Patient Satisfaction for Digital Versus Conventional Maxillary Obturator

NCT ID: NCT05920811

Last Updated: 2023-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evidence regarding the performance of digital obturators totally fabricated using 3D printing is insufficient. This prospective randomized crossover study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with conventional maxillary obturator and totally full digitally fabricated obturator. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using two scales: The Obturator Functioning Scale" and "The Patient and operator-centered outcomes were assessed through two visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The use of digital technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses has been described. Additive manufacturing offers a more convenient and more efficient process with reduced material waste compared with traditional subtractive technique. Although Prosthetic rehabilitation with Conventional maxillary obturator prosthesis fabricated with a casted metal framework using, heat-cured acrylic resin can restore oral function and facial esthetics following maxillectomy. But it is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Multiple sources of errors can accumulate during the laboratory steps, resulting in a misfit of the framework. In this study All patients received a conventional obturator for 6 months, after a washout period of one week, they use the digital one. The Obturator Functioning Scale" and "The Patient and operator-centered outcomes were assessed through two visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaires.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Maxillofacial Prosthesis User

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

conventional obturator

maxillary obturator fabricated from cast metal framework, heat-cured acrylic resin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

conventional obturator

Intervention Type OTHER

restoration of midline maxillary defect with obturator made of cast metal , heat cure acrylic resin

3 d printed obturator

3d printed obturator with full digital workflow ( intraoral scanning, made of selective laser melting, 3d printed resin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3 d printed obturator

Intervention Type OTHER

restoration of midline maxillary defect with obturator made of SLM metal , 3 d printed resin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

conventional obturator

restoration of midline maxillary defect with obturator made of cast metal , heat cure acrylic resin

Intervention Type OTHER

3 d printed obturator

restoration of midline maxillary defect with obturator made of SLM metal , 3 d printed resin

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with hemimaxillectomy defect (Aramany class 1)
* almost edentulous mandible with healthy remaining teeth,
* mouth opening is not less than 25 mm, intact soft palate
* participants were not exposed to radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the previous year

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with physical or mental disorders.
* patients still receiving radio or chemotherapy
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marwa Mohammed Amer

lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

marwa M Amer

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tanta University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

marwa Mohammed Amer

Tanta, ElGharbia, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

prosth 6/23

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.