Comparison of Two Modes of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Chronic Neuropathic Radiculalgia

NCT ID: NCT04169477

Last Updated: 2023-01-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-08

Study Completion Date

2022-10-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare 2 types of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to treat chronic neuropathic pain. TENS involves the application of electrical stimulation to the skin via surface electrodes to stimulate nerve fibres for pain relief.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

TENS is already recommended in clinical practice to treat chronic neuropathic pain. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of 2 different modes of TENS: conventional TENS (c-TENS) and mixed-frequency TENS (m-TENS). Randomization will determine the mode that the patient has to test during the first month.

Each patient will test successively each mode during 1 month at home (3 sessions 1 hour/day). Then, the patient will test the other mode during the second month. Up to 6 months, the patient will be free to use the mode of TENS he wants.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain Radiculopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cTENS-mTENS

Patients randomized in this arm will test cTENS mode first, the subjects will be crossed over to the mTENS form

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CEFAR Primo Pro (TENS device)

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the first month: Patients will have to test 3 sessions of TENS 1 hour/day. Depending on their arm assigned by randomization, patients will begin with c-TENS or m-TENS.

\[Cross-over\] During the second month: Patients will test the other type they do not have used yet according to the following scheme: 3 sessions of 1 hour, each day.

In this way, all patients will test successively the 2 different modes. After the end of the second month and up to the end of their participation (6 months after randomization) patients will be free to use the mode of TENS they prefer.

mTENS-cTENS

Patients randomized in this arm will test mTENS mode first, the subjects will be cross over to the cTENS mode

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CEFAR Primo Pro (TENS device)

Intervention Type DEVICE

During the first month: Patients will have to test 3 sessions of TENS 1 hour/day. Depending on their arm assigned by randomization, patients will begin with c-TENS or m-TENS.

\[Cross-over\] During the second month: Patients will test the other type they do not have used yet according to the following scheme: 3 sessions of 1 hour, each day.

In this way, all patients will test successively the 2 different modes. After the end of the second month and up to the end of their participation (6 months after randomization) patients will be free to use the mode of TENS they prefer.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CEFAR Primo Pro (TENS device)

During the first month: Patients will have to test 3 sessions of TENS 1 hour/day. Depending on their arm assigned by randomization, patients will begin with c-TENS or m-TENS.

\[Cross-over\] During the second month: Patients will test the other type they do not have used yet according to the following scheme: 3 sessions of 1 hour, each day.

In this way, all patients will test successively the 2 different modes. After the end of the second month and up to the end of their participation (6 months after randomization) patients will be free to use the mode of TENS they prefer.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 years old or older
* Patients with chronic neuropathic radiculalgia from at least 3 months of evolution
* Radiculalgia VAS \> or egal to 40/100
* Neuropathic pain diagnostic (DN4) score \> or egal to 4
* Patient who has accepted to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Dermatosis in the painful dermatome
* Venous or arterial thrombosis of the lower limbs
* Patient with active implantable medical device
* Severe cognitive disorders
* Patient under a legal protection regime(guardianship/curatorship/guardianship of justice)
* Previous use of TENS to treat radiculalgia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Lille Catholic University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vincent Ducoulombier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

GHICL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CH Béthune

Béthune, , France

Site Status

CHU Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

GHICL

Lomme, , France

Site Status

CH Roubaix

Roubaix, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-A03074-51 ID RCB

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RC-P0080

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Electrolysis in Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT06661070 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA