Simple Crossover Versus Side Branch Opening in Patients With Non-Left Main Bifurcation Lesion
NCT ID: NCT05705362
Last Updated: 2023-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
1000 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-03-01
2029-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Simple crossover strategy would be non-inferior to SB opening strategy in the risk of target lesion failure (TLF) in patients with angiographically compromised SB (visually SB stenosis ≥50%) after provisional MV stenting for non-left main bifurcation lesion.
A total of 1000 patients (500 per each group) with the angiographically compromised SB (visually SB stenosis ≥50%) after provisional MV stenting for non-left main bifurcation lesion will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized to either the simple crossover strategy group or SB opening strategy group at the time of enrollment with 1:1 ratio. Stratified randomization according to participating center, clinical presentation (acute coronary syndrome or stable ischemic heart disease), and type of bifurcation lesions (true or non-true) will be performed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mechanism and Predictor of Side Branch Jailing
NCT00553670
Optimal Strategy for Side Branch Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesion
NCT00794014
Keep bIfurcation Single Stenting Simple
NCT04285372
Choice Of Optimal Strategy For Bifurcation Lesions With Normal Side Branch
NCT00694005
Clinical and Procedural Outcomes of Ostial Left Anterior Descending Artery Intervention With or Without Crossover to Left-main
NCT05933473
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
On this background, this trial aims to compare the clinical outcomes between simple crossover and side branch opening strategies in patients with the angiographically compromised SB (visually SB stenosis ≥50%) after provisional MV stenting for non-left main bifurcation lesion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Simple crossover arm
This arm will receive the main vessel stenting only (with proximal optimization technique).
Simple Crossover
Regardless of allocated arms, stent implantation in the MV (selected 1:1 according to the distal MV size) followed by systematic proximal optimization technique (POT, post-dilatation of the stent at the level of proximal MV with a balloon diameter sized 1:1 according to the proximal MV) or POT like procedure is strongly recommended.
Side branch opening arm
This arm will receive a side branch opening procedure after the main vessel stenting.
Side branch opening
According to the latest European Bifurcation Club (EBC) consensus document, distal SB rewiring followed by kissing balloon inflation (eventually conducted with short non-compliant balloons) and repeat POT procedures are highly recommended. An additional stent will be allowed if major dissection or decreased TIMI flow of SB occurs during SB treatment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Simple Crossover
Regardless of allocated arms, stent implantation in the MV (selected 1:1 according to the distal MV size) followed by systematic proximal optimization technique (POT, post-dilatation of the stent at the level of proximal MV with a balloon diameter sized 1:1 according to the proximal MV) or POT like procedure is strongly recommended.
Side branch opening
According to the latest European Bifurcation Club (EBC) consensus document, distal SB rewiring followed by kissing balloon inflation (eventually conducted with short non-compliant balloons) and repeat POT procedures are highly recommended. An additional stent will be allowed if major dissection or decreased TIMI flow of SB occurs during SB treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* (2) Patients with non-left main bifurcation lesion (SB diameter ≥2.3 mm)
* (3) Target lesions amenable for 1-stenting with provisional SB approach by operators' decision
* (4) Angiographically compromised SB (visual SB stenosis ≥50%) after provisional MV stenting
Exclusion Criteria
* (2) Patients who inevitably require SB intervention after MV stenting, as follows. (Observation Group 2)\*
1. Reduced SB TIMI flow (≤2) after MV stenting
2. SB dissection after MV stenting (≥ Type C)
* (3) Patients without SB compromise after MV stenting (visually SB stenosis \<50%) (Observation Group 3)\*
* (4) Cardiogenic shock (Killip class IV) at presentation
* (5) Patients with significant valvular heart disease or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction \<35%)
* (6) Pregnancy or breast feeding
* (7) Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment)
* (8) Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
NAM, Chang-Wook
Professor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CROSS-COBIS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.