Comparison Between Abduction External Rotation Brace and Arm Sling After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff

NCT ID: NCT05948995

Last Updated: 2025-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-01

Study Completion Date

2023-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Comparison between Abduction External Rotation Brace and Arm Sling after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff : A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of primary outcome : range of motion (at pre-operative , post-operative) , pain score , shoulder functional score

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Comparison between Abduction External Rotation Brace and Arm Sling after Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff : A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of primary outcome : range of motion (at pre-operative , post-operative) , pain score , shoulder functional score There are gaps of knowledge which sling/brace are the best for post operative arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Because patient who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have to wear these sling/brace for at least 1 month after operation , the better one could reduce post-operative shoulder stiffness , decrease pain and improve functional shoulder score

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

The participants were randomly divided into two groups. The control group received arm sling post operative arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The experimental group received abduction external rotation brace post operative arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
On the follow up date , both groups will be removed sling / brace before receiving by outcome assessor

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional arm sling

Conventional arm sling Arm position : Internal rotation , Adduction

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Abduction external rotational brace

Abduction external rotational brace Arm position : Abduction , External rotation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Abduction external rotation brace

Intervention Type DEVICE

Abduction external rotation brace Arm position : Abduction , External rotation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Abduction external rotation brace

Abduction external rotation brace Arm position : Abduction , External rotation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Arm sling with abduction pillow

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with full thickness rotator cuff tear
* Plan for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Exclusion Criteria

* Revision cuff surgery
* Unable to answer question
* Previous shoulder surgery
* Full thickness subscapularis tear
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chuenrutai Yeekian, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

QSMVH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital

Chon Buri, Si Racha, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

022/2566

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Superior Capsule vs Bridging Study
NCT04965103 COMPLETED NA