Clinical and Procedural Outcomes of Ostial Left Anterior Descending Artery Intervention With or Without Crossover to Left-main

NCT ID: NCT05933473

Last Updated: 2023-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-31

Study Completion Date

2025-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective interventional study evaluating clinical and procedural outcomes of patients with ostial left anterior descending artery lesion PCI alone or crossover with left main artery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim of the work:

1. Evaluate the clinical and procedural outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention (PCI) for ostial left anterior descending (LAD) lesions while comparing the outcomes between those treated with a stent crossing over (CO) to the left main (LM) versus ostial stenting (OS) alone.
2. Define predictors of success in Ostial LAD lesion PCI.

Patients and methods:

1)Patients:

Inclusion criteria:

1. Patients with Significant ostial LAD \>50% stenosis within 5mm from ostium
2. Either chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) (ongoing symptoms despite medical therapy) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.
3. De-novo lesions.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Those with coronary angiography results such as: (significant disease of the LM more than 40% or ostial left circumflex (LCX) greater than 50%).
2. Patients with protected LM.
3. In adherence to a dual antiplatelet regimen by enrolled patients within the first 12 months after the procedure.

Methods:

It is prospective cohort study on patients in Assiut university heart hospital catheterization lab. with ostial LAD lesion (median, 0.1.0) that will include baseline demographic, clinical, and angiographic data.

All patients will be thoroughly informed about the procedure's possible risks and benefits, as well as alternative therapeutic choices prior to the intervention, and obtained signed consent from all participants.

In all cases, percutaneous coronary interventions and stenting will be performed according to standard techniques either trans-radial or transfemoral approach.

All patients pre-treated with dual antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin and loading dose of either clopidogrel or ticagrelor.

Unfractionated heparin will be given to all patients during the procedure with a target activated clotting time of \>250 seconds.

Two main strategies for treating ostial LAD lesions will be used and analyzed in this study:

1. Crossover stenting (CO) from the LM into the LAD, using standard provisional bifurcation techniques and proximal stent optimization (POT), where post dilatation was typically performed.
2. Ostial stenting of the LAD (OS) with no crossover back to the LM. The choice of the technique and the use of intravascular imaging (IVUS) depends on the discretion of the treating interventional cardiologist.

* Patients included in our study will be subjected to:

1. Detailed History.
2. General and complete cardiac examination.
3. 12-Leads ECG.
4. Detailed Echocardiography. \\ 5)Coronary angiography findings including:

A. Quantitative angiographic measurements:

1. Reference diameter (mm).
2. Diameter stenosis (%).
3. Lesion length and distance from LAD ostium(mm).
4. Medina classification.
5. Bifurcation angle.

B. Techniques used:

1. Ostial LAD stenting.
2. Crossover with LM. C. IVUS or angiography guided PCI.

Basic IVUS Measurement

The following basic measurements may be made with IVUS:

1. Minimum lumen diameter (MLD): the shortest diameter via lumen's center.
2. Minimum lumen area (MLA): the smallest area via the lumen's center.
3. Stenosis area: (reference lumen area - stenosis lumen area)/reference lumen area.
4. Plaque burden: (EEM area - lumen area) / EEM area .

D. Contrast volume (ml) E. Fluoroscopy time (min.) Data will be gathered during hospital admission and follow-up. In-hospital mortality and morbidity will be documented.

Follow up:

During the hospital admission:

Both techniques used by our operators in these cases will be overviewed and evaluated as regarding:

1. Angiographic success in target vessel defined as (residual stenosis ≤ 30% and TIMI flow grade 3) and side branch (SB) angiographic success (residual stenosis ≤ 50% and TIMI flow grade 3).
2. Procedural Success A successful PCI should achieve angiographic success without in-hospital major clinical complications (e.g., cardiac death, target vessel related MI, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery) during hospitalization
3. Clinical Success in the short term, a clinically successful PCI includes anatomic and procedural success with relief of signs and/or symptoms of myocardial ischemia after the patient recovers from the procedure.

Information about the in-hospital outcome will be obtained from an electronic clinical database for patients maintained at our institution and by review of hospital records for those discharged to referring hospitals.

Short term follow up (after 6 months):

1. Per our institutional protocol, clinical follow-up will be performed by physicians in outpatient clinic after 4 months.
2. Control coronary angiography will be scheduled at 6 months to all cases.
3. Information on the occurrence of cardiac death, target vessel related myocardial infarction or repeated revascularization during period of follow-up will be collected by consulting our institutional electronic database and by contacting referring physicians and institutions and all living patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

LM-LAD (Crossover stenting (CO))

Crossover stenting (CO) from the LM into the LAD, using standard provisional bifurcation techniques and proximal stent optimization (POT), where post dilatation was typically performed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

percutaneous intervention to oseal LAD with or without LM stenting

ostial LAD (Ostial stenting(OS))

Ostial stenting of the LAD (OS) with no cross-over back to the LM.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous coronary intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

percutaneous intervention to oseal LAD with or without LM stenting

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous coronary intervention

percutaneous intervention to oseal LAD with or without LM stenting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients with Significant ostial LAD \>50% stenosis within 5mm from ostium
2. Either CCS (ongoing symptoms despite medical therapy) or ACS patients.
3. De-novo lesions.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Those with coronary angiography results such as: (significant disease of the LM more than 40% or ostial LCX greater than 50%).
2. Patients with protected LM.
3. In adherence to a dual antiplatelet regimen by enrolled patients within the first 12 months after the procedure.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

MA Abdelreheem

Assistant lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed AN AbdEl-Reheem, MSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mohamed AN AbdEl-Reheem, MSC

Role: CONTACT

01119535430

Aly M Tohamy, MD

Role: CONTACT

01006258877

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A, Mehran R, Stone GW, Spertus J, Onuma Y, Morel MA, van Es GA, Zuckerman B, Fearon WF, Taggart D, Kappetein AP, Krucoff MW, Vranckx P, Windecker S, Cutlip D, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Standardized End Point Definitions for Coronary Intervention Trials: The Academic Research Consortium-2 Consensus Document. Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2635-2650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029289.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29891620 (View on PubMed)

Rigatelli G, Zuin M, Baracca E, Galasso P, Carraro M, Mazza A, Lanza D, Roncon L, Daggubati R. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Ostial Left Anterior Descending Disease Treatment: Ostial Stenting Versus Left Main Cross-Over Stenting. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Dec;20(12):1058-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30797760 (View on PubMed)

Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Dec;22(7):2033-54. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8245363 (View on PubMed)

Frangos C, Noble S, Piazza N, Asgar A, Fortier A, Ly QH, Bonan R. Impact of bifurcation lesions on angiographic characteristics and procedural success in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Apr;104(4):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21624790 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Coronary interventions

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Kitasato PCI Registry
NCT05308329 UNKNOWN
PCI vs. CABG in UPLM-ISR
NCT04968977 COMPLETED