ANGiographic Evaluation of Left Main Coronary Artery INtErvention

NCT ID: NCT04604197

Last Updated: 2026-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-16

Study Completion Date

2026-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess if an angiographic follow-up at 6 months after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease decrease the composite objective of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke at 36 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents in left main (LM) disease has demonstrated similar results than surgical revascularization in patients with SYNTAX score \< 33, being the main drawback of PCI a higher rate of new revascularization. A small study found a reduction in the composite end-point of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and urgent revascularization with a routine angiographic follow-up. The investigators have designed a prospective, randomized, controlled, two-arm multicenter study in patients aged 18-85 with LM disease and SYNTAX score \<33 and in cases ≥ 33 based on the Heart Team decision to assess the benefit of a routine angiographic follow-up 6 months after LM stenting. After the index procedure and before hospital discharge the patient will be randomized to routine invasive angiographic follow-up at 6 months plus clinical follow-up at 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years vs. the control arm, which would be followed clinically at 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years. Based on our calculations, an adequately powered trial would require 1009 patients per arm but due to the uncertainty of the results and the current economical restrictions we have designed a pilot study in 400 patients to find out the convenience of an adequately powered trial. All the lesions should be treated with an everolimus eluting stent with permanent fluoropolymer. It will be desirable to achieve complete revascularization and it will be highly recommended to perform the procedures guided with an intravascular image technique (OCT or IVUS (IntraVascular UltraSound) according to operator´s criteria). The main outcome will be death, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident at 3 years. The initial percutaneous technique and the decision about the convenience and way of revascularization in case of restenosis in the follow-up will be left at the operator´s discretion, according in the most adequate way to the current guidelines. Nonetheless, the investigators are strongly encouraged to rely on intravascular techniques, based on either imaging or physiology. In those cases with in-stent hyperplasia with doubts about possible restenosis, FFR and RFR (Resting full-cycle ratio) will be performed, with low threshold to achieve a high rate of ruling out the restenosis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Occlusion Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Artery Stenosis Coronary Disease Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Angiography and Clinical Follow up

After PCI. The patient is randomized to an angiographic follow-up at 6 months and a Clinical Follow to 36 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Angiography and Clinical Follow up

Intervention Type OTHER

Angiography and Clinical Follow up

Clinical Follow up

After PCI. The patient is randomized to a Clinical Follow to 36 months

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Clinical Follow up

Intervention Type OTHER

Clinical Follow up

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Angiography and Clinical Follow up

Angiography and Clinical Follow up

Intervention Type OTHER

Clinical Follow up

Clinical Follow up

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: 18- 85 years at the date of the PCI.
* With PCI for presenting de novo lesions in the Left Main Artery by implanting a cobalt-chrome stent with everolimus-eluting fluoropolymer.
* Informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate in the study.
* Patients with left main disease who have been admitted with STEMI and have undergone primary angioplasty in a culprit lesion different than the left main. The left main lesion has been treated as a stage procedure and discharged with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35 %.
* Previous coronary surgery.
* Creatinine clearance \<40 ml / min.
* Contraindication for double antiaggregation after PCI.
* Patients life expectancy \<36 months.
* Included in other studies or clinical trials.
* Pregnant or lactating women.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundación EPIC

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol

Badalona, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Cruces

Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Donostia

Donostia / San Sebastian, Gipuzkoa, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Regional de Malaga

Málaga, Malaga, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo

Galdakao, Vizcaya, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de A Coruña

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario de Albacete

Albacete, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario de Alicante

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario San Juan de Alicante

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Del Mar

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitari Bellvitge

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Ciudad Real

Ciudad Real, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes

Gijón, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves

Granada, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Juan Ramón Jiménez

Huelva, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de León

León, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Lucus Agusti

Lugo, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La Princesa

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La Paz

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen Arrixaca

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid

Valladolid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cavalcante R, Sotomi Y, Lee CW, Ahn JM, Farooq V, Tateishi H, Tenekecioglu E, Zeng Y, Suwannasom P, Collet C, Albuquerque FN, Onuma Y, Park SJ, Serruys PW. Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Bypass Surgery in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.06.024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27585503 (View on PubMed)

Puri R, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Auffret V. Routine Surveillance Coronary Angiography Post-PCI: Should We ReACT and Change Our Routine? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 23;10(2):118-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28040444 (View on PubMed)

Aurigemma C, Burzotta F, Porto I, Niccoli G, Leone AM, Crea F, Trani C. Clinical impact of routine angiographic follow-up after percutaneous coronary interventions on unprotected left main. Cardiol J. 2018;25(5):582-588. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0092. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30155864 (View on PubMed)

Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, Simonton CA, Genereux P, Puskas J, Kandzari DE, Morice MC, Lembo N, Brown WM 3rd, Taggart DP, Banning A, Merkely B, Horkay F, Boonstra PW, van Boven AJ, Ungi I, Bogats G, Mansour S, Noiseux N, Sabate M, Pomar J, Hickey M, Gershlick A, Buszman P, Bochenek A, Schampaert E, Page P, Dressler O, Kosmidou I, Mehran R, Pocock SJ, Kappetein AP; EXCEL Trial Investigators. Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2223-2235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27797291 (View on PubMed)

Makikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IB, Trovik T, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Kellerth T, Ravkilde J, Jensen LO, Kalinauskas G, Linder RB, Pentikainen M, Hervold A, Banning A, Zaman A, Cotton J, Eriksen E, Margus S, Sorensen HT, Nielsen PH, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Lassen JF, Maeng M, Oldroyd K, Berg G, Walsh SJ, Hanratty CG, Kumsars I, Stradins P, Steigen TK, Frobert O, Graham AN, Endresen PC, Corbascio M, Kajander O, Trivedi U, Hartikainen J, Anttila V, Hildick-Smith D, Thuesen L, Christiansen EH; NOBLE study investigators. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016 Dec 3;388(10061):2743-2752. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32052-9. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27810312 (View on PubMed)

Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, Pocock SJ, Morice MC, Puskas J, Kandzari DE, Karmpaliotis D, Brown WM 3rd, Lembo NJ, Banning A, Merkely B, Horkay F, Boonstra PW, van Boven AJ, Ungi I, Bogats G, Mansour S, Noiseux N, Sabate M, Pomar J, Hickey M, Gershlick A, Buszman PE, Bochenek A, Schampaert E, Page P, Modolo R, Gregson J, Simonton CA, Mehran R, Kosmidou I, Genereux P, Crowley A, Dressler O, Serruys PW; EXCEL Trial Investigators. Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1820-1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. Epub 2019 Sep 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31562798 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EPIC23-ANGELINE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Shockwave IVL + DCB
NCT05625997 RECRUITING