Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-01
2024-11-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Regeneration of Acutely Injured Nerves With Temporary Electrical Stimulation
NCT05721261
Effectiveness of of Therapeutic Currents in Clinical Dimension and Penetration Depth Dimension in Lower Back
NCT02384785
Randomized Blinded Evaluation of the Effects of TENS and IFC Compared to a Sham Device and SOC in Patients With Non-Specific CLBP
NCT05972889
Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation for Gluteus Muscle Dysfunction After Low Back Pain Episode
NCT06873386
Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields for Post-Amputation Pain
NCT05392803
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm "A"
1. First stimulation period: real stimulation, total 8 sessions, session frequency: weekdays every other day (i.e. duration 2.5 weeks)
2. Washout period: no stimulation, duration: 1 week
3. Second stimulation period: sham stimulation, total 8 sessions, session frequency: weekdays every other day (i.e. duration 2.5 weeks)
Rebox-Physio 4 (real stimulation)
Rebox-Physio 4 is a CE-certified medical device class IIa. The device is a voltage-controlled generator of specific DC electric pulses with voltage amplitude 0-21 V, current intensity up to 200 uA, rectangular pulse shape, pulse frequency 3000 Hz and pulse duration 0.25 ms. Rebox currents are applied locally at the site of pain non-invasively transcutaneously with a touch of a flexible pin active treatment electrode (cathode) while the patient holds a cylindrical electrode (anode) to close electric circuit. Stimulation time in one point is 3-5 seconds until the current intensity reaches stable target values of 140-160 uA. During one session, total 20-50 points are systematically treated at a mutual distance of approx. 2 cm over the target region.
Rebox-Physio 4 (sham stimulation)
In the sham stimulation, the comparator will be a visually identical sham version of the real Rebox-Physio 4.The sham device has a resistor installed at the output generating current of negligible intensity (maximum 1 uA) assuming no relevant physiological effect. The application procedure will be identical to the real device. When applied to the patient, the sham device displays "false" voltage and current intensity values and responds to the operator´s actions in real time mimicking the real stimulation. The operator is therefore blinded.
Arm "B"
1. First stimulation period: sham stimulation, total 8 sessions, weekdays every other day (i.e. 2.5 weeks)
2. Washout period: no stimulation, 1 week
3. Second stimulation period: real stimulation, total 8 sessions, weekdays every other day (i.e. 2.5 weeks)
Rebox-Physio 4 (real stimulation)
Rebox-Physio 4 is a CE-certified medical device class IIa. The device is a voltage-controlled generator of specific DC electric pulses with voltage amplitude 0-21 V, current intensity up to 200 uA, rectangular pulse shape, pulse frequency 3000 Hz and pulse duration 0.25 ms. Rebox currents are applied locally at the site of pain non-invasively transcutaneously with a touch of a flexible pin active treatment electrode (cathode) while the patient holds a cylindrical electrode (anode) to close electric circuit. Stimulation time in one point is 3-5 seconds until the current intensity reaches stable target values of 140-160 uA. During one session, total 20-50 points are systematically treated at a mutual distance of approx. 2 cm over the target region.
Rebox-Physio 4 (sham stimulation)
In the sham stimulation, the comparator will be a visually identical sham version of the real Rebox-Physio 4.The sham device has a resistor installed at the output generating current of negligible intensity (maximum 1 uA) assuming no relevant physiological effect. The application procedure will be identical to the real device. When applied to the patient, the sham device displays "false" voltage and current intensity values and responds to the operator´s actions in real time mimicking the real stimulation. The operator is therefore blinded.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rebox-Physio 4 (real stimulation)
Rebox-Physio 4 is a CE-certified medical device class IIa. The device is a voltage-controlled generator of specific DC electric pulses with voltage amplitude 0-21 V, current intensity up to 200 uA, rectangular pulse shape, pulse frequency 3000 Hz and pulse duration 0.25 ms. Rebox currents are applied locally at the site of pain non-invasively transcutaneously with a touch of a flexible pin active treatment electrode (cathode) while the patient holds a cylindrical electrode (anode) to close electric circuit. Stimulation time in one point is 3-5 seconds until the current intensity reaches stable target values of 140-160 uA. During one session, total 20-50 points are systematically treated at a mutual distance of approx. 2 cm over the target region.
Rebox-Physio 4 (sham stimulation)
In the sham stimulation, the comparator will be a visually identical sham version of the real Rebox-Physio 4.The sham device has a resistor installed at the output generating current of negligible intensity (maximum 1 uA) assuming no relevant physiological effect. The application procedure will be identical to the real device. When applied to the patient, the sham device displays "false" voltage and current intensity values and responds to the operator´s actions in real time mimicking the real stimulation. The operator is therefore blinded.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Myofascial musculoskeletal pain
* Vertebrogenic algic syndrome in the cervical, thoracic and lumbosacral regions
* Sacroileitis with sacroiliac joint block
* Cervicocranialgia
* Frozen shoulder syndrome
* Arthrosis
* Epicondylitis
* Pain in tendons, ligaments and other enthesopathies
* Postoperative pain
* Post-traumatic pain
* Postherpetic neuralgia
* Duration of pain (de novo or exacerbation of chronic pain) prior to study inclusion ranges from 2 weeks to 3 months
* The average pain intensity in a given period of 2 weeks to 3 months prior to study inclusion must be NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) \>3
* The patient may be concurrently treated with analgesics and may be undergoing manual physiotherapy (rehabilitation)
Exclusion Criteria
* Local contraindications:
* Impaired skin integrity at the site of application (open wound, skin ulcer, burns), Note: the area around the postoperative scar is not an exclusion criterion
* Acute inflammation of the skin or subcutaneous tissue at the application site
* Deep vein thrombosis (diagnosed or suspected)
* General contraindications:
* Implanted electrical device (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, deep brain stimulator, cochlear implant, etc.)
* Pregnancy
* Epilepsy
* Malignant cancer (diagnosed or suspected)
* Acute potentially life-threatening conditions
* Concomitant other physical therapy (electrotherapy, magnetotherapy, laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, mechanotherapy, etc.)
* The Rebox device was administered to the subject for any indication in the last 12 months prior to the study inclusion date
* A recent change in analgesic medication (i.e., new agent or change in agent dose less than 1 week prior to the first stimulation session) or a planned change in analgesic medication during the course of the study (change in agent, change in dose), Note: modification of analgesic medication during the study is possible but must be recorded
* Ongoing acute infection, surgery or trauma during the study
* Concurrent subject participation in another clinical study
* Subject is unable to sign informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
F.D. Roosevelt University Hospital in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
UNKNOWN
Rebox Therapy s.r.o.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Igor Martuliak, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
F.D. Roosevelt University Hospital in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
F.D. Roosevelt University Hospital
Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Low J, Reed A. Electrotherapy Explained, Principles and Practice, 3rd Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann. 2000; 121-122.
Johannsen F, Gam A, Hauschild B, Mathiesen B, Jensen L. Rebox: an adjunct in physical medicine? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;74(4):438-40.
Trudel D, Duley J, Zastrow I, Kerr EW, Davidson R, MacDermid JC. Rehabilitation for patients with lateral epicondylitis: a systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2004 Apr-Jun;17(2):243-66. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.011.
Daut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983 Oct;17(2):197-210. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90143-4.
Breivik H, Borchgrevink PC, Allen SM, Rosseland LA, Romundstad L, Hals EK, Kvarstein G, Stubhaug A. Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jul;101(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen103. Epub 2008 May 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.