BioWave High-frequency Neurostimulation Versus TENS for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT05511181
Last Updated: 2023-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-15
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-Invasive Targeted Electronic Pain Control Device ("Biowave System") Versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for the Symptomatic Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT00277797
Randomized Blinded Evaluation of the Effects of TENS and IFC Compared to a Sham Device and SOC in Patients With Non-Specific CLBP
NCT05972889
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation With Frequency Specific Microcurrent Resonance Therapy for Non Specific Chronic Low Back Pain Patents: a Prospective Double Blinded, Randomized, Placebo Control Trial
NCT04617197
Bi-Axial Rotating Magnetic Field Therapy in Refractory Neuropathic Foot Pain Secondary to Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT00123136
High Tone Power Therapy on Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Patients
NCT07305792
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BioWave
BioWaveGO is a FDA 510(k) cleared high frequency neurostimulator. Patients that are first randomized to the BioWave arm will receive a 30 minute treatment in the clinic with a BioWaveGO device followed by a 30 minute washout and ending with a final 30 minute treatment. Data will be collected before, and after the final treatment. Patients will then be instructed to take the BioWaveGO device home and perform two 30 minute treatment sessions daily at home for 2 weeks. Follow-up in the clinic will be after the 2-week treatment period and the patients will be assessed in clinic for physiologic measures of pain response. A washout period of 2 weeks will follow, the patients will return to the clinic at week 4 and the patients will crossover to receive the TENS treatment (as described in the TENS arm).
BioWave
The BioWave device is called BioWaveGO. It is a FDA 510(k) cleared high frequency sinusoidal neurostimulator
TENS
Patients that are first randomized to the TENS arm will receive a 30 minute treatment in the clinic with an Intensity 5000 TENS device followed by a 30 minute washout and ending with a final 30 minute treatment. Data will be collected before, and after the final treatment. Patients will then be instructed to take the TENS device home and perform two 30 minute treatment sessions daily at home for 2 weeks. Follow-up in the clinic will be after the 2-week treatment period and the patients will be assessed in clinic for physiologic measures of pain response. A washout period of 2 weeks will follow, the patients will return to the clinic at week 4 and the patients will crossover to receive the BioWaveGO treatment (as described in the BioWave arm).
TENS
The TENS device is called Intensity 5000. It is a FDA 510(k) cleared TENS device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BioWave
The BioWave device is called BioWaveGO. It is a FDA 510(k) cleared high frequency sinusoidal neurostimulator
TENS
The TENS device is called Intensity 5000. It is a FDA 510(k) cleared TENS device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subject must have a body weight of 45 kg or more and a body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m2 or less.
* Subject must be aged 18-85 on the date of enrollment and subjects consecutively enrolled
* Subject must have a qualifying baseline pain score of≥5
* Subject must have a stable pain medication regimen for a period of at least 2 weeks prior to study enrollment. Both medication dosages and total number of medications must be stable prior to initiation.
* Subject's pain indication must be defined as chronic low back pain
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject is currently receiving chronic opioid therapy defined as \>30 morphine equivalents units per day (daily use for \>2 weeks)
* Subject has an implanted spinal cord stimulator (SCS).
* Subject has any clinically significant clinical, physical, laboratory, or radiographic finding at Screening that, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates study participation.
* Subject is currently pregnant.
* Subject has history of or current medical, surgical, post surgical, or psychiatric condition that would confound interpretation of safety, tolerability, or efficacy, (eg, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension, hemodynamic instability, or respiratory insufficiency, cancer or palliative care).
* Subject received an experimental drug or used an experimental medical device within 30 days prior to Screening or has previously participated in this trial.
* Subject is unable to comply with the requirements of the study
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Center For Interventional Pain and Spine
OTHER
Yale University
OTHER
University of Wisconsin, Madison
OTHER
BioWave Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Fishman, MD
Director of Research
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Fishman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Center For Interventional Pain and Spine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yale
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Carolinas Pain Center
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States
Center for Interventional Pain and Spine
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):197-209. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.13.
Hegarty DA, Bretherton B. An Open-Label Pilot Study Investigating Noninvasive High-Frequency Peripheral Nerve Fiber Stimulation in Chronic Pain. Pain Pract. 2021 Jun;21(5):578-587. doi: 10.1111/papr.12993. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
S.Diwan, R. F. Eliazo, H. C. Hemmings, S. Panchal: Symptomatic Treatment Of Chronic Low Back Pain: Determination Of Optimal Signal Frequency And Preliminary Efficacy Of A Targeted Non-Invasive Electronic Pain Control Device. Journal of the International Anesthesia Research Society, ANESTH ANALG ABSTRACTS 2003; 96; S-1-S-293
Kang RW, Lewis PB, Kramer A, Hayden JK, Cole BJ. Prospective randomized single-blinded controlled clinical trial of percutaneous neuromodulation pain therapy device versus sham for the osteoarthritic knee: a pilot study. Orthopedics. 2007 Jun;30(6):439-45. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20070601-11. No abstract available.
Wanich T, Gelber J, Rodeo S, Windsor R: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study To Determine Safety and Efficacy In Terms Of Pain Reduction, Increased Range Of Motion, And Reduced Pain Medications, For A Novel Percutaneous Neuromodulation Pain Therapy Device ("Biowave P ENS ®") Following Post - Operative Treatments For Total Knee Replacement Procedures. Poster Presentation American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons February 2009
Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, Wells GA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD003008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003008.pub3.
Radhakrishnan R, Sluka KA. Deep tissue afferents, but not cutaneous afferents, mediate transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-Induced antihyperalgesia. J Pain. 2005 Oct;6(10):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.06.001.
Levin MF, Hui-Chan CW. Conventional and acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation excite similar afferent fibers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jan;74(1):54-60.
Hughes N, Bennett MI, Johnson MI. An investigation into the magnitude of the current window and perception of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) sensation at various frequencies and body sites in healthy human participants. Clin J Pain. 2013 Feb;29(2):146-53. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182579919.
DeSantana JM, Da Silva LF, De Resende MA, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at both high and low frequencies activates ventrolateral periaqueductal grey to decrease mechanical hyperalgesia in arthritic rats. Neuroscience. 2009 Nov 10;163(4):1233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.06.056. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Vance CGT, Liebano RE, Amrit AS, Bush HM, Lee KS, Lee JE, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain, fatigue and hyperalgesia while restoring central inhibition in primary fibromyalgia. Pain. 2013 Nov;154(11):2554-2562. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.043. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
Hurlow A, Bennett MI, Robb KA, Johnson MI, Simpson KH, Oxberry SG. Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) for cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD006276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006276.pub3.
Kroeling P, Gross AR, Goldsmith CH; Cervical Overview Group. A Cochrane review of electrotherapy for mechanical neck disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Nov 1;30(21):E641-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000184302.34509.48.
Johnson MI, Mulvey MR, Bagnall AM. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for phantom pain and stump pain following amputation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 18;8(8):CD007264. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007264.pub3.
Nnoaham KE, Kumbang J. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD003222. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003222.pub2.
Rutjes AW, Nuesch E, Sterchi R, Kalichman L, Hendriks E, Osiri M, Brosseau L, Reichenbach S, Juni P. Transcutaneous electrostimulation for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;2009(4):CD002823. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002823.pub2.
Walsh DM, Howe TE, Johnson MI, Sluka KA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;(2):CD006142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006142.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BIOWAVEVSTENSLBP1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.