeletal injuries or disorders
20. Use of alcohol of more than 4 drinks per day
21. Clinically important axial deviation (varus, valgus) greater than 15 degrees
22. Concomitant severe OA of the hip or other joints, which might interfere with the assessments required by the study
23. Painful knee conditions other than OA (e.g., Paget's disease)
24. Hemiparesis of lower limbs
25. Significant planned surgery to lower limbs, which might interfere with the patient's ability to comply with study requirements
26. Presence of serious gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, cardiovascular, neurological disease that might interfere with the outcome of the study or the patient's ability to comply with study requirements
27. Presence of infections and/or skin diseases in the area of the injection site such as psoriasis
28. Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding or not using recognized effective contraceptive measures. Females of childbearing potential (including those less than one year post-menopausal) must agree to maintain reliable birth control throughout the study.
29. Clinically significant abnormal laboratory values.
30. Patients who are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nebojsa Skrepnik, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tucson Orthopaedic Institute

Royal Anspach, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clinical Research Advantage - Arizona II

Hans Barthel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hans Richard Barthel, M.D., Inc.

Shariar Cohen-Gadol, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Westlake Medical Research

David Bolshoun, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radiant Research Inc. - Denver

Linda Murray, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radiant Research Inc

Susan Hole, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riverside Clinical Research

Agustin Latorre, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AppleMed Research, Inc.

Richard Radnovich, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Injury Care Medical Center

Moges Sisay, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Global Scientific Innovations

Larkin T Wadsworth, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sundance Clinical Research, LLC

Kurian Abraham, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

New Hope Clinical Research

Rakesh Patel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PMG Research of Salisbury

George Raad, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PMG Research of Charlotte

Martin VanCleeff, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PMG Cary Medical Research

John Rubino, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PMG Research of Raleigh

Howard R Adelglass, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Research Across America - NY

Louis Re, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Manhattan Medical Research

Daniel Whitmer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clinical Inquest Center Ltd.

Jeffrey Klein, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radiant Research Inc. - Akron

Rakesh Davit, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sterling Research Group, Ltd.

Glenn Smith, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hillcrest Clinical Research

Shawn Saylor, DO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc

Alex Slandzicki, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clinical Research Solutions

Sadia Dar, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Clinical Research Solutions

Rickey Manning, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PMG Research of Knoxville

Paul Wakefield, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PMG Research of Knoxville

Michael R Adams, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radiant Research Inc. - Salt Lake City

Teresa Sligh, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Providence Clinical Research

David. Cardona, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universal BioPharma Research Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinical Research Advantage - Arizona II

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson Orthopaedic Institute

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Universal BioPharma Research Inc.

Dinuba, California, United States

Site Status

Providence Clinical Research

North Hollywood, California, United States

Site Status

Hans Richard Barthel, M.D., Inc.

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Site Status

Westlake Medical Research

Westlake Village, California, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research Inc. - Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Riverside Clinical Research

Edgewater, Florida, United States

Site Status

AppleMed Research, Inc.

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research Inc.

Pinellas Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Injury Care Medical Center

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Global Scientific Innovations

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Sundance Clinical Research, LLC

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Manhattan Medical Research

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Across America - NY

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

PMG Cary Medical Research

Cary, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

New Hope Clinical Research

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

PMG Research of Charlotte

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

PMG Research of Raleigh

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

PMG Research of Salisbury

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research Inc. - Akron

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Sterling Research Group, Ltd

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinical Inquest Center Ltd.

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Hillcrest Clinical Research

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc.

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Solutions

Franklin, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

PMG Research of Knoxville

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

PMG Research of Knoxville

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Solutions

Smyrna, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Radiant Research Inc. - Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lozada CJ, del Rio E, Reitberg DP, Smith RA, Kahn CB, Moskowitz RW. A double-blind, randomized, saline-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of co-administered intra-articular injections of Tr14 and Ze14 for treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the knee: The MOZArT trial. Eur J Integr Med 2017;13:54-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2017.07.005;

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C1301

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Celebrex Total Knee Arthroplasty Study
NCT00359151 TERMINATED PHASE4