Comparison of Two Modes of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Chronic Neuropathic Radiculalgia
NCT ID: NCT04169477
Last Updated: 2023-01-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-08
2022-10-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Chronic Pain of Predominantly Peripheral Neuropathic Origin
NCT00716326
Direct Current Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT05442021
Effectiveness of NMP and TDCS vs Pharmacological Treatment in Cancer Patients With Lower Limb Pain
NCT06240377
Regeneration of Acutely Injured Nerves With Temporary Electrical Stimulation
NCT05721261
A Study to Confirm the Safety of High Frequency DRG Stimulator in Patients With Chronic Lower Limb Pain
NCT03285113
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Each patient will test successively each mode during 1 month at home (3 sessions 1 hour/day). Then, the patient will test the other mode during the second month. Up to 6 months, the patient will be free to use the mode of TENS he wants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
cTENS-mTENS
Patients randomized in this arm will test cTENS mode first, the subjects will be crossed over to the mTENS form
CEFAR Primo Pro (TENS device)
During the first month: Patients will have to test 3 sessions of TENS 1 hour/day. Depending on their arm assigned by randomization, patients will begin with c-TENS or m-TENS.
\[Cross-over\] During the second month: Patients will test the other type they do not have used yet according to the following scheme: 3 sessions of 1 hour, each day.
In this way, all patients will test successively the 2 different modes. After the end of the second month and up to the end of their participation (6 months after randomization) patients will be free to use the mode of TENS they prefer.
mTENS-cTENS
Patients randomized in this arm will test mTENS mode first, the subjects will be cross over to the cTENS mode
CEFAR Primo Pro (TENS device)
During the first month: Patients will have to test 3 sessions of TENS 1 hour/day. Depending on their arm assigned by randomization, patients will begin with c-TENS or m-TENS.
\[Cross-over\] During the second month: Patients will test the other type they do not have used yet according to the following scheme: 3 sessions of 1 hour, each day.
In this way, all patients will test successively the 2 different modes. After the end of the second month and up to the end of their participation (6 months after randomization) patients will be free to use the mode of TENS they prefer.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CEFAR Primo Pro (TENS device)
During the first month: Patients will have to test 3 sessions of TENS 1 hour/day. Depending on their arm assigned by randomization, patients will begin with c-TENS or m-TENS.
\[Cross-over\] During the second month: Patients will test the other type they do not have used yet according to the following scheme: 3 sessions of 1 hour, each day.
In this way, all patients will test successively the 2 different modes. After the end of the second month and up to the end of their participation (6 months after randomization) patients will be free to use the mode of TENS they prefer.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with chronic neuropathic radiculalgia from at least 3 months of evolution
* Radiculalgia VAS \> or egal to 40/100
* Neuropathic pain diagnostic (DN4) score \> or egal to 4
* Patient who has accepted to participate in the study by signing the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Dermatosis in the painful dermatome
* Venous or arterial thrombosis of the lower limbs
* Patient with active implantable medical device
* Severe cognitive disorders
* Patient under a legal protection regime(guardianship/curatorship/guardianship of justice)
* Previous use of TENS to treat radiculalgia
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lille Catholic University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vincent Ducoulombier, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
GHICL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CH Béthune
Béthune, , France
CHU Lille
Lille, , France
GHICL
Lomme, , France
CH Roubaix
Roubaix, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-A03074-51 ID RCB
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RC-P0080
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.