Study of Intra-articular Injections vs Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT ID: NCT01887678
Last Updated: 2018-04-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
287 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-06-30
2014-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ketorolac Versus Triamcinolone Knee Injections for Osteoarthritis
NCT02295189
Gel-One Treatment in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT01934218
Effectiveness and Safety of Intra-articular SEMICAL GEL-B CROSS Therapy in Knee Osteoarthritis (SEM-ART1)
NCT06141018
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of X0002 Spray in Subjects With Osteoarthritis Knee Pain
NCT03081806
Gel-200 Versus Placebo in Osteoarthritis of the Knee
NCT00449696
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The secondary objectives are to evaluate reduction of pain and stiffness and change in physical function.
Safety is evaluated by the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events during the treatment period and follow up period for all randomized patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution
Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one intra articular (IA) injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.
Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution
Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one IA injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.
Placebo injectable solution
Injection volume of placebo is 4.2 mL as well (taken from the 10.0 mL vial by unblinded staff member, rest to be kept for drug accountability)
Placebo
Placebo is an injection of Saline
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution
Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one IA injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.
Placebo
Placebo is an injection of Saline
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Men or women between 45-80 years of age.
3. Have documented diagnosis of primary OA of the target knee based on clinical and radiographic criteria (Kellgren-Lawrence Numerical Grading System of Grade 2-3) in the tibial-femoral compartment of the target knee confirmed by standard post-anterior weightbearing X-ray of the knee in full extension taken \</= 6 months prior to Visit 1.
4. Currently taking an Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), or acetaminophen on a regular basis (4-7 days/ week) over last 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 and has experienced amelioration of pain on these medications.
5. Must have a 50-foot walk test pain score of less than 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS in the target knee at screening
6. Pain in the non-target (contralateral) knee must not be greater than 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS on 50-foot walk test, and the target knee must be more symptomatic.
7. Willingness to stop all OA treatments.
8. Fully informed of the risks of entering the study and willing to provide written consent to enter the study.
9. Able to understand and be willing to comply with all study requirements, particularly the weekly injection regimen for administration of study drug.
10. Primary complaint is pain immediately following an unassisted 50-foot walk. They must show:
1. moderate to severe pain score in the target knee as demonstrated by 40 - 90 mm recorded on a 100 mm VAS, and
2. 20 mm increase in pain from their screening visit pain score (a "flare")
3. pain in the non-target (contralateral) knee must \</= 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS
Exclusion Criteria
2. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to acetaminophen.
3. Has body mass index (BMI) \>38 kg/m2.
4. Avoidance of, or aversion to, nonprescription medications.
5. Clinical symptoms of meniscal instability or significant valgus/ varus that requires corrective osteotomy
6. Any major injury or surgery to the target knee in the prior 12 months.
7. One or a combination of the following co-morbidities:
1. other inflammatory arthropathies, gout or pseudogout within previous 6 months
2. avascular necrosis
3. severe bone or joint deformity in target knee
4. osteonecrosis of either knee
5. fibromyalgia
6. pes anserine bursitis
7. lumbar radiculopathy with referred pain to either knee
8. neurogenic or vascular claudication
9. significant anterior knee pain due to diagnosed isolated patella-femoral syndrome in the target knee
10. target knee joint infection or skin disorder/infection to the area surrounding the knee within previous 6 months
11. current treatment or treatment of cancer within the previous 2 years (excluding basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
8. Participated in any experimental drug or device study within the prior one (1) month and/or IA injections six (6) months.
9. Referred pain from other joints
10. Significantly debilitating concurrent infection(s)
11. Significant ligamentous instability
12. Any prior viscosupplementation therapy (in target knee) within 6 months prior to Screening
13. Systemic or IA injection of corticosteroids in any joint within 3 months of enrollment
14. Therapy with oral hyaluronic acid products, and/or oral pharmaceutical products containing glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulphate and/or diacerein
15. Therapy with opioids within the last 90 days including intra-dermal delivery systems (patches)
16. Therapy with autologous stem cells
17. Therapy with coumarins such as warfarin, Coumadin; heparin and derivative substances including low molecular weight heparin, synthetic pentasaccharide inhibitors of factor Xa such as fondaparinux and idraparinux; direct factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban; direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin, lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban and dabigatran.
