HYPoxaEmic Respiratory Failure and Awake Prone Ventilation

NCT ID: NCT05990101

Last Updated: 2023-08-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

262 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-12

Study Completion Date

2028-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial is to determine if addition of awake prone positioning to standard oxygen, high flow oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation may reduce the rates of endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Effectiveness of prone position in mechanically ventilated patients was investigated extensively. During the Covid-19 pandemic a sudden increase in cases of acute respiratory failure, resulted in renewed interest and numerous studies on applying this concept in spontaneously breathing patients and using this in conjunction with less invasive respiratory support. However, evidence form the Covid-19 trials may not be directly extrapolated to other acute respiratory distress causes (for example bacterial pneumonia) as pathology of lung injury is distinctly different. Even though first reports of awake prone positioning were published nearly 30 years ago, but to date there are no prospective randomised trials in adult population treated for acute lung injury unrelated to Covid-19. Existing publications range from case reports (lung transplantation and drowning cases) to small feasibility trials involving 15-20 patients and also neonatal and paediatric populations. Considering that patients with acute lung injury constitute a significant proportion of routine intensive care unit population, results of this study would be highly relevant for the daily practice in intensive care medicine.We are aiming to conduct a prospective multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing standard care alone with awake prone positioning and standard care in spontaneously breathing patients admitted to Intensive or Intermediate Care Units for acute non-Covid-19 hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure Hypoxemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants will be allocated to the awake prone or standard care groups on a 1:1 ratio.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
By the nature of the awake prone intervention, it will not be possible to blind clinicians; however, interventions will be blinded to data analysts and outcome assessors.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

APP group

Awake prone position (APP) for 4 or more hours per day in addition to standard care for the first 72 hours from randomisation. After the initial period, use of APP is at discretion of the treating clinician. Awake prone can be discontinued earlier if patients meets pre-specified criteria of sustained improvement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Awake prone position (APP)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Awake prone position for 4 or more hours per day for the first 72 hours following randomisation.

Control group

Standard care excluding APP

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Awake prone position (APP)

Awake prone position for 4 or more hours per day for the first 72 hours following randomisation.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients admitted to intensive care unit for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
* Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is defined by respiratory rate ≥25 breaths/min, and partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤300 mm Hg or oxygen saturation (SpO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio \<235 while spontaneously breathing under standard oxygen with oxygen flow rate of at least 10 L/min, high flow oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation. For patients under standard oxygen, FiO2 is calculated according to the following formula: FiO2=0.21 + 0.03 per litre of supplemental oxygen.
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* impaired consciousness - Glasgow coma score \<14;
* inability to cooperate or prone position intolerance;
* immediate indications for endotracheal intubation;
* patients with do-not-intubate order at time of inclusion;
* patients with contraindication to high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV);
* Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) above 50 mm Hg and quantitative measure of the acidity (pH) \<7,3;
* vasopressor dose \>0.3 µg/kg/min of norepinephrine-equivalent to maintain systolic blood pressure \>90 mmHg;
* Covid-19 positive
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vilnius University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ieva Jovaisiene, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos

Mandeep K Phull, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

Tomas Jovaisa, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Republican Vilnius University Hospital

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status RECRUITING

Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Lithuania United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Tomas Jovaisa, Prof

Role: CONTACT

+37062697567

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Tomas Tamosuitis, Dr

Role: primary

+37068780950

Saulius Vosylius, Prof

Role: primary

Mandeep K Phull, Dr

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023/6-1517-981

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.