The Effect of Rebox Current in Pain Management

NCT ID: NCT05968274

Last Updated: 2024-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2024-11-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This post-marketing monocentric double-blind sham controlled crossover study will assess the efficacy of Rebox electrotherapy in the treatment of pain. Totally 72 patients will be treated with both real and sham Rebox device in a crossover design with a 1:1 ratio over a 6-week period. The degree of pain intensity reduction after the real Rebox stimulation will be evaluated in comparison with the sham stimulation. Moreover, differences in multidimensional aspects of pain will be compared between the real and sham stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Electric Stimulation Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm "A"

1. First stimulation period: real stimulation, total 8 sessions, session frequency: weekdays every other day (i.e. duration 2.5 weeks)
2. Washout period: no stimulation, duration: 1 week
3. Second stimulation period: sham stimulation, total 8 sessions, session frequency: weekdays every other day (i.e. duration 2.5 weeks)

Group Type OTHER

Rebox-Physio 4 (real stimulation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rebox-Physio 4 is a CE-certified medical device class IIa. The device is a voltage-controlled generator of specific DC electric pulses with voltage amplitude 0-21 V, current intensity up to 200 uA, rectangular pulse shape, pulse frequency 3000 Hz and pulse duration 0.25 ms. Rebox currents are applied locally at the site of pain non-invasively transcutaneously with a touch of a flexible pin active treatment electrode (cathode) while the patient holds a cylindrical electrode (anode) to close electric circuit. Stimulation time in one point is 3-5 seconds until the current intensity reaches stable target values of 140-160 uA. During one session, total 20-50 points are systematically treated at a mutual distance of approx. 2 cm over the target region.

Rebox-Physio 4 (sham stimulation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

In the sham stimulation, the comparator will be a visually identical sham version of the real Rebox-Physio 4.The sham device has a resistor installed at the output generating current of negligible intensity (maximum 1 uA) assuming no relevant physiological effect. The application procedure will be identical to the real device. When applied to the patient, the sham device displays "false" voltage and current intensity values and responds to the operator´s actions in real time mimicking the real stimulation. The operator is therefore blinded.

Arm "B"

1. First stimulation period: sham stimulation, total 8 sessions, weekdays every other day (i.e. 2.5 weeks)
2. Washout period: no stimulation, 1 week
3. Second stimulation period: real stimulation, total 8 sessions, weekdays every other day (i.e. 2.5 weeks)

Group Type OTHER

Rebox-Physio 4 (real stimulation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rebox-Physio 4 is a CE-certified medical device class IIa. The device is a voltage-controlled generator of specific DC electric pulses with voltage amplitude 0-21 V, current intensity up to 200 uA, rectangular pulse shape, pulse frequency 3000 Hz and pulse duration 0.25 ms. Rebox currents are applied locally at the site of pain non-invasively transcutaneously with a touch of a flexible pin active treatment electrode (cathode) while the patient holds a cylindrical electrode (anode) to close electric circuit. Stimulation time in one point is 3-5 seconds until the current intensity reaches stable target values of 140-160 uA. During one session, total 20-50 points are systematically treated at a mutual distance of approx. 2 cm over the target region.

Rebox-Physio 4 (sham stimulation)

Intervention Type DEVICE

In the sham stimulation, the comparator will be a visually identical sham version of the real Rebox-Physio 4.The sham device has a resistor installed at the output generating current of negligible intensity (maximum 1 uA) assuming no relevant physiological effect. The application procedure will be identical to the real device. When applied to the patient, the sham device displays "false" voltage and current intensity values and responds to the operator´s actions in real time mimicking the real stimulation. The operator is therefore blinded.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rebox-Physio 4 (real stimulation)

Rebox-Physio 4 is a CE-certified medical device class IIa. The device is a voltage-controlled generator of specific DC electric pulses with voltage amplitude 0-21 V, current intensity up to 200 uA, rectangular pulse shape, pulse frequency 3000 Hz and pulse duration 0.25 ms. Rebox currents are applied locally at the site of pain non-invasively transcutaneously with a touch of a flexible pin active treatment electrode (cathode) while the patient holds a cylindrical electrode (anode) to close electric circuit. Stimulation time in one point is 3-5 seconds until the current intensity reaches stable target values of 140-160 uA. During one session, total 20-50 points are systematically treated at a mutual distance of approx. 2 cm over the target region.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rebox-Physio 4 (sham stimulation)

In the sham stimulation, the comparator will be a visually identical sham version of the real Rebox-Physio 4.The sham device has a resistor installed at the output generating current of negligible intensity (maximum 1 uA) assuming no relevant physiological effect. The application procedure will be identical to the real device. When applied to the patient, the sham device displays "false" voltage and current intensity values and responds to the operator´s actions in real time mimicking the real stimulation. The operator is therefore blinded.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with pain based on the following diagnoses:

* Myofascial musculoskeletal pain
* Vertebrogenic algic syndrome in the cervical, thoracic and lumbosacral regions
* Sacroileitis with sacroiliac joint block
* Cervicocranialgia
* Frozen shoulder syndrome
* Arthrosis
* Epicondylitis
* Pain in tendons, ligaments and other enthesopathies
* Postoperative pain
* Post-traumatic pain
* Postherpetic neuralgia
* Duration of pain (de novo or exacerbation of chronic pain) prior to study inclusion ranges from 2 weeks to 3 months
* The average pain intensity in a given period of 2 weeks to 3 months prior to study inclusion must be NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) \>3
* The patient may be concurrently treated with analgesics and may be undergoing manual physiotherapy (rehabilitation)

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 years
* Local contraindications:

* Impaired skin integrity at the site of application (open wound, skin ulcer, burns), Note: the area around the postoperative scar is not an exclusion criterion
* Acute inflammation of the skin or subcutaneous tissue at the application site
* Deep vein thrombosis (diagnosed or suspected)
* General contraindications:

* Implanted electrical device (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, deep brain stimulator, cochlear implant, etc.)
* Pregnancy
* Epilepsy
* Malignant cancer (diagnosed or suspected)
* Acute potentially life-threatening conditions
* Concomitant other physical therapy (electrotherapy, magnetotherapy, laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, mechanotherapy, etc.)
* The Rebox device was administered to the subject for any indication in the last 12 months prior to the study inclusion date
* A recent change in analgesic medication (i.e., new agent or change in agent dose less than 1 week prior to the first stimulation session) or a planned change in analgesic medication during the course of the study (change in agent, change in dose), Note: modification of analgesic medication during the study is possible but must be recorded
* Ongoing acute infection, surgery or trauma during the study
* Concurrent subject participation in another clinical study
* Subject is unable to sign informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

F.D. Roosevelt University Hospital in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rebox Therapy s.r.o.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Igor Martuliak, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

F.D. Roosevelt University Hospital in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

F.D. Roosevelt University Hospital

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Slovakia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Low J, Reed A. Electrotherapy Explained, Principles and Practice, 3rd Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann. 2000; 121-122.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Johannsen F, Gam A, Hauschild B, Mathiesen B, Jensen L. Rebox: an adjunct in physical medicine? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;74(4):438-40.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8466428 (View on PubMed)

Trudel D, Duley J, Zastrow I, Kerr EW, Davidson R, MacDermid JC. Rehabilitation for patients with lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2004 Apr-Jun;17(2):243-66. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15162109 (View on PubMed)

Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983 Oct;17(2):197-210. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90143-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6646795 (View on PubMed)

Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18487245 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.