18. Concomitant inflammatory or other rheumatologic, neurological or cardiovascular diseases which could affect the evaluation of knee pain
19. Ongoing litigation for workers compensation for musculoskeletal injuries or disorders
20. Use of alcohol of more than 4 drinks per day
21. Clinically important axial deviation (varus, valgus) greater than 15 degrees
22. Concomitant severe OA of the hip or other joints, which might interfere with the assessments required by the study
23. Painful knee conditions other than OA (e.g., Paget's disease)
24. Hemiparesis of lower limbs
25. Significant planned surgery to lower limbs, which might interfere with the patient's ability to comply with study requirements
26. Presence of serious gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, cardiovascular, neurological disease that might interfere with the outcome of the study or the patient's ability to comply with study requirements
27. Presence of infections and/or skin diseases in the area of the injection site such as psoriasis
28. Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding or not using recognized effective contraceptive measures. Females of childbearing potential (including those less than one year post-menopausal) must agree to maintain reliable birth control throughout the study.
29. Clinically significant abnormal laboratory values.
30. Patients who are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study.
45 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nebojsa Skrepnik, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
Royal Anspach, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Research Advantage - Arizona II
Hans Barthel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hans Richard Barthel, M.D., Inc.
Shariar Cohen-Gadol, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Westlake Medical Research
David Bolshoun, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radiant Research Inc. - Denver
Linda Murray, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radiant Research Inc
Susan Hole, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riverside Clinical Research
Agustin Latorre, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AppleMed Research, Inc.
Richard Radnovich, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Injury Care Medical Center
Moges Sisay, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Global Scientific Innovations
Larkin T Wadsworth, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
Kurian Abraham, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
New Hope Clinical Research
Rakesh Patel, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Salisbury
George Raad, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Charlotte
Martin VanCleeff, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Cary Medical Research
John Rubino, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Raleigh
Howard R Adelglass, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Research Across America - NY
Louis Re, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Manhattan Medical Research
Daniel Whitmer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Inquest Center Ltd.
Jeffrey Klein, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radiant Research Inc. - Akron
Rakesh Davit, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sterling Research Group, Ltd.
Glenn Smith, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hillcrest Clinical Research
Shawn Saylor, DO
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc
Alex Slandzicki, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Research Solutions
Sadia Dar, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Research Solutions
Rickey Manning, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Knoxville
Paul Wakefield, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Knoxville
Michael R Adams, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Radiant Research Inc. - Salt Lake City
Teresa Sligh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Providence Clinical Research
David. Cardona, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universal BioPharma Research Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinical Research Advantage - Arizona II
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Universal BioPharma Research Inc.
Dinuba, California, United States
Providence Clinical Research
North Hollywood, California, United States
Hans Richard Barthel, M.D., Inc.
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Westlake Medical Research
Westlake Village, California, United States
Radiant Research Inc. - Denver
Denver, Colorado, United States
Riverside Clinical Research
Edgewater, Florida, United States
AppleMed Research, Inc.
Miami, Florida, United States
Radiant Research Inc.
Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
Injury Care Medical Center
Boise, Idaho, United States
Global Scientific Innovations
Evansville, Indiana, United States
Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Manhattan Medical Research
New York, New York, United States
Research Across America - NY
New York, New York, United States
PMG Cary Medical Research
Cary, North Carolina, United States
New Hope Clinical Research
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
PMG Research of Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
PMG Research of Raleigh
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
PMG Research of Salisbury
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Radiant Research Inc. - Akron
Akron, Ohio, United States
Sterling Research Group, Ltd
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Clinical Inquest Center Ltd.
Dayton, Ohio, United States
Hillcrest Clinical Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc.
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
Clinical Research Solutions
Franklin, Tennessee, United States
PMG Research of Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
PMG Research of Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Clinical Research Solutions
Smyrna, Tennessee, United States
Radiant Research Inc. - Salt Lake City
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lozada CJ, del Rio E, Reitberg DP, Smith RA, Kahn CB, Moskowitz RW. A double-blind, randomized, saline-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of co-administered intra-articular injections of Tr14 and Ze14 for treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the knee: The MOZArT trial. Eur J Integr Med 2017;13:54-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2017.07.005;
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C1301
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